Rs4rs: Semantically Find Recent Publications from Top Recommendation System-Related Venues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05570v2
• Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:51:10 GMT
• Title: Rs4rs: Semantically Find Recent Publications from Top Recommendation System-Related Venues
• Authors: Tri Kurniawan Wijaya, Edoardo D'Amico, Gabor Fodor, Manuel V. Loureiro,
• Abstract summary: Rs4rs is a web application designed to perform semantic search on recent papers from top conferences and journals related to Recommender Systems. Rs4rs addresses these issues by providing a user-friendly platform where researchers can input their topic of interest and receive a list of recent, relevant papers from top Recommender Systems venues.
• Score: 0.2812395851874055
• License:
• Abstract: Rs4rs is a web application designed to perform semantic search on recent papers from top conferences and journals related to Recommender Systems. Current scholarly search engine tools like Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate often yield broad results that fail to target the most relevant high-quality publications. Moreover, manually visiting individual conference and journal websites is a time-consuming process that primarily supports only syntactic searches. Rs4rs addresses these issues by providing a user-friendly platform where researchers can input their topic of interest and receive a list of recent, relevant papers from top Recommender Systems venues. Utilizing semantic search techniques, Rs4rs ensures that the search results are not only precise and relevant but also comprehensive, capturing papers regardless of variations in wording. This tool significantly enhances research efficiency and accuracy, thereby benefitting the research community and public by facilitating access to high-quality, pertinent academic resources in the field of Recommender Systems. Rs4rs is available at https://rs4rs.com.

Related papers

• LitSearch: A Retrieval Benchmark for Scientific Literature Search [48.593157851171526]
  We introduce LitSearch, a retrieval benchmark comprising 597 realistic literature search queries about recent ML and NLP papers. All LitSearch questions were manually examined or edited by experts to ensure high quality. We find a significant performance gap between BM25 and state-of-the-art dense retrievers, with a 24.8% absolute difference in recall@5.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T18:00:03Z)
• SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey [50.04283471107001]
  This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers. SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level. Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T15:01:51Z)
• DiscoverPath: A Knowledge Refinement and Retrieval System for Interdisciplinarity on Biomedical Research [96.10765714077208]
  Traditional keyword-based search engines fall short in assisting users who may not be familiar with specific terminologies. We present a knowledge graph-based paper search engine for biomedical research to enhance the user experience. The system, dubbed DiscoverPath, employs Named Entity Recognition (NER) and part-of-speech (POS) tagging to extract terminologies and relationships from article abstracts to create a KG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T20:52:33Z)
• Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [57.38537491535016]
  Novel data sources bring new opportunities to improve the quality of recommender systems. Researchers may use impressions to refine user preferences and overcome the current limitations in recommender systems research. We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z)
• QuOTeS: Query-Oriented Technical Summarization [0.2936007114555107]
  We propose QuOTeS, an interactive system designed to retrieve sentences related to a summary of the research from a collection of potential references. QuOTeS integrates techniques from Query-Focused Extractive Summarization and High-Recall Information Retrieval to provide Interactive Query-Focused Summarization of scientific documents. The results show that QuOTeS provides a positive user experience and consistently provides query-focused summaries that are relevant, concise, and complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T18:43:24Z)
• Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines [70.59477647085387]
  Generative search engines directly generate responses to user queries, along with in-line citations. We conduct human evaluation to audit four popular generative search engines. We find that responses from existing generative search engines are fluent and appear informative, but frequently contain unsupported statements and inaccurate citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T17:56:12Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• Talk to Papers: Bringing Neural Question Answering to Academic Search [8.883733362171034]
  Talk to Papers exploits the recent open-domain question answering (QA) techniques to improve the current experience of academic search. It's designed to enable researchers to use natural language queries to find precise answers and extract insights from a massive amount of academic papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-04T19:19:55Z)
• A Correspondence Analysis Framework for Author-Conference Recommendations [2.1055643409860743]
  We use Correspondence Analysis (CA) to derive appropriate relationships between the entities in question, such as conferences and papers. Our models show promising results when compared with existing methods such as content-based filtering, collaborative filtering and hybrid filtering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T18:52:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.