Few-Shot Calibration of Set Predictors via Meta-Learned Cross-Validation-Based Conformal Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03067v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:21:03 GMT
• Title: Few-Shot Calibration of Set Predictors via Meta-Learned Cross-Validation-Based Conformal Prediction
• Authors: Sangwoo Park, Kfir M. Cohen, Osvaldo Simeone
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel meta-learning solution that aims at reducing the set prediction size. It builds on cross-validation-based CP, rather than the less efficient validation-based CP. It preserves formal per-task calibration guarantees, rather than less stringent task-marginal guarantees.
• Score: 33.33774397643919
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conventional frequentist learning is known to yield poorly calibrated models that fail to reliably quantify the uncertainty of their decisions. Bayesian learning can improve calibration, but formal guarantees apply only under restrictive assumptions about correct model specification. Conformal prediction (CP) offers a general framework for the design of set predictors with calibration guarantees that hold regardless of the underlying data generation mechanism. However, when training data are limited, CP tends to produce large, and hence uninformative, predicted sets. This paper introduces a novel meta-learning solution that aims at reducing the set prediction size. Unlike prior work, the proposed meta-learning scheme, referred to as meta-XB, (i) builds on cross-validation-based CP, rather than the less efficient validation-based CP; and (ii) preserves formal per-task calibration guarantees, rather than less stringent task-marginal guarantees. Finally, meta-XB is extended to adaptive non-conformal scores, which are shown empirically to further enhance marginal per-input calibration.

Related papers

• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data. We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Online scalable Gaussian processes with conformal prediction for guaranteed coverage [32.21093722162573]
  The consistency of the resulting uncertainty values hinges on the premise that the learning function conforms to the properties specified by the GP model. We propose to wed the GP with the prevailing conformal prediction (CP), a distribution-free post-processing framework that produces it prediction sets with a provably valid coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:22:15Z)
• Normalizing Flows for Conformal Regression [0.0]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) algorithms estimate the uncertainty of a prediction model by calibrating its outputs on labeled data. We present a general scheme to localize the intervals by training the calibration process. Unlike the Error Reweighting CP algorithm of Papadopoulos et al. (2008), the framework allows estimating the gap between nominal and empirical conditional validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T15:04:28Z)
• Adapting Conformal Prediction to Distribution Shifts Without Labels [16.478151550456804]
  Conformal prediction (CP) enables machine learning models to output prediction sets with guaranteed coverage rate. Our goal is to improve the quality of CP-generated prediction sets using only unlabeled data from the test domain. This is achieved by two new methods called ECP and EACP, that adjust the score function in CP according to the base model's uncertainty on the unlabeled test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T15:16:02Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning [37.82259435084825]
  This paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs) It applies both data-dependent or data-independent regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T14:19:15Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Modular Conformal Calibration [80.33410096908872]
  We introduce a versatile class of algorithms for recalibration in regression. This framework allows one to transform any regression model into a calibrated probabilistic model. We conduct an empirical study of MCC on 17 regression datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T03:25:23Z)
• T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
  We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem. detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions. We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z)
• Learning Optimal Conformal Classifiers [32.68483191509137]
  Conformal prediction (CP) is used to predict confidence sets containing the true class with a user-specified probability. This paper explores strategies to differentiate through CP during training with the goal of training model with the conformal wrapper end-to-end. We show that conformal training (ConfTr) outperforms state-of-the-art CP methods for classification by reducing the average confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T11:25:33Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.