Automated Test Production -- Systematic Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02033v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:21:18 GMT
• Title: Automated Test Production -- Systematic Literature Review
• Authors: Jos\'e Marcos Gomes and Luis Alberto Vieira Dias
• Abstract summary: This review aims to identify the main contributions related to the Automated Test Production of Computer Programs. The results will enable a comprehensive analysis and insight to evaluate their applicability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Identifying the main contributions related to the Automated Test Production (ATP) of Computer Programs and providing an overview about models, methodologies and tools used for this purpose is the aim of this Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The results will enable a comprehensive analysis and insight to evaluate their applicability. A previously produced Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) contributed to the formulation of the ``Research Questions'' and parameters for the definition of the qualitative analysis protocol of this review.

Related papers

• Machine Learning Innovations in CPR: A Comprehensive Survey on Enhanced Resuscitation Techniques [52.71395121577439]
  This survey paper explores the transformative role of Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) It highlights the impact of predictive modeling, AI-enhanced devices, and real-time data analysis in improving resuscitation outcomes. The paper provides a comprehensive overview, classification, and critical analysis of current applications, challenges, and future directions in this emerging field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T18:01:50Z)
• Analysis of Socially Unacceptable Discourse with Zero-shot Learning [2.3999111269325266]
  Socially Unacceptable Discourse (SUD) analysis is crucial for maintaining online positive environments. We investigate the effectiveness of Entailment-based zero-shot text classification (unsupervised method) for SUD detection and characterization by leveraging pre-trained transformer models and prompting techniques. The results demonstrate good generalization capabilities of these models to unseen data and highlight the promising nature of this approach for generating labeled datasets for the analysis and characterization of extremist narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T07:32:00Z)
• Novel Topological Machine Learning Methodology for Stream-of-Quality Modeling in Smart Manufacturing [0.5852077003870417]
  This paper presents a topological analytics approach within the 5-level Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) architecture for the Stream-of-Quality assessment in smart manufacturing. The proposed methodology not only enables real-time quality monitoring and predictive analytics but also discovers the hidden relationships between quality features and process parameters across different manufacturing processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T04:06:08Z)
• System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation [5.194208843843004]
  We introduce a novel multi-AI agent model designed to fully automate the process of conducting Systematic Literature Reviews. The model operates through a user-friendly interface where researchers input their topic. It generates a search string used to retrieve relevant academic papers. The model then autonomously summarizes the abstracts of these papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T10:27:52Z)
• Automating the Information Extraction from Semi-Structured Interview Transcripts [0.0]
  This paper explores the development and application of an automated system designed to extract information from semi-structured interview transcripts. We present a user-friendly software prototype that enables researchers to efficiently process and visualize the thematic structure of interview data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T13:53:03Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
  This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews. The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised. This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• Zero-shot Generative Large Language Models for Systematic Review Screening Automation [55.403958106416574]
  This study investigates the effectiveness of using zero-shot large language models for automatic screening. We evaluate the effectiveness of eight different LLMs and investigate a calibration technique that uses a predefined recall threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T01:54:08Z)
• Application of Transformers based methods in Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Literature Review [77.34726150561087]
  This work presents a systematic literature review of state-of-the-art advances using transformer-based methods on electronic medical records (EMRs) in different NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T22:19:42Z)
• Bayesian Network Models of Causal Interventions in Healthcare Decision Making: Literature Review and Software Evaluation [16.997060715857987]
  This report summarises the outcomes of a systematic literature search to identify Bayesian network models used to support decision making in healthcare. The selected research papers are briefly reviewed, with the view to identify publicly available models and datasets that are well suited to analysis using the causal interventional analysis software tool developed in Wang B, Lyle C, Kwiatkowska M.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T12:22:07Z)
• Discover, Explanation, Improvement: An Automatic Slice Detection Framework for Natural Language Processing [72.14557106085284]
  slice detection models (SDM) automatically identify underperforming groups of datapoints. This paper proposes a benchmark named "Discover, Explain, improve (DEIM)" for classification NLP tasks. Our evaluation shows that Edisa can accurately select error-prone datapoints with informative semantic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T19:00:00Z)
• Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summary [65.37544133256499]
  We propose a metric to evaluate the content quality of a summary using question-answering (QA) We demonstrate the experimental benefits of QA-based metrics through an analysis of our proposed metric, QAEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T15:33:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.