Explanation Regeneration via Information Bottleneck

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09603v2
• Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 05:17:19 GMT
• Title: Explanation Regeneration via Information Bottleneck
• Authors: Qintong Li, Zhiyong Wu, Lingpeng Kong, Wei Bi
• Abstract summary: We develop an information bottleneck method EIB to produce refined explanations that are sufficient and concise. Our approach regenerates the free-text explanation by polishing the single-pass output from the pretrained language model.
• Score: 29.92996769997743
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Explaining the black-box predictions of NLP models naturally and accurately is an important open problem in natural language generation. These free-text explanations are expected to contain sufficient and carefully-selected evidence to form supportive arguments for predictions. Due to the superior generative capacity of large pretrained language models, recent work built on prompt engineering enables explanation generation without specific training. However, explanation generated through single-pass prompting often lacks sufficiency and conciseness. To address this problem, we develop an information bottleneck method EIB to produce refined explanations that are sufficient and concise. Our approach regenerates the free-text explanation by polishing the single-pass output from the pretrained language model but retaining the information that supports the contents being explained. Experiments on two out-of-domain tasks verify the effectiveness of EIB through automatic evaluation and thoroughly-conducted human evaluation.

Related papers

• XForecast: Evaluating Natural Language Explanations for Time Series Forecasting [72.57427992446698]
  Time series forecasting aids decision-making, especially for stakeholders who rely on accurate predictions. Traditional explainable AI (XAI) methods, which underline feature or temporal importance, often require expert knowledge. evaluating forecast NLEs is difficult due to the complex causal relationships in time series data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:16:39Z)
• Towards More Faithful Natural Language Explanation Using Multi-Level Contrastive Learning in VQA [7.141288053123662]
  Natural language explanation in visual question answer (VQA-NLE) aims to explain the decision-making process of models by generating natural language sentences to increase users' trust in the black-box systems. Existing post-hoc explanations are not always aligned with human logical inference, suffering from the issues on: 1) Deductive unsatisfiability, the generated explanations do not logically lead to the answer; 2) Factual inconsistency, the model falsifies its counterfactual explanation for answers without considering the facts in images; and 3) Semantic perturbation insensitivity, the model can not recognize the semantic changes caused by small perturbations
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T05:51:55Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Parallel Sentence-Level Explanation Generation for Real-World Low-Resource Scenarios [18.5713713816771]
  This paper is the first to explore the problem smoothly from weak-supervised learning to unsupervised learning. We propose a non-autoregressive interpretable model to facilitate parallel explanation generation and simultaneous prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T14:52:21Z)
• Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Better [61.991772773700006]
  We show that our method can consistently and significantly outperform finetuning baselines across different settings. As a side benefit, human evaluation shows that our method can generate high-quality explanations to justify its predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T04:50:02Z)
• The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-Shot In-Context Learning [50.77996380021221]
  We focus on two NLP tasks that involve reasoning over text, namely question answering and natural language inference. We show that explanations judged as good by humans--those that are logically consistent with the input--usually indicate more accurate predictions. We present a framework for calibrating model predictions based on the reliability of the explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T17:57:58Z)
• NoiER: An Approach for Training more Reliable Fine-TunedDownstream Task Models [54.184609286094044]
  We propose noise entropy regularisation (NoiER) as an efficient learning paradigm that solves the problem without auxiliary models and additional data. The proposed approach improved traditional OOD detection evaluation metrics by 55% on average compared to the original fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-29T06:58:28Z)
• Explain and Predict, and then Predict Again [6.865156063241553]
  We propose ExPred, that uses multi-task learning in the explanation generation phase effectively trading-off explanation and prediction losses. We conduct an extensive evaluation of our approach on three diverse language datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T19:36:52Z)
• Towards Interpretable Natural Language Understanding with Explanations as Latent Variables [146.83882632854485]
  We develop a framework for interpretable natural language understanding that requires only a small set of human annotated explanations for training. Our framework treats natural language explanations as latent variables that model the underlying reasoning process of a neural model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T02:05:56Z)
• WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictions [38.59658315243017]
  We leverage the text-to-text framework proposed by Raffel et al.( 2019) to train language models to output a natural text explanation alongside their prediction. We show that this approach not only obtains state-of-the-art results on explainability, but also permits learning from a limited set of labeled explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T02:20:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.