Strong entanglement criteria for mixed states, based on uncertainty
relations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16551v1
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:00:41 GMT
- Title: Strong entanglement criteria for mixed states, based on uncertainty
relations
- Authors: Manju Maan, Asoka Biswas, and Shubhrangshu Dasgupta
- Abstract summary: We show that any mixed entangled state can be characterized by our criterion.
The proposed criterion reduces to the Schrodinger-Robertson inequality for pure states.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We propose an entanglement criterion, specially designed for mixed states,
based on uncertainty relation and the Wigner-Yanase skew information. The
variances in this uncertainty relation does not involve any classical mixing
uncertainty, and thus turns out to be purely of quantum mechanical nature. We
show that any mixed entangled state can be characterized by our criterion. We
demonstrate its utility for several generalized mixed entangled state including
Werner states and it turns out to be stronger than any other known criterion in
identifying the correct domain of relevant parameters for entanglement. The
proposed criterion reduces to the Schrodinger-Robertson inequality for pure
states.
Related papers
- State-dependent and state-independent uncertainty relations for skew information and standard deviation [0.0]
We derive uncertainty equality based on standard deviation for incompatible operators with mixed states.
We show that for pure states, the Wigner-Yanase skew information based state-independent uncertainty relations become standard deviation based state-independent uncertainty relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T16:28:29Z) - Unified Uncertainty Calibration [43.733911707842005]
We introduce emphunified uncertainty calibration (U2C), a holistic framework to combine aleatoric and uncertainty uncertainties.
U2C enables a clean learning-theoretical analysis of uncertainty estimation, and outperforms reject-or-classify across a variety of ImageNet benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T13:42:36Z) - Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements.
This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance.
However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z) - Rosenthal-type inequalities for linear statistics of Markov chains [20.606986885851573]
We establish novel deviation bounds for additive functionals of geometrically ergodic Markov chains.
We pay special attention to the dependence of our bounds on the mixing time of the corresponding chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-10T10:24:46Z) - Simulating Entanglement beyond Quantum Steering [15.808504285017948]
We quantify the resource content of such states in terms of how much shared randomness is needed to simulate their behavior.
We rigorously show that the shared randomness cost is unbounded even for some two-qubit unsteerable states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T18:52:33Z) - Uncertainty relations with the variance and the quantum Fisher
information based on convex decompositions of density matrices [0.0]
We present several inequalities related to the Robertson-Schr"odinger uncertainty relation.
By considering a concave roof of the bound, we obtain an improvement of the Robertson-Schr"odinger uncertainty relation.
We present further uncertainty relations that provide lower bounds on the metrological usefulness of bipartite quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-14T18:00:07Z) - Experimental test of the majorization uncertainty relation with mixed
states [6.613272059966484]
The uncertainty relation lies at the heart of quantum theory and behaves as a non-classical constraint on the indeterminacies of incompatible observables in a system.
In this work we test the novel majorization uncertainty relations of three incompatible observables using a series of mixed states with adjustable mixing degrees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T01:18:32Z) - Non-equilibrium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice
models [68.8204255655161]
We show how generic non-Hermitian tight-binding lattice models can be realized in an unconditional, quantum-mechanically consistent manner.
We focus on the quantum steady states of such models for both fermionic and bosonic systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T18:56:44Z) - Estimating means of bounded random variables by betting [39.98103047898974]
This paper derives confidence intervals (CI) and time-uniform confidence sequences (CS) for the classical problem of estimating an unknown mean from bounded observations.
We present a general approach for deriving concentration bounds, that can be seen as a generalization and improvement of the celebrated Chernoff method.
We show how to extend these ideas to sampling without replacement, another heavily studied problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T17:22:03Z) - A Universal Formulation of Uncertainty Relation for Error and
Disturbance [0.9479435599284545]
We present a universal formulation of uncertainty relation valid for any conceivable quantum measurement.
Owing to its simplicity and operational tangibility, our general relation is also experimentally verifiable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-13T17:57:41Z) - Mean Value of the Quantum Potential and Uncertainty Relations [0.0]
In this work we determine a lower bound to the mean value of the quantum potential for an arbitrary state.
We derive a generalized uncertainty relation that is stronger than the Robertson-Schr"odinger inequality and hence also stronger than the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-04T19:25:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.