Semiparametric Bayesian Difference-in-Differences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04605v2
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:49:59 GMT
• Title: Semiparametric Bayesian Difference-in-Differences
• Authors: Christoph Breunig, Ruixuan Liu, Zhengfei Yu,
• Abstract summary: We study semiparametric Bayesian inference for the average treatment effect on the treatedATT within the difference-in-differences research design. We propose two new Bayesian methods with frequentist validity.
• Score: 2.458652618559425
• License:
• Abstract: This paper studies semiparametric Bayesian inference for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) within the difference-in-differences research design. We propose two new Bayesian methods with frequentist validity. The first one places a standard Gaussian process prior on the conditional mean function of the control group. We obtain asymptotic equivalence of our Bayesian estimator and an efficient frequentist estimator by establishing a semiparametric Bernstein-von Mises (BvM) theorem. The second method is a double robust Bayesian procedure that adjusts the prior distribution of the conditional mean function and subsequently corrects the posterior distribution of the resulting ATT. We establish a semiparametric BvM result under double robust smoothness conditions; i.e., the lack of smoothness of conditional mean functions can be compensated by high regularity of the propensity score, and vice versa. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application demonstrate that the proposed Bayesian DiD methods exhibit strong finite-sample performance compared to existing frequentist methods. Finally, we outline an extension to difference-in-differences with multiple periods and staggered entry.

Related papers

• In-Context Parametric Inference: Point or Distribution Estimators? [66.22308335324239]
  We show that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems. Our experiments indicate that amortized point estimators generally outperform posterior inference, though the latter remain competitive in some low-dimensional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T10:00:24Z)
• Online Covariance Estimation in Nonsmooth Stochastic Approximation [14.818683408659764]
  We consider applying approximation (SA) methods to solve nonsmooth variational inclusion problems. Our convergence construction establish the best-known for statistical estimation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T20:16:51Z)
• Maximum a Posteriori Inference for Factor Graphs via Benders' Decomposition [0.38233569758620056]
  We present a method for maximum a-posteriori inference in general Bayesian factor models. We derive MAP estimation algorithms for the Bayesian Gaussian mixture model and latent Dirichlet allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T19:57:56Z)
• Semiparametric Efficient Inference in Adaptive Experiments [29.43493007296859]
  We consider the problem of efficient inference of the Average Treatment Effect in a sequential experiment where the policy governing the assignment of subjects to treatment or control can change over time. We first provide a central limit theorem for the Adaptive Augmented Inverse-Probability Weighted estimator, which is semi efficient, under weaker assumptions than those previously made in the literature. We then consider sequential inference setting, deriving both propensity and nonasymptotic confidence sequences that are considerably tighter than previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T06:25:06Z)
• First Order Methods with Markovian Noise: from Acceleration to Variational Inequalities [91.46841922915418]
  We present a unified approach for the theoretical analysis of first-order variation methods. Our approach covers both non-linear gradient and strongly Monte Carlo problems. We provide bounds that match the oracle strongly in the case of convex method optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T11:11:31Z)
• Double Robust Bayesian Inference on Average Treatment Effects [2.458652618559425]
  We propose a double robust Bayesian inference procedure on the average treatment effect (ATE) under unconfoundedness. For our new Bayesian approach, we first adjust the prior distributions of the conditional mean functions, and then correct the posterior distribution of the resulting ATE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T15:32:25Z)
• Efficient CDF Approximations for Normalizing Flows [64.60846767084877]
  We build upon the diffeomorphic properties of normalizing flows to estimate the cumulative distribution function (CDF) over a closed region. Our experiments on popular flow architectures and UCI datasets show a marked improvement in sample efficiency as compared to traditional estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T06:11:49Z)
• Variational Refinement for Importance Sampling Using the Forward Kullback-Leibler Divergence [77.06203118175335]
  Variational Inference (VI) is a popular alternative to exact sampling in Bayesian inference. Importance sampling (IS) is often used to fine-tune and de-bias the estimates of approximate Bayesian inference procedures. We propose a novel combination of optimization and sampling techniques for approximate Bayesian inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T11:00:24Z)
• Reducing the Amortization Gap in Variational Autoencoders: A Bayesian Random Function Approach [38.45568741734893]
  Inference in our GP model is done by a single feed forward pass through the network, significantly faster than semi-amortized methods. We show that our approach attains higher test data likelihood than the state-of-the-arts on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T13:01:12Z)
• Batch Stationary Distribution Estimation [98.18201132095066]
  We consider the problem of approximating the stationary distribution of an ergodic Markov chain given a set of sampled transitions. We propose a consistent estimator that is based on recovering a correction ratio function over the given data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T09:10:01Z)
• Distributed Averaging Methods for Randomized Second Order Optimization [54.51566432934556]
  We consider distributed optimization problems where forming the Hessian is computationally challenging and communication is a bottleneck. We develop unbiased parameter averaging methods for randomized second order optimization that employ sampling and sketching of the Hessian. We also extend the framework of second order averaging methods to introduce an unbiased distributed optimization framework for heterogeneous computing systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-16T09:01:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.