Crowd Density Estimation using Imperfect Labels

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01450v2
• Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:09:14 GMT
• Title: Crowd Density Estimation using Imperfect Labels
• Authors: Muhammad Asif Khan, Hamid Menouar, and Ridha Hamila
• Abstract summary: We propose a system that automatically generates imperfect labels using a deep learning model (called annotator) Our analysis on two crowd counting models and two benchmark datasets shows that the proposed scheme achieves accuracy closer to that of the model trained with perfect labels.
• Score: 3.2575001434344286
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Density estimation is one of the most widely used methods for crowd counting in which a deep learning model learns from head-annotated crowd images to estimate crowd density in unseen images. Typically, the learning performance of the model is highly impacted by the accuracy of the annotations and inaccurate annotations may lead to localization and counting errors during prediction. A significant amount of works exist on crowd counting using perfectly labelled datasets but none of these explore the impact of annotation errors on the model accuracy. In this paper, we investigate the impact of imperfect labels (both noisy and missing labels) on crowd counting accuracy. We propose a system that automatically generates imperfect labels using a deep learning model (called annotator) which are then used to train a new crowd counting model (target model). Our analysis on two crowd counting models and two benchmark datasets shows that the proposed scheme achieves accuracy closer to that of the model trained with perfect labels showing the robustness of crowd models to annotation errors.

Related papers

• Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantification [5.184615738004059]
  We develop novel, model-agnostic algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification-Based Label Error Detection (UQ-LED) Our UQ-LED algorithms outperform state-of-the-art confident learning in identifying label errors. We propose a novel approach to generate realistic, class-dependent label errors synthetically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T15:17:52Z)
• Robust Zero-Shot Crowd Counting and Localization With Adaptive Resolution SAM [55.93697196726016]
  We propose a simple yet effective crowd counting method by utilizing the Segment-Everything-Everywhere Model (SEEM) We show that SEEM's performance in dense crowd scenes is limited, primarily due to the omission of many persons in high-density areas. Our proposed method achieves the best unsupervised performance in crowd counting, while also being comparable to some supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T13:55:17Z)
• Virtual Category Learning: A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for Dense Prediction with Extremely Limited Labels [63.16824565919966]
  This paper proposes to use confusing samples proactively without label correction. A Virtual Category (VC) is assigned to each confusing sample in such a way that it can safely contribute to the model optimisation. Our intriguing findings highlight the usage of VC learning in dense vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T16:23:52Z)
• Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting with Contextual Modeling: Facilitating Holistic Understanding of Crowd Scenes [19.987151025364067]
  This paper presents a new semi-supervised method for training a reliable crowd counting model. We foster the model's intrinsic'subitizing' capability, which allows it to accurately estimate the count in regions. Our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance, surpassing previous approaches by a large margin on challenging benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T12:42:43Z)
• Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any model [19.84626033109009]
  We study methods to score label quality, such that the images with the lowest scores are least likely to be correctly labeled. This helps prioritize what data to review in order to ensure a high-quality training/evaluation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:29:09Z)
• Semi-supervised Deep Learning for Image Classification with Distribution Mismatch: A Survey [1.5469452301122175]
  Deep learning models rely on the abundance of labelled observations to train a prospective model. It is expensive to gather labelled observations of data, making the usage of deep learning models not ideal. In many situations different unlabelled data sources might be available. This raises the risk of a significant distribution mismatch between the labelled and unlabelled datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T02:46:00Z)
• Towards Good Practices for Efficiently Annotating Large-Scale Image Classification Datasets [90.61266099147053]
  We investigate efficient annotation strategies for collecting multi-class classification labels for a large collection of images. We propose modifications and best practices aimed at minimizing human labeling effort. Simulated experiments on a 125k image subset of the ImageNet100 show that it can be annotated to 80% top-1 accuracy with 0.35 annotations per image on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T16:29:32Z)
• Defuse: Harnessing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples for Debugging Models Beyond Test Accuracy [11.265020351747916]
  Defuse is a method to automatically discover and correct model errors beyond those available in test data. We propose an algorithm inspired by adversarial machine learning techniques that uses a generative model to find naturally occurring instances misclassified by a model. Defuse corrects the error after fine-tuning while maintaining generalization on the test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T18:08:42Z)
• Completely Self-Supervised Crowd Counting via Distribution Matching [92.09218454377395]
  We propose a complete self-supervision approach to training models for dense crowd counting. The only input required to train, apart from a large set of unlabeled crowd images, is the approximate upper limit of the crowd count. Our method dwells on the idea that natural crowds follow a power law distribution, which could be leveraged to yield error signals for backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T13:20:12Z)
• One-bit Supervision for Image Classification [121.87598671087494]
  One-bit supervision is a novel setting of learning from incomplete annotations. We propose a multi-stage training paradigm which incorporates negative label suppression into an off-the-shelf semi-supervised learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T03:06:23Z)
• Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting via Self-Training on Surrogate Tasks [50.78037828213118]
  This paper tackles the semi-supervised crowd counting problem from the perspective of feature learning. We propose a novel semi-supervised crowd counting method which is built upon two innovative components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T05:30:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.