On double-descent in uncertainty quantification in overparametrized models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12760v4
• Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 09:16:13 GMT
• Title: On double-descent in uncertainty quantification in overparametrized models
• Authors: Lucas Clart\'e, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborov\'a
• Abstract summary: Uncertainty quantification is a central challenge in reliable and trustworthy machine learning. We show a trade-off between classification accuracy and calibration, unveiling a double descent like behavior in the calibration curve of optimally regularized estimators. This is in contrast with the empirical Bayes method, which we show to be well calibrated in our setting despite the higher generalization error and overparametrization.
• Score: 24.073221004661427
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty quantification is a central challenge in reliable and trustworthy machine learning. Naive measures such as last-layer scores are well-known to yield overconfident estimates in the context of overparametrized neural networks. Several methods, ranging from temperature scaling to different Bayesian treatments of neural networks, have been proposed to mitigate overconfidence, most often supported by the numerical observation that they yield better calibrated uncertainty measures. In this work, we provide a sharp comparison between popular uncertainty measures for binary classification in a mathematically tractable model for overparametrized neural networks: the random features model. We discuss a trade-off between classification accuracy and calibration, unveiling a double descent like behavior in the calibration curve of optimally regularized estimators as a function of overparametrization. This is in contrast with the empirical Bayes method, which we show to be well calibrated in our setting despite the higher generalization error and overparametrization.

Related papers

• Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models [4.619907534483781]
  computational models that predict drug-target interactions are valuable tools to accelerate the development of new therapeutic agents. However, such models can be poorly calibrated, which results in unreliable uncertainty estimates. We show that combining post hoc calibration method with well-performing uncertainty quantification approaches can boost model accuracy and calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T10:29:00Z)
• Domain-adaptive and Subgroup-specific Cascaded Temperature Regression for Out-of-distribution Calibration [16.930766717110053]
  We propose a novel meta-set-based cascaded temperature regression method for post-hoc calibration. We partition each meta-set into subgroups based on predicted category and confidence level, capturing diverse uncertainties. A regression network is then trained to derive category-specific and confidence-level-specific scaling, achieving calibration across meta-sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:35:57Z)
• Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning [37.82259435084825]
  This paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs) It applies both data-dependent or data-independent regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T14:19:15Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks [77.34726150561087]
  This paper presents a survey of confidence calibration problems in the context of neural networks. We analyze problem statement, calibration definitions, and different approaches to evaluation. Empirical experiments cover various datasets and models, comparing calibration methods according to different criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T20:27:51Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Confidence estimation of classification based on the distribution of the neural network output layer [4.529188601556233]
  One of the most common problems preventing the application of prediction models in the real world is lack of generalization. We propose novel methods that estimate uncertainty of particular predictions generated by a neural network classification model. The proposed methods infer the confidence of a particular prediction based on the distribution of the logit values corresponding to this prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T12:32:50Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Revisiting One-vs-All Classifiers for Predictive Uncertainty and Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networks [22.34227625637843]
  We investigate how the parametrization of the probabilities in discriminative classifiers affects the uncertainty estimates. We show that one-vs-all formulations can improve calibration on image classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-10T01:55:02Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks using Splines [51.42640515410253]
  Measuring calibration error amounts to comparing two empirical distributions. We introduce a binning-free calibration measure inspired by the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistical test. Our method consistently outperforms existing methods on KS error as well as other commonly used calibration measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T07:18:05Z)
• Regularizing Class-wise Predictions via Self-knowledge Distillation [80.76254453115766]
  We propose a new regularization method that penalizes the predictive distribution between similar samples. This results in regularizing the dark knowledge (i.e., the knowledge on wrong predictions) of a single network. Our experimental results on various image classification tasks demonstrate that the simple yet powerful method can significantly improve the generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-31T06:03:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.