Causal Intervention-based Prompt Debiasing for Event Argument Extraction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01561v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:32:00 GMT
• Title: Causal Intervention-based Prompt Debiasing for Event Argument Extraction
• Authors: Jiaju Lin, Jie Zhou, Qin Chen
• Abstract summary: We compare two kinds of prompts, name-based prompt and ontology-base prompt, and reveal how ontology-base prompt methods exceed its counterpart in zero-shot event argument extraction (EAE) Experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate that modified by our debias method, the baseline model becomes both more effective and robust, with significant improvement in the resistance to adversarial attacks.
• Score: 19.057467535856485
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Prompt-based methods have become increasingly popular among information extraction tasks, especially in low-data scenarios. By formatting a finetune task into a pre-training objective, prompt-based methods resolve the data scarce problem effectively. However, seldom do previous research investigate the discrepancy among different prompt formulating strategies. In this work, we compare two kinds of prompts, name-based prompt and ontology-base prompt, and reveal how ontology-base prompt methods exceed its counterpart in zero-shot event argument extraction (EAE) . Furthermore, we analyse the potential risk in ontology-base prompts via a causal view and propose a debias method by causal intervention. Experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate that modified by our debias method, the baseline model becomes both more effective and robust, with significant improvement in the resistance to adversarial attacks.

Related papers

• Measuring the Reliability of Causal Probing Methods: Tradeoffs, Limitations, and the Plight of Nullifying Interventions [3.173096780177902]
  Causal probing is an approach to interpreting foundation models, such as large language models. We propose a general empirical analysis framework to evaluate the reliability of causal probing interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T03:45:49Z)
• READ: Improving Relation Extraction from an ADversarial Perspective [33.44949503459933]
  We propose an adversarial training method specifically designed for relation extraction (RE) Our approach introduces both sequence- and token-level perturbations to the sample and uses a separate perturbation vocabulary to improve the search for entity and context perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T16:42:44Z)
• Multi-modal Causal Structure Learning and Root Cause Analysis [67.67578590390907]
  We propose Mulan, a unified multi-modal causal structure learning method for root cause localization. We leverage a log-tailored language model to facilitate log representation learning, converting log sequences into time-series data. We also introduce a novel key performance indicator-aware attention mechanism for assessing modality reliability and co-learning a final causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T05:50:38Z)
• Few-Shot Anomaly Detection with Adversarial Loss for Robust Feature Representations [8.915958745269442]
  Anomaly detection is a critical and challenging task that aims to identify data points deviating from normal patterns and distributions within a dataset. Various methods have been proposed using a one-class-one-model approach, but these techniques often face practical problems such as memory inefficiency and the requirement of sufficient data for training. We propose a few-shot anomaly detection method that integrates adversarial training loss to obtain more robust and generalized feature representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T09:45:02Z)
• Token-Level Adversarial Prompt Detection Based on Perplexity Measures and Contextual Information [67.78183175605761]
  Large Language Models are susceptible to adversarial prompt attacks. This vulnerability underscores a significant concern regarding the robustness and reliability of LLMs. We introduce a novel approach to detecting adversarial prompts at a token level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T03:17:21Z)
• Progressive Evidence Refinement for Open-domain Multimodal Retrieval Question Answering [20.59485758381809]
  Current multimodal retrieval question-answering models face two main challenges. utilizing compressed evidence features as input to the model results in the loss of fine-grained information within the evidence. We propose a two-stage framework for evidence retrieval and question-answering to alleviate these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T01:18:39Z)
• Black-box Adversarial Attacks against Dense Retrieval Models: A Multi-view Contrastive Learning Method [115.29382166356478]
  We introduce the adversarial retrieval attack (AREA) task. It is meant to trick DR models into retrieving a target document that is outside the initial set of candidate documents retrieved by the DR model. We find that the promising results that have previously been reported on attacking NRMs, do not generalize to DR models. We propose to formalize attacks on DR models as a contrastive learning problem in a multi-view representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T00:24:59Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• ADDMU: Detection of Far-Boundary Adversarial Examples with Data and Model Uncertainty Estimation [125.52743832477404]
  Adversarial Examples Detection (AED) is a crucial defense technique against adversarial attacks. We propose a new technique, textbfADDMU, which combines two types of uncertainty estimation for both regular and FB adversarial example detection. Our new method outperforms previous methods by 3.6 and 6.0 emphAUC points under each scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T09:11:12Z)
• Deterministic and Discriminative Imitation (D2-Imitation): Revisiting Adversarial Imitation for Sample Efficiency [61.03922379081648]
  We propose an off-policy sample efficient approach that requires no adversarial training or min-max optimization. Our empirical results show that D2-Imitation is effective in achieving good sample efficiency, outperforming several off-policy extension approaches of adversarial imitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-11T19:36:19Z)
• TREATED:Towards Universal Defense against Textual Adversarial Attacks [28.454310179377302]
  We propose TREATED, a universal adversarial detection method that can defend against attacks of various perturbation levels without making any assumptions. Extensive experiments on three competitive neural networks and two widely used datasets show that our method achieves better detection performance than baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T03:31:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.