Global and Local Analysis of Interestingness for Competency-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06376v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 17:48:42 GMT
• Title: Global and Local Analysis of Interestingness for Competency-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Pedro Sequeira, Jesse Hostetler, Melinda Gervasio
• Abstract summary: We extend a recently-proposed framework for explainable reinforcement learning (RL) based on analyses of "interestingness" Our tools provide insights about RL agent competence, both their capabilities and limitations, enabling users to make more informed decisions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, advances in deep learning have resulted in a plethora of successes in the use of reinforcement learning (RL) to solve complex sequential decision tasks with high-dimensional inputs. However, existing systems lack the necessary mechanisms to provide humans with a holistic view of their competence, presenting an impediment to their adoption, particularly in critical applications where the decisions an agent makes can have significant consequences. Yet, existing RL-based systems are essentially competency-unaware in that they lack the necessary interpretation mechanisms to allow human operators to have an insightful, holistic view of their competency. In this paper, we extend a recently-proposed framework for explainable RL that is based on analyses of "interestingness." Our new framework provides various measures of RL agent competence stemming from interestingness analysis and is applicable to a wide range of RL algorithms. We also propose novel mechanisms for assessing RL agents' competencies that: 1) identify agent behavior patterns and competency-controlling conditions by clustering agent behavior traces solely using interestingness data; and 2) identify the task elements mostly responsible for an agent's behavior, as measured through interestingness, by performing global and local analyses using SHAP values. Overall, our tools provide insights about RL agent competence, both their capabilities and limitations, enabling users to make more informed decisions about interventions, additional training, and other interactions in collaborative human-machine settings.

Related papers

• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents [76.95062553043607]
  evaluating large language models (LLMs) is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. We introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T01:51:00Z)
• Visibility into AI Agents [9.067567737098594]
  Increased delegation of commercial, scientific, governmental, and personal activities to AI agents may exacerbate existing societal risks. We assess three categories of measures to increase visibility into AI agents: agent identifiers, real-time monitoring, and activity logging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T23:18:33Z)
• Advantage Actor-Critic with Reasoner: Explaining the Agent's Behavior from an Exploratory Perspective [19.744322603358402]
  We propose a novel Advantage Actor-Critic with Reasoner (A2CR) A2CR automatically generates a more comprehensive and interpretable paradigm for understanding the agent's decision-making process. It offers a range of functionalities such as purpose-based saliency, early failure detection, and model supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T07:19:20Z)
• ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners [60.54312035818746]
  We introduce the Experiential Learning (ExpeL) agent to allow learning from agent experiences without requiring parametric updates. Our agent autonomously gathers experiences and extracts knowledge using natural language from a collection of training tasks. At inference, the agent recalls its extracted insights and past experiences to make informed decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T03:03:34Z)
• IxDRL: A Novel Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning Toolkit based on Analyses of Interestingness [0.0]
  We propose a new framework based on analyses of interestingness. Our tool provides various measures of RL agent competence stemming from interestingness analysis. We show that our framework can provide agent designers with insights about RL agent competence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T02:43:19Z)
• An Interactive Explanatory AI System for Industrial Quality Control [0.8889304968879161]
  We aim to extend the defect detection task towards an interactive human-in-the-loop approach. We propose an approach for an interactive support system for classifications in an industrial quality control setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T09:04:46Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Broad-XAI: A Conceptual Framework and Survey [0.7366405857677226]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods provide a potential backbone for the cognitive model required for the development of Broad-XAI. RL represents a suite of approaches that have had increasing success in solving a range of sequential decision-making problems. This paper aims to introduce a conceptual framework, called the Causal XRL Framework (CXF), that unifies the current XRL research and uses RL as a backbone to the development of Broad-XAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T05:18:50Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)
• Dynamics Generalization via Information Bottleneck in Deep Reinforcement Learning [90.93035276307239]
  We propose an information theoretic regularization objective and an annealing-based optimization method to achieve better generalization ability in RL agents. We demonstrate the extreme generalization benefits of our approach in different domains ranging from maze navigation to robotic tasks. This work provides a principled way to improve generalization in RL by gradually removing information that is redundant for task-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-03T02:24:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.