Bayesian Model Selection of Lithium-Ion Battery Models via Bayesian Quadrature

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17299v4
• Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 06:22:35 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Model Selection of Lithium-Ion Battery Models via Bayesian Quadrature
• Authors: Masaki Adachi, Yannick Kuhn, Birger Horstmann, Arnulf Latz, Michael A. Osborne, David A. Howey
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach using Bayesian quadrature. The model evidence is adopted as the selection metric, choosing the simplest model that describes the data, in the spirit of Occam's razor. We show that popular model selection criteria, such as root-mean-square error and Bayesian information criterion, can fail to select a parsimonious model in the case of a multimodal posterior.
• Score: 15.427086271923445
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: A wide variety of battery models are available, and it is not always obvious which model `best' describes a dataset. This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach using Bayesian quadrature. The model evidence is adopted as the selection metric, choosing the simplest model that describes the data, in the spirit of Occam's razor. However, estimating this requires integral computations over parameter space, which is usually prohibitively expensive. Bayesian quadrature offers sample-efficient integration via model-based inference that minimises the number of battery model evaluations. The posterior distribution of model parameters can also be inferred as a byproduct without further computation. Here, the simplest lithium-ion battery models, equivalent circuit models, were used to analyse the sensitivity of the selection criterion to given different datasets and model configurations. We show that popular model selection criteria, such as root-mean-square error and Bayesian information criterion, can fail to select a parsimonious model in the case of a multimodal posterior. The model evidence can spot the optimal model in such cases, simultaneously providing the variance of the evidence inference itself as an indication of confidence. We also show that Bayesian quadrature can compute the evidence faster than popular Monte Carlo based solvers.

Related papers

• Stabilizing black-box model selection with the inflated argmax [8.52745154080651]
  This paper presents a new approach to stabilizing model selection that leverages a combination of bagging and an "inflated" argmax operation. Our method selects a small collection of models that all fit the data, and it is stable in that, with high probability, the removal of any training point will result in a collection of selected models that overlaps with the original collection. In both settings, the proposed method yields stable and compact collections of selected models, outperforming a variety of benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T20:39:07Z)
• Fusion of Gaussian Processes Predictions with Monte Carlo Sampling [61.31380086717422]
  In science and engineering, we often work with models designed for accurate prediction of variables of interest. Recognizing that these models are approximations of reality, it becomes desirable to apply multiple models to the same data and integrate their outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T04:21:21Z)
• The Interpolating Information Criterion for Overparameterized Models [49.283527214211446]
  We show that the Interpolating Information Criterion is a measure of model quality that naturally incorporates the choice of prior into the model selection. Our new information criterion accounts for prior misspecification, geometric and spectral properties of the model, and is numerically consistent with known empirical and theoretical behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T12:09:54Z)
• Investigating Ensemble Methods for Model Robustness Improvement of Text Classifiers [66.36045164286854]
  We analyze a set of existing bias features and demonstrate there is no single model that works best for all the cases. By choosing an appropriate bias model, we can obtain a better robustness result than baselines with a more sophisticated model design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T17:52:10Z)
• Model Comparison in Approximate Bayesian Computation [0.456877715768796]
  A common problem in natural sciences is the comparison of competing models in the light of observed data. This framework relies on the calculation of likelihood functions which are intractable for most models used in practice. I propose a new efficient method to perform Bayesian model comparison in ABC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T10:24:16Z)
• Bayesian Regression Approach for Building and Stacking Predictive Models in Time Series Analytics [0.0]
  The paper describes the use of Bayesian regression for building time series models and stacking different predictive models for time series. It makes it possible to estimate an uncertainty of time series prediction and calculate value at risk characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T12:58:23Z)
• Sampling from Arbitrary Functions via PSD Models [55.41644538483948]
  We take a two-step approach by first modeling the probability distribution and then sampling from that model. We show that these models can approximate a large class of densities concisely using few evaluations, and present a simple algorithm to effectively sample from these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T12:25:22Z)
• Design of Dynamic Experiments for Black-Box Model Discrimination [72.2414939419588]
  Consider a dynamic model discrimination setting where we wish to chose: (i) what is the best mechanistic, time-varying model and (ii) what are the best model parameter estimates. For rival mechanistic models where we have access to gradient information, we extend existing methods to incorporate a wider range of problem uncertainty. We replace these black-box models with Gaussian process surrogate models and thereby extend the model discrimination setting to additionally incorporate rival black-box model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-07T11:34:39Z)
• On Statistical Efficiency in Learning [37.08000833961712]
  We address the challenge of model selection to strike a balance between model fitting and model complexity. We propose an online algorithm that sequentially expands the model complexity to enhance selection stability and reduce cost. Experimental studies show that the proposed method has desirable predictive power and significantly less computational cost than some popular methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T16:08:29Z)
• Amortized Bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learning [0.12314765641075436]
  We propose a novel method for performing Bayesian model comparison using specialized deep learning architectures. Our method is purely simulation-based and circumvents the step of explicitly fitting all alternative models under consideration to each observed dataset. We show that our method achieves excellent results in terms of accuracy, calibration, and efficiency across the examples considered in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T15:15:46Z)
• Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes [71.44735417472043]
  We show that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions. Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model. In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T19:23:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.