Out-of-sample scoring and automatic selection of causal estimators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10076v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:29:18 GMT
• Title: Out-of-sample scoring and automatic selection of causal estimators
• Authors: Egor Kraev, Timo Flesch, Hudson Taylor Lekunze, Mark Harley, Pere Planell Morell
• Abstract summary: We propose novel scoring approaches for both the CATE case and an important subset of instrumental variable problems. We implement that in an open source package that relies on DoWhy and EconML libraries.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, many causal estimators for Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) and instrumental variable (IV) problems have been published and open sourced, allowing to estimate granular impact of both randomized treatments (such as A/B tests) and of user choices on the outcomes of interest. However, the practical application of such models has ben hampered by the lack of a valid way to score the performance of such models out of sample, in order to select the best one for a given application. We address that gap by proposing novel scoring approaches for both the CATE case and an important subset of instrumental variable problems, namely those where the instrumental variable is customer acces to a product feature, and the treatment is the customer's choice to use that feature. Being able to score model performance out of sample allows us to apply hyperparameter optimization methods to causal model selection and tuning. We implement that in an open source package that relies on DoWhy and EconML libraries for implementation of causal inference models (and also includes a Transformed Outcome model implementation), and on FLAML for hyperparameter optimization and for component models used in the causal models. We demonstrate on synthetic data that optimizing the proposed scores is a reliable method for choosing the model and its hyperparameter values, whose estimates are close to the true impact, in the randomized CATE and IV cases. Further, we provide examles of applying these methods to real customer data from Wise.

Related papers

• Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
  Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling. Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability. In this paper, we aim to help address such challenges by developing an textitinfluence functions framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z)
• On the Laplace Approximation as Model Selection Criterion for Gaussian Processes [6.990493129893112]
  We introduce multiple metrics based on the Laplace approximation. Experiments show that our metrics are comparable in quality to the gold standard dynamic nested sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T09:28:28Z)
• Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Selecting Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimators [19.053826145863113]
  This paper introduces a Distributionally Robust Metric (DRM) for CATE estimator selection. DRM is nuisance-free, eliminating the need to fit models for nuisance parameters. It effectively prioritizes the selection of a distributionally robust CATE estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T15:12:24Z)
• Causal Q-Aggregation for CATE Model Selection [24.094860486378167]
  We propose a new CATE ensembling approach based on Qaggregation using the doubly robust loss. Our main result shows that causal Q-aggregation achieves statistically optimal model selection regret rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T19:27:05Z)
• Self-Supervised Dataset Distillation for Transfer Learning [77.4714995131992]
  We propose a novel problem of distilling an unlabeled dataset into a set of small synthetic samples for efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) We first prove that a gradient of synthetic samples with respect to a SSL objective in naive bilevel optimization is textitbiased due to randomness originating from data augmentations or masking. We empirically validate the effectiveness of our method on various applications involving transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:48:52Z)
• Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
  In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle. While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples. This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimation [24.65301562548798]
  We study the problem of model selection in causal inference, specifically for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. We conduct an empirical analysis to benchmark the surrogate model selection metrics introduced in the literature, as well as the novel ones introduced in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T16:26:06Z)
• Error-based Knockoffs Inference for Controlled Feature Selection [49.99321384855201]
  We propose an error-based knockoff inference method by integrating the knockoff features, the error-based feature importance statistics, and the stepdown procedure together. The proposed inference procedure does not require specifying a regression model and can handle feature selection with theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T01:55:59Z)
• Variational Inference with NoFAS: Normalizing Flow with Adaptive Surrogate for Computationally Expensive Models [7.217783736464403]
  Use of sampling-based approaches such as Markov chain Monte Carlo may become intractable when each likelihood evaluation is computationally expensive. New approaches combining variational inference with normalizing flow are characterized by a computational cost that grows only linearly with the dimensionality of the latent variable space. We propose Normalizing Flow with Adaptive Surrogate (NoFAS), an optimization strategy that alternatively updates the normalizing flow parameters and the weights of a neural network surrogate model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-28T14:31:45Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Selecting Treatment Effects Models for Domain Adaptation Using Causal Knowledge [82.5462771088607]
  We propose a novel model selection metric specifically designed for ITE methods under the unsupervised domain adaptation setting. In particular, we propose selecting models whose predictions of interventions' effects satisfy known causal structures in the target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T21:03:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.