MetaStackVis: Visually-Assisted Performance Evaluation of Metamodels
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03539v3
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:14:17 GMT
- Title: MetaStackVis: Visually-Assisted Performance Evaluation of Metamodels
- Authors: Ilya Ploshchik, Angelos Chatzimparmpas, Andreas Kerren,
- Abstract summary: This paper investigates the impact of alternative metamodels on the performance of stacking ensembles using a novel visualization tool, called MetaStackVis.
Our interactive tool helps users to visually explore different singular and pairs of metamodels according to their predictive probabilities and multiple validation metrics, as well as their ability to predict specific problematic data instances.
- Score: 3.5229503563299915
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Stacking (or stacked generalization) is an ensemble learning method with one main distinctiveness from the rest: even though several base models are trained on the original data set, their predictions are further used as input data for one or more metamodels arranged in at least one extra layer. Composing a stack of models can produce high-performance outcomes, but it usually involves a trial-and-error process. Therefore, our previously developed visual analytics system, StackGenVis, was mainly designed to assist users in choosing a set of top-performing and diverse models by measuring their predictive performance. However, it only employs a single logistic regression metamodel. In this paper, we investigate the impact of alternative metamodels on the performance of stacking ensembles using a novel visualization tool, called MetaStackVis. Our interactive tool helps users to visually explore different singular and pairs of metamodels according to their predictive probabilities and multiple validation metrics, as well as their ability to predict specific problematic data instances. MetaStackVis was evaluated with a usage scenario based on a medical data set and via expert interviews.
Related papers
- LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.
LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.
We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z) - Diffusion Models as Data Mining Tools [87.77999285241219]
This paper demonstrates how to use generative models trained for image synthesis as tools for visual data mining.
We show that after finetuning conditional diffusion models to synthesize images from a specific dataset, we can use these models to define a typicality measure.
This measure assesses how typical visual elements are for different data labels, such as geographic location, time stamps, semantic labels, or even the presence of a disease.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T17:14:31Z) - Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling [9.263562546969695]
We show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models.
Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T22:27:24Z) - Deciphering AutoML Ensembles: cattleia's Assistance in Decision-Making [0.0]
Cattleia is an application that deciphers the ensembles for regression, multiclass, and binary classification tasks.
It works with models built by three AutoML packages: auto-sklearn, AutoGluon, and FLAML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T11:56:21Z) - Forecasting Early with Meta Learning [4.750521042508541]
We devise a Meta learning method that exploits samples from additional datasets and learns to augment time series through adversarial learning as an auxiliary task for the target dataset.
Our model (FEML) is equipped with a shared Convolutional backbone that learns features for varying length inputs from different datasets and has dataset specific heads to forecast for different output lengths.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T07:30:01Z) - A Graph-Enhanced Click Model for Web Search [67.27218481132185]
We propose a novel graph-enhanced click model (GraphCM) for web search.
We exploit both intra-session and inter-session information for the sparsity and cold-start problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-17T08:32:43Z) - ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented
Visual Models [102.63817106363597]
We build ELEVATER, the first benchmark to compare and evaluate pre-trained language-augmented visual models.
It consists of 20 image classification datasets and 35 object detection datasets, each of which is augmented with external knowledge.
We will release our toolkit and evaluation platforms for the research community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-19T10:23:42Z) - Beyond Accuracy: A Consolidated Tool for Visual Question Answering
Benchmarking [30.155625852894797]
We propose a browser-based benchmarking tool for researchers and challenge organizers.
Our tool helps test generalization capabilities of models across multiple datasets.
Interactive filtering facilitates discovery of problematic behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T11:08:35Z) - Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task.
The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them.
By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z) - StackGenVis: Alignment of Data, Algorithms, and Models for Stacking Ensemble Learning Using Performance Metrics [4.237343083490243]
In machine learning (ML), ensemble methods such as bagging, boosting, and stacking are widely-established approaches.
StackGenVis is a visual analytics system for stacked generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-04T15:43:55Z) - Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples.
We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries.
We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.