Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14185v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 10:29:00 GMT
• Title: Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models
• Authors: Hannah Rosa Friesacher, Ola Engkvist, Lewis Mervin, Yves Moreau, Adam Arany,
• Abstract summary: computational models that predict drug-target interactions are valuable tools to accelerate the development of new therapeutic agents. However, such models can be poorly calibrated, which results in unreliable uncertainty estimates. We show that combining post hoc calibration method with well-performing uncertainty quantification approaches can boost model accuracy and calibration.
• Score: 4.619907534483781
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the drug discovery process, where experiments can be costly and time-consuming, computational models that predict drug-target interactions are valuable tools to accelerate the development of new therapeutic agents. Estimating the uncertainty inherent in these neural network predictions provides valuable information that facilitates optimal decision-making when risk assessment is crucial. However, such models can be poorly calibrated, which results in unreliable uncertainty estimates that do not reflect the true predictive uncertainty. In this study, we compare different metrics, including accuracy and calibration scores, used for model hyperparameter tuning to investigate which model selection strategy achieves well-calibrated models. Furthermore, we propose to use a computationally efficient Bayesian uncertainty estimation method named Bayesian Linear Probing (BLP), which generates Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) trajectories to obtain samples for the parameters of a Bayesian Logistic Regression fitted to the hidden layer of the baseline neural network. We report that BLP improves model calibration and achieves the performance of common uncertainty quantification methods by combining the benefits of uncertainty estimation and probability calibration methods. Finally, we show that combining post hoc calibration method with well-performing uncertainty quantification approaches can boost model accuracy and calibration.

Related papers

• Neural parameter calibration and uncertainty quantification for epidemic forecasting [0.0]
  We apply a novel and powerful computational method to the problem of learning probability densities on contagion parameters. Using a neural network, we calibrate an ODE model to data of the spread of COVID-19 in Berlin in 2020. We show convergence of our method to the true posterior on a simplified SIR model of epidemics, and also demonstrate our method's learning capabilities on a reduced dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T21:34:59Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• On double-descent in uncertainty quantification in overparametrized models [24.073221004661427]
  Uncertainty quantification is a central challenge in reliable and trustworthy machine learning. We show a trade-off between classification accuracy and calibration, unveiling a double descent like behavior in the calibration curve of optimally regularized estimators. This is in contrast with the empirical Bayes method, which we show to be well calibrated in our setting despite the higher generalization error and overparametrization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T16:01:08Z)
• On Calibrated Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning [0.0]
  We extend the approximate inference for the loss-calibrated Bayesian framework to dropweights based Bayesian neural networks. We show that decisions informed by loss-calibrated uncertainty can improve diagnostic performance to a greater extent than straightforward alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T20:16:32Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Improving Deterministic Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning for Classification and Regression [30.112634874443494]
  We propose a new model that estimates uncertainty in a single forward pass. Our approach combines a bi-Lipschitz feature extractor with an inducing point approximate Gaussian process, offering robust and principled uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T23:29:12Z)
• Variance based sensitivity analysis for Monte Carlo and importance sampling reliability assessment with Gaussian processes [0.0]
  We propose a methodology to quantify the sensitivity of the probability of failure estimator to two uncertainty sources. This analysis also enables to control the whole error associated to the failure probability estimate and thus provides an accuracy criterion on the estimation. The approach is proposed for both a Monte Carlo based method as well as an importance sampling based method, seeking to improve the estimation of rare event probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T17:06:28Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
  We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models. In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method. We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.