Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03942v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:35:51 GMT
• Title: Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biases
• Authors: Rohan Taori and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto
• Abstract summary: We formalize a system where interactions with one model are recorded as history and scraped as training data in the future. We analyze its stability over time by tracking changes to a test-time bias statistic. We find that the degree of bias amplification is closely linked to whether the model's outputs behave like samples from the training distribution.
• Score: 9.773315369593876
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Datasets scraped from the internet have been critical to the successes of large-scale machine learning. Yet, this very success puts the utility of future internet-derived datasets at potential risk, as model outputs begin to replace human annotations as a source of supervision. In this work, we first formalize a system where interactions with one model are recorded as history and scraped as training data in the future. We then analyze its stability over time by tracking changes to a test-time bias statistic (e.g. gender bias of model predictions). We find that the degree of bias amplification is closely linked to whether the model's outputs behave like samples from the training distribution, a behavior which we characterize and define as consistent calibration. Experiments in three conditional prediction scenarios - image classification, visual role-labeling, and language generation - demonstrate that models that exhibit a sampling-like behavior are more calibrated and thus more stable. Based on this insight, we propose an intervention to help calibrate and stabilize unstable feedback systems. Code is available at https://github.com/rtaori/data_feedback.

Related papers

• Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation [19.625915578646758]
  This paper proposes a novel 2-stage learning pipeline featuring a data augmentation strategy able to regularize the training. Experiments on synthetic and realistic biased datasets show state-of-the-art classification accuracy, outperforming competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T09:19:59Z)
• Stubborn Lexical Bias in Data and Models [50.79738900885665]
  We use a new statistical method to examine whether spurious patterns in data appear in models trained on the data. We apply an optimization approach to *reweight* the training data, reducing thousands of spurious correlations. Surprisingly, though this method can successfully reduce lexical biases in the training data, we still find strong evidence of corresponding bias in the trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T20:12:27Z)
• Provable Robustness for Streaming Models with a Sliding Window [51.85182389861261]
  In deep learning applications such as online content recommendation and stock market analysis, models use historical data to make predictions. We derive robustness certificates for models that use a fixed-size sliding window over the input stream. Our guarantees hold for the average model performance across the entire stream and are independent of stream size, making them suitable for large data streams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T21:02:35Z)
• Variation of Gender Biases in Visual Recognition Models Before and After Finetuning [29.55318393877906]
  We introduce a framework to measure how biases change before and after fine-tuning a large scale visual recognition model for a downstream task. We find that supervised models trained on datasets such as ImageNet-21k are more likely to retain their pretraining biases. We also find that models finetuned on larger scale datasets are more likely to introduce new biased associations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T03:42:47Z)
• Time-Varying Propensity Score to Bridge the Gap between the Past and Present [104.46387765330142]
  We introduce a time-varying propensity score that can detect gradual shifts in the distribution of data. We demonstrate different ways of implementing it and evaluate it on a variety of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T07:21:49Z)
• Certifying Data-Bias Robustness in Linear Regression [12.00314910031517]
  We present a technique for certifying whether linear regression models are pointwise-robust to label bias in a training dataset. We show how to solve this problem exactly for individual test points, and provide an approximate but more scalable method. We also unearth gaps in bias-robustness, such as high levels of non-robustness for certain bias assumptions on some datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T20:47:07Z)
• Sampling Bias Correction for Supervised Machine Learning: A Bayesian Inference Approach with Practical Applications [0.0]
  We discuss a problem where a dataset might be subject to intentional sample bias such as label imbalance. We then apply this solution to binary logistic regression, and discuss scenarios where a dataset might be subject to intentional sample bias. This technique is widely applicable for statistical inference on big data, from the medical sciences to image recognition to marketing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-11T20:46:37Z)
• Conformal prediction for the design problem [72.14982816083297]
  In many real-world deployments of machine learning, we use a prediction algorithm to choose what data to test next. In such settings, there is a distinct type of distribution shift between the training and test data. We introduce a method to quantify predictive uncertainty in such settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T02:59:12Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Bayesian analysis of the prevalence bias: learning and predicting from imbalanced data [10.659348599372944]
  This paper lays the theoretical and computational framework for training models, and for prediction, in the presence of prevalence bias. It offers an alternative to principled training losses and complements test-time procedures based on selecting an operating point from summary curves. It integrates seamlessly in the current paradigm of (deep) learning using backpropagation and naturally with Bayesian models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-31T14:36:33Z)
• Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
  We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift. We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness. The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.