General multi-fidelity surrogate models: Framework and active learning strategies for efficient rare event simulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03375v1
• Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 00:03:21 GMT
• Title: General multi-fidelity surrogate models: Framework and active learning strategies for efficient rare event simulation
• Authors: Promit Chakroborty, Somayajulu L. N. Dhulipala, Yifeng Che, Wen Jiang, Benjamin W. Spencer, Jason D. Hales, Michael D. Shields
• Abstract summary: Estimating the probability of failure for complex real-world systems is often prohibitively expensive. This paper presents a robust multi-fidelity surrogate modeling strategy. It is shown to be highly accurate while drastically reducing the number of high-fidelity model calls.
• Score: 1.708673732699217
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Estimating the probability of failure for complex real-world systems using high-fidelity computational models is often prohibitively expensive, especially when the probability is small. Exploiting low-fidelity models can make this process more feasible, but merging information from multiple low-fidelity and high-fidelity models poses several challenges. This paper presents a robust multi-fidelity surrogate modeling strategy in which the multi-fidelity surrogate is assembled using an active learning strategy using an on-the-fly model adequacy assessment set within a subset simulation framework for efficient reliability analysis. The multi-fidelity surrogate is assembled by first applying a Gaussian process correction to each low-fidelity model and assigning a model probability based on the model's local predictive accuracy and cost. Three strategies are proposed to fuse these individual surrogates into an overall surrogate model based on model averaging and deterministic/stochastic model selection. The strategies also dictate which model evaluations are necessary. No assumptions are made about the relationships between low-fidelity models, while the high-fidelity model is assumed to be the most accurate and most computationally expensive model. Through two analytical and two numerical case studies, including a case study evaluating the failure probability of Tristructural isotropic-coated (TRISO) nuclear fuels, the algorithm is shown to be highly accurate while drastically reducing the number of high-fidelity model calls (and hence computational cost).

Related papers

• Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models [0.34592277400656235]
  Multi-fidelity machine learning methods integrate scarce, resource-intensive high-fidelity data with abundant but less accurate low-fidelity data. We propose a practical multi-fidelity strategy for problems spanning low- and high-dimensional domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T10:40:50Z)
• Model-Based RL for Mean-Field Games is not Statistically Harder than Single-Agent RL [57.745700271150454]
  We study the sample complexity of reinforcement learning in Mean-Field Games (MFGs) with model-based function approximation. We introduce the Partial Model-Based Eluder Dimension (P-MBED), a more effective notion to characterize the model class complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T14:54:47Z)
• Uncertainty-aware multi-fidelity surrogate modeling with noisy data [0.0]
  In real-world applications, uncertainty is present in both high- and low-fidelity models due to measurement or numerical noise. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for multi-fidelity surrogate modeling that handles noise-contaminated data. The proposed framework offers a natural approach to combining physical experiments and computational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T08:37:41Z)
• Deciding What to Model: Value-Equivalent Sampling for Reinforcement Learning [21.931580762349096]
  We introduce an algorithm that computes an approximately-value-equivalent, lossy compression of the environment which an agent may feasibly target in lieu of the true model. We prove an information-theoretic, Bayesian regret bound for our algorithm that holds for any finite-horizon, episodic sequential decision-making problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T23:36:38Z)
• Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Model-Based Actor-Critic [67.00475077281212]
  Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts. We propose a novel approach that achieves high sample efficiency without the strong reliance on accurate learned models. We show that CMBAC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of sample efficiency on several challenging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T15:33:11Z)
• Adaptive Reliability Analysis for Multi-fidelity Models using a Collective Learning Strategy [6.368679897630892]
  This study presents a new approach called adaptive multi-fidelity Gaussian process for reliability analysis (AMGPRA) It is shown that the proposed method achieves similar or higher accuracy with reduced computational costs compared to state-of-the-art single and multi-fidelity methods. A key application of AMGPRA is high-fidelity fragility modeling using complex and costly physics-based computational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T14:42:58Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)
• Context-aware surrogate modeling for balancing approximation and sampling costs in multi-fidelity importance sampling and Bayesian inverse problems [0.0]
  Multi-fidelity methods leverage low-cost surrogate models to speed up computations. Because surrogate and high-fidelity models are used together, poor predictions by surrogate models can be compensated with frequent recourse to high-fidelity models. This work considers multi-fidelity importance sampling and theoretically and computationally trades off increasing the fidelity of surrogate models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T13:31:51Z)
• Robust Finite Mixture Regression for Heterogeneous Targets [70.19798470463378]
  We propose an FMR model that finds sample clusters and jointly models multiple incomplete mixed-type targets simultaneously. We provide non-asymptotic oracle performance bounds for our model under a high-dimensional learning framework. The results show that our model can achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T03:27:07Z)
• On the model-based stochastic value gradient for continuous reinforcement learning [50.085645237597056]
  We show that simple model-based agents can outperform state-of-the-art model-free agents in terms of both sample-efficiency and final reward. Our findings suggest that model-based policy evaluation deserves closer attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T17:58:29Z)
• Hybrid modeling: Applications in real-time diagnosis [64.5040763067757]
  We outline a novel hybrid modeling approach that combines machine learning inspired models and physics-based models. We are using such models for real-time diagnosis applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T00:44:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.