Double Robust Bayesian Inference on Average Treatment Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16298v5
• Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:23:35 GMT
• Title: Double Robust Bayesian Inference on Average Treatment Effects
• Authors: Christoph Breunig, Ruixuan Liu, Zhengfei Yu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a double robust Bayesian inference procedure on the average treatment effect (ATE) under unconfoundedness. For our new Bayesian approach, we first adjust the prior distributions of the conditional mean functions, and then correct the posterior distribution of the resulting ATE.
• Score: 2.458652618559425
• License:
• Abstract: We propose a double robust Bayesian inference procedure on the average treatment effect (ATE) under unconfoundedness. For our new Bayesian approach, we first adjust the prior distributions of the conditional mean functions, and then correct the posterior distribution of the resulting ATE. Both adjustments make use of pilot estimators motivated by the semiparametric influence function for ATE estimation. We prove asymptotic equivalence of our Bayesian procedure and efficient frequentist ATE estimators by establishing a new semiparametric Bernstein-von Mises theorem under double robustness; i.e., the lack of smoothness of conditional mean functions can be compensated by high regularity of the propensity score and vice versa. Consequently, the resulting Bayesian credible sets form confidence intervals with asymptotically exact coverage probability. In simulations, our method provides precise point estimates of the ATE through the posterior mean and credible intervals that closely align with the nominal coverage probability. Furthermore, our approach achieves a shorter interval length in comparison to existing methods. We illustrate our method in an application to the National Supported Work Demonstration following LaLonde [1986] and Dehejia and Wahba [1999].

Related papers

• In-Context Parametric Inference: Point or Distribution Estimators? [66.22308335324239]
  We show that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems. Our experiments indicate that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T10:00:24Z)
• Gaussian and Bootstrap Approximation for Matching-based Average Treatment Effect Estimators [12.818275315985971]
  We quantify the impact of key problem parameters, including the number of matches and treatment balance, on the accuracy of the Gaussian approximation. Our work not only introduces a novel theoretical framework for commonly used ATE estimators, but also provides data-driven methods for constructing non-asymptotically valid confidence intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T22:47:31Z)
• Semiparametric Bayesian Difference-in-Differences [2.458652618559425]
  We study semiparametric Bayesian inference for the average treatment effect on the treatedATT within the difference-in-differences research design. We propose two new Bayesian methods with frequentist validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T20:41:36Z)
• Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
  We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution. Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z)
• Semiparametric Efficient Inference in Adaptive Experiments [29.43493007296859]
  We consider the problem of efficient inference of the Average Treatment Effect in a sequential experiment where the policy governing the assignment of subjects to treatment or control can change over time. We first provide a central limit theorem for the Adaptive Augmented Inverse-Probability Weighted estimator, which is semi efficient, under weaker assumptions than those previously made in the literature. We then consider sequential inference setting, deriving both propensity and nonasymptotic confidence sequences that are considerably tighter than previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T06:25:06Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• A Mean Field Approach to Empirical Bayes Estimation in High-dimensional Linear Regression [8.345523969593492]
  We study empirical Bayes estimation in high-dimensional linear regression. We adopt a variational empirical Bayes approach, introduced originally in Carbonetto and Stephens (2012) and Kim et al. (2022). This provides the first rigorous empirical Bayes method in a high-dimensional regression setting without sparsity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T20:51:40Z)
• A Bayesian Semiparametric Method For Estimating Causal Quantile Effects [1.1118668841431563]
  We propose a semiparametric conditional distribution regression model that allows inference on any functionals of counterfactual distributions. We show via simulations that the use of double balancing score for confounding adjustment improves performance over adjusting for any single score alone. We apply the proposed method to the North Carolina birth weight dataset to analyze the effect of maternal smoking on infant's birth weight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T05:15:18Z)
• Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approach [94.10051154390237]
  Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. We show that this robust optimization approach can extend a wide range of causal adjustment methods to perform partial identification. Across synthetic and real datasets, we find that this approach provides ATE bounds with a higher coverage probability than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T04:24:26Z)
• Variational Refinement for Importance Sampling Using the Forward Kullback-Leibler Divergence [77.06203118175335]
  Variational Inference (VI) is a popular alternative to exact sampling in Bayesian inference. Importance sampling (IS) is often used to fine-tune and de-bias the estimates of approximate Bayesian inference procedures. We propose a novel combination of optimization and sampling techniques for approximate Bayesian inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T11:00:24Z)
• CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation [107.86876722777535]
  We study high-confidence behavior-agnostic off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. We show in a variety of benchmarks that the confidence interval estimates are tighter and more accurate than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T12:39:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.