Lost in Translation: Reimagining the Machine Learning Life Cycle in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03929v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:14:01 GMT
• Title: Lost in Translation: Reimagining the Machine Learning Life Cycle in Education
• Authors: Lydia T. Liu, Serena Wang, Tolani Britton, Rediet Abebe
• Abstract summary: Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly prevalent in education. There is a pressing need to investigate how ML techniques support long-standing education principles and goals. In this work, we shed light on this complex landscape drawing on qualitative insights from interviews with education experts.
• Score: 12.802237736747077
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly prevalent in education, from their use in predicting student dropout, to assisting in university admissions, and facilitating the rise of MOOCs. Given the rapid growth of these novel uses, there is a pressing need to investigate how ML techniques support long-standing education principles and goals. In this work, we shed light on this complex landscape drawing on qualitative insights from interviews with education experts. These interviews comprise in-depth evaluations of ML for education (ML4Ed) papers published in preeminent applied ML conferences over the past decade. Our central research goal is to critically examine how the stated or implied education and societal objectives of these papers are aligned with the ML problems they tackle. That is, to what extent does the technical problem formulation, objectives, approach, and interpretation of results align with the education problem at hand. We find that a cross-disciplinary gap exists and is particularly salient in two parts of the ML life cycle: the formulation of an ML problem from education goals and the translation of predictions to interventions. We use these insights to propose an extended ML life cycle, which may also apply to the use of ML in other domains. Our work joins a growing number of meta-analytical studies across education and ML research, as well as critical analyses of the societal impact of ML. Specifically, it fills a gap between the prevailing technical understanding of machine learning and the perspective of education researchers working with students and in policy.

Related papers

• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey [60.733557487886635]
  Tool learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for augmenting the capabilities of LLMs to tackle highly complex problems. Despite growing attention and rapid advancements in this field, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks systematic organization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T08:01:26Z)
• Investigating Youths' Everyday Understanding of Machine Learning Applications: a Knowledge-in-Pieces Perspective [0.0]
  Despite recent calls for including artificial intelligence in K-12 education, not enough attention has been paid to studying youths' everyday knowledge about machine learning (ML) We investigate teens' everyday understanding of ML through a knowledge-in-pieces perspective. Our analyses reveal that youths showed some understanding that ML applications learn from training data and that applications recognize patterns in input data and depending on these provide different outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T16:11:33Z)
• Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook [69.02214694865229]
  We systematically review the technological advancements in each perspective, organize related datasets and benchmarks, and identify the risks and challenges associated with deploying LLMs in education. Our survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological picture for educators, researchers, and policymakers to harness the power of LLMs to revolutionize educational practices and foster a more effective personalized learning environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T21:04:29Z)
• Adapting Large Language Models for Education: Foundational Capabilities, Potentials, and Challenges [60.62904929065257]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer possibility for resolving this issue by comprehending individual requests. This paper reviews the recently emerged LLM research related to educational capabilities, including mathematics, writing, programming, reasoning, and knowledge-based question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T14:37:32Z)
• Interpretability of Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Future Prospects [21.68362950922772]
  The proliferation of machine learning (ML) has drawn unprecedented interest in the study of various multimedia contents. The black-box nature of contemporary ML, especially in deep neural networks (DNNs), has posed a primary challenge for ML-based representation learning. This paper presents a survey on recent advances and future prospects on interpretability of ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T17:31:29Z)
• MLOps Spanning Whole Machine Learning Life Cycle: A Survey [4.910132890978536]
  Google AlphaGos win has significantly motivated and sped up machine learning (ML) research and development. This paper is aimed to present a clear picture of the state-of-the-art of the existing ML technologies with a comprehensive survey.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T04:12:38Z)
• Use and Misuse of Machine Learning in Anthropology [0.9786690381850356]
  We will focus on the field of paleoanthropology, which seeks to understand the evolution of the human species based on biological and cultural evidence. The aim of this paper is to provide a brief introduction to some of the ways in which ML has been applied within paleoanthropology. We discuss a series of missteps, errors, and violations of correct protocols of ML methods that appear disconcertingly often within the accumulating body of anthropological literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T20:32:24Z)
• Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture [0.0]
  The paradigm of Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) addresses this issue. MLOps is still a vague term and its consequences for researchers and professionals are ambiguous. We provide an aggregated overview of the necessary components, and roles, as well as the associated architecture and principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T19:38:48Z)
• Panoramic Learning with A Standardized Machine Learning Formalism [116.34627789412102]
  This paper presents a standardized equation of the learning objective, that offers a unifying understanding of diverse ML algorithms. It also provides guidance for mechanic design of new ML solutions, and serves as a promising vehicle towards panoramic learning with all experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-17T17:44:38Z)
• Understanding the Usability Challenges of Machine Learning In High-Stakes Decision Making [67.72855777115772]
  Machine learning (ML) is being applied to a diverse and ever-growing set of domains. In many cases, domain experts -- who often have no expertise in ML or data science -- are asked to use ML predictions to make high-stakes decisions. We investigate the ML usability challenges present in the domain of child welfare screening through a series of collaborations with child welfare screeners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T22:50:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.