Sentiment is all you need to win US Presidential elections

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13487v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:06:53 GMT
• Title: Sentiment is all you need to win US Presidential elections
• Authors: Sovesh Mohapatra, Somesh Mohapatra
• Abstract summary: We study the speeches and sentiments of the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, and Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, fighting for the 2020 US Presidential election. Comparing the racial dichotomy of the United States, we analyze what led to the victory and defeat of the different candidates. We believe this work will inform the election campaigning strategy and provide a basis for communicating to diverse crowds.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Election speeches play an integral role in communicating the vision and mission of the candidates. From lofty promises to mud-slinging, the electoral candidate accounts for all. However, there remains an open question about what exactly wins over the voters. In this work, we used state-of-the-art natural language processing methods to study the speeches and sentiments of the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, and Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, fighting for the 2020 US Presidential election. Comparing the racial dichotomy of the United States, we analyze what led to the victory and defeat of the different candidates. We believe this work will inform the election campaigning strategy and provide a basis for communicating to diverse crowds.

Related papers

• Finding Hidden Swing Voters in the 2022 Italian Elections Twitter Discourse [1.3654846342364308]
  We examine the dynamics of political messaging and voter behavior on Twitter during the 2022 Italian general elections. Our analysis reveals that during election periods, the popularity of politicians increases, and there is a notable variation in the use of persuasive language techniques. Swing voters are more vulnerable to these propaganda techniques compared to non-swing voters, with differences in vulnerability patterns across various types of political shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T13:34:29Z)
• Quantifying the Uniqueness of Donald Trump in Presidential Discourse [51.76056700705539]
  This paper introduces a novel metric of uniqueness based on large language models. We find considerable evidence that Trump's speech patterns diverge from those of all major party nominees for the presidency in recent history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T19:00:17Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• The Chance of Winning Election Impacts on Social Media Strategy [7.528982057686348]
  We analyze candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. As their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T03:10:02Z)
• Novelty in news search: a longitudinal study of the 2020 US elections [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze novelty, a measurement of new items that emerge in the top news search results. We find more new items emerging for election related queries compared to topical or stable queries. We argue that such imbalances affect the visibility of political candidates in news searches during electoral periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T08:42:37Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)
• Hate Towards the Political Opponent: A Twitter Corpus Study of the 2020 US Elections on the Basis of Offensive Speech and Stance Detection [11.335643770130238]
  We investigate online communication of the supporters of the candidates Biden and Trump, by uttering hateful and offensive communication. We formulate an annotation task, in which we join the tasks of hateful/offensive speech detection and stance detection. We analyze if supporters of Joe Biden and the Democratic Party communicate differently than supporters of Donald Trump and the Republican Party.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T11:59:54Z)
• Towards Measuring Adversarial Twitter Interactions against Candidates in the US Midterm Elections [25.374045377135307]
  We measure the adversarial interactions against candidates for the US House of Representatives during the run-up to the 2018 US general election. We develop a new technique for detecting tweets with toxic content that are directed at any specific candidate. We use these techniques to outline the breadth of adversarial interactions seen in the election, including offensive name-calling, threats of violence, posting discrediting information, attacks on identity, and adversarial message repetition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T10:00:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.