Adaptive Reliability Analysis for Multi-fidelity Models using a
Collective Learning Strategy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10219v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:42:58 GMT
- Title: Adaptive Reliability Analysis for Multi-fidelity Models using a
Collective Learning Strategy
- Authors: Chi Zhang, Chaolin Song and Abdollah Shafieezadeh
- Abstract summary: This study presents a new approach called adaptive multi-fidelity Gaussian process for reliability analysis (AMGPRA)
It is shown that the proposed method achieves similar or higher accuracy with reduced computational costs compared to state-of-the-art single and multi-fidelity methods.
A key application of AMGPRA is high-fidelity fragility modeling using complex and costly physics-based computational models.
- Score: 6.368679897630892
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In many fields of science and engineering, models with different fidelities
are available. Physical experiments or detailed simulations that accurately
capture the behavior of the system are regarded as high-fidelity models with
low model uncertainty, however, they are expensive to run. On the other hand,
simplified physical experiments or numerical models are seen as low-fidelity
models that are cheaper to evaluate. Although low-fidelity models are often not
suitable for direct use in reliability analysis due to their low accuracy, they
can offer information about the trend of the high-fidelity model thus providing
the opportunity to explore the design space at a low cost. This study presents
a new approach called adaptive multi-fidelity Gaussian process for reliability
analysis (AMGPRA). Contrary to selecting training points and information
sources in two separate stages as done in state-of-the-art mfEGRA method, the
proposed approach finds the optimal training point and information source
simultaneously using the novel collective learning function (CLF). CLF is able
to assess the global impact of a candidate training point from an information
source and it accommodates any learning function that satisfies a certain
profile. In this context, CLF provides a new direction for quantifying the
impact of new training points and can be easily extended with new learning
functions to adapt to different reliability problems. The performance of the
proposed method is demonstrated by three mathematical examples and one
engineering problem concerning the wind reliability of transmission towers. It
is shown that the proposed method achieves similar or higher accuracy with
reduced computational costs compared to state-of-the-art single and
multi-fidelity methods. A key application of AMGPRA is high-fidelity fragility
modeling using complex and costly physics-based computational models.
Related papers
- Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models [0.34592277400656235]
Multi-fidelity machine learning methods integrate scarce, resource-intensive high-fidelity data with abundant but less accurate low-fidelity data.
We propose a practical multi-fidelity strategy for problems spanning low- and high-dimensional domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-21T10:40:50Z) - Towards Stable Machine Learning Model Retraining via Slowly Varying Sequences [6.067007470552307]
We propose a methodology for finding sequences of machine learning models that are stable across retraining iterations.
We develop a mixed-integer optimization formulation that is guaranteed to recover optimal models.
Our method shows stronger stability than greedily trained models with a small, controllable sacrifice in predictive power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T22:45:38Z) - Multifidelity linear regression for scientific machine learning from scarce data [0.0]
We propose a new multifidelity training approach for scientific machine learning via linear regression.
We provide bias and variance analysis of our new estimators that guarantee the approach's accuracy and improved robustness to scarce high-fidelity data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T15:40:17Z) - The Risk of Federated Learning to Skew Fine-Tuning Features and
Underperform Out-of-Distribution Robustness [50.52507648690234]
Federated learning has the risk of skewing fine-tuning features and compromising the robustness of the model.
We introduce three robustness indicators and conduct experiments across diverse robust datasets.
Our approach markedly enhances the robustness across diverse scenarios, encompassing various parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-25T09:18:51Z) - Federated Learning with Projected Trajectory Regularization [65.6266768678291]
Federated learning enables joint training of machine learning models from distributed clients without sharing their local data.
One key challenge in federated learning is to handle non-identically distributed data across the clients.
We propose a novel federated learning framework with projected trajectory regularization (FedPTR) for tackling the data issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T02:12:08Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - Disentangled Multi-Fidelity Deep Bayesian Active Learning [19.031567953748453]
Multi-fidelity active learning aims to learn a direct mapping from input parameters to simulation outputs at the highest fidelity.
Deep learning-based methods often impose a hierarchical structure in hidden representations, which only supports passing information from low-fidelity to high-fidelity.
We propose a novel framework called Disentangled Multi-fidelity Deep Bayesian Active Learning (D-MFDAL), which learns the surrogate models conditioned on the distribution of functions at multiple fidelities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-07T23:14:58Z) - General multi-fidelity surrogate models: Framework and active learning
strategies for efficient rare event simulation [1.708673732699217]
Estimating the probability of failure for complex real-world systems is often prohibitively expensive.
This paper presents a robust multi-fidelity surrogate modeling strategy.
It is shown to be highly accurate while drastically reducing the number of high-fidelity model calls.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-07T00:03:21Z) - Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Model-Based
Actor-Critic [67.00475077281212]
Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts.
We propose a novel approach that achieves high sample efficiency without the strong reliance on accurate learned models.
We show that CMBAC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of sample efficiency on several challenging tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T15:33:11Z) - Federated Learning with Unreliable Clients: Performance Analysis and
Mechanism Design [76.29738151117583]
Federated Learning (FL) has become a promising tool for training effective machine learning models among distributed clients.
However, low quality models could be uploaded to the aggregator server by unreliable clients, leading to a degradation or even a collapse of training.
We model these unreliable behaviors of clients and propose a defensive mechanism to mitigate such a security risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T08:02:27Z) - Model-Augmented Q-learning [112.86795579978802]
We propose a MFRL framework that is augmented with the components of model-based RL.
Specifically, we propose to estimate not only the $Q$-values but also both the transition and the reward with a shared network.
We show that the proposed scheme, called Model-augmented $Q$-learning (MQL), obtains a policy-invariant solution which is identical to the solution obtained by learning with true reward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-07T17:56:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.