Momentum Gradient Descent Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14086v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:30:38 GMT
• Title: Momentum Gradient Descent Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy
• Authors: Mengde Han, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou
• Abstract summary: In the big data era, the privacy of personal information has been more pronounced. In this article, we propose integrating federated learning and local differential privacy with momentum gradient descent to improve the performance of machine learning models.
• Score: 10.60240656423935
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Nowadays, the development of information technology is growing rapidly. In the big data era, the privacy of personal information has been more pronounced. The major challenge is to find a way to guarantee that sensitive personal information is not disclosed while data is published and analyzed. Centralized differential privacy is established on the assumption of a trusted third-party data curator. However, this assumption is not always true in reality. As a new privacy preservation model, local differential privacy has relatively strong privacy guarantees. Although federated learning has relatively been a privacy-preserving approach for distributed learning, it still introduces various privacy concerns. To avoid privacy threats and reduce communication costs, in this article, we propose integrating federated learning and local differential privacy with momentum gradient descent to improve the performance of machine learning models.

Related papers

• Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  We propose an effective approach called masked differential privacy (DP), which allows for controlling sensitive regions where differential privacy is applied. Our method operates selectively on data and allows for defining non-sensitive-temporal regions without DP application or combining differential privacy with other privacy techniques within data samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• Models Matter: Setting Accurate Privacy Expectations for Local and Central Differential Privacy [14.40391109414476]
  We design and evaluate new explanations of differential privacy for the local and central models. We find that consequences-focused explanations in the style of privacy nutrition labels are a promising approach for setting accurate privacy expectations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T01:21:57Z)
• Secure Aggregation is Not Private Against Membership Inference Attacks [66.59892736942953]
  We investigate the privacy implications of SecAgg in federated learning. We show that SecAgg offers weak privacy against membership inference attacks even in a single training round. Our findings underscore the imperative for additional privacy-enhancing mechanisms, such as noise injection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T15:07:58Z)
• Federated Transfer Learning with Differential Privacy [21.50525027559563]
  We formulate the notion of textitfederated differential privacy, which offers privacy guarantees for each data set without assuming a trusted central server. We show that federated differential privacy is an intermediate privacy model between the well-established local and central models of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T21:04:48Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining [75.25943383604266]
  We question whether the use of large Web-scraped datasets should be viewed as differential-privacy-preserving. We caution that publicizing these models pretrained on Web data as "private" could lead to harm and erode the public's trust in differential privacy as a meaningful definition of privacy. We conclude by discussing potential paths forward for the field of private learning, as public pretraining becomes more popular and powerful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T10:41:12Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• On Privacy and Confidentiality of Communications in Organizational Graphs [3.5270468102327004]
  This work shows how confidentiality is distinct from privacy in an enterprise context. It aims to formulate an approach to preserving confidentiality while leveraging principles from differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T19:45:56Z)
• Federated $f$-Differential Privacy [19.499120576896228]
  Federated learning (FL) is a training paradigm where the clients collaboratively learn models by repeatedly sharing information. We introduce federated $f$-differential privacy, a new notion specifically tailored to the federated setting. We then propose a generic private federated learning framework PriFedSync that accommodates a large family of state-of-the-art FL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T16:28:21Z)
• Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guarantees [69.4202374491817]
  We design privacy preserving exploration policies for episodic reinforcement learning (RL) We first provide a meaningful privacy formulation using the notion of joint differential privacy (JDP) We then develop a private optimism-based learning algorithm that simultaneously achieves strong PAC and regret bounds, and enjoys a JDP guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T20:18:35Z)
• LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy [20.95527613004989]
  Federated learning is a popular approach for privacy protection that collects the local gradient information instead of real data. Previous works do not give a practical solution due to three issues. Last, the privacy budget explodes due to the high dimensionality of weights in deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T01:08:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.