Bayesian Network Models of Causal Interventions in Healthcare Decision Making: Literature Review and Software Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15258v1
• Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:22:07 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Network Models of Causal Interventions in Healthcare Decision Making: Literature Review and Software Evaluation
• Authors: Artem Velikzhanin, Benjie Wang and Marta Kwiatkowska
• Abstract summary: This report summarises the outcomes of a systematic literature search to identify Bayesian network models used to support decision making in healthcare. The selected research papers are briefly reviewed, with the view to identify publicly available models and datasets that are well suited to analysis using the causal interventional analysis software tool developed in Wang B, Lyle C, Kwiatkowska M.
• Score: 16.997060715857987
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This report summarises the outcomes of a systematic literature search to identify Bayesian network models used to support decision making in healthcare. After describing the search methodology, the selected research papers are briefly reviewed, with the view to identify publicly available models and datasets that are well suited to analysis using the causal interventional analysis software tool developed in Wang B, Lyle C, Kwiatkowska M (2021). Finally, an experimental evaluation of applying the software on a selection of models is carried out and preliminary results are reported.

Related papers

• Lessons Learned on Information Retrieval in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison of Embedding Models and Pooling Strategies [8.822087602255504]
  Applying large language models to the clinical domain is challenging due to the context-heavy nature of processing medical records. This paper explores how different embedding models and pooling methods affect information retrieval for the clinical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T16:16:08Z)
• Selecting Interpretability Techniques for Healthcare Machine Learning models [69.65384453064829]
  In healthcare there is a pursuit for employing interpretable algorithms to assist healthcare professionals in several decision scenarios. We overview a selection of eight algorithms, both post-hoc and model-based, that can be used for such purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:49:04Z)
• Out-of-distribution Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A survey [12.778646136644399]
  Computer-aided diagnostics has benefited from the development of deep learning-based computer vision techniques. Traditional supervised deep learning methods assume that the test sample is drawn from the identical distribution as the training data. It is possible to encounter out-of-distribution samples in real-world clinical scenarios, which may cause silent failure in deep learning-based medical image analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T18:51:32Z)
• Zero-shot Generative Large Language Models for Systematic Review Screening Automation [55.403958106416574]
  This study investigates the effectiveness of using zero-shot large language models for automatic screening. We evaluate the effectiveness of eight different LLMs and investigate a calibration technique that uses a predefined recall threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T01:54:08Z)
• Automated Test Production -- Systematic Literature Review [0.0]
  This review aims to identify the main contributions related to the Automated Test Production of Computer Programs. The results will enable a comprehensive analysis and insight to evaluate their applicability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T02:21:18Z)
• Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models [59.89454513692417]
  Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:12:28Z)
• Development and validation of a natural language processing algorithm to pseudonymize documents in the context of a clinical data warehouse [53.797797404164946]
  The study highlights the difficulties faced in sharing tools and resources in this domain. We annotated a corpus of clinical documents according to 12 types of identifying entities. We build a hybrid system, merging the results of a deep learning model as well as manual rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T17:17:46Z)
• This Patient Looks Like That Patient: Prototypical Networks for Interpretable Diagnosis Prediction from Clinical Text [56.32427751440426]
  In clinical practice such models must not only be accurate, but provide doctors with interpretable and helpful results. We introduce ProtoPatient, a novel method based on prototypical networks and label-wise attention. We evaluate the model on two publicly available clinical datasets and show that it outperforms existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T10:12:07Z)
• Interpretability-Driven Sample Selection Using Self Supervised Learning For Disease Classification And Segmentation [4.898744396854313]
  We propose a novel sample selection methodology based on deep features leveraging information contained in interpretability saliency maps. We show our proposed self supervised approach outperforms other approaches in selecting informative samples leading to state of the art performance with fewer samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-13T10:46:33Z)
• Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
  We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation. adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation. Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z)
• A Visual Analytics System for Multi-model Comparison on Clinical Data Predictions [21.86694022749115]
  We develop a visual analytics system that compares multiple models' prediction criteria and evaluates their consistency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system to assist clinicians and researchers in comparing and quantitatively evaluating different machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T20:33:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.