Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Selecting Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18392v2
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:08:36 GMT
• Title: Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Selecting Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimators
• Authors: Yiyan Huang, Cheuk Hang Leung, Siyi Wang, Yijun Li, Qi Wu,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a Distributionally Robust Metric (DRM) for CATE estimator selection. DRM is nuisance-free, eliminating the need to fit models for nuisance parameters. It effectively prioritizes the selection of a distributionally robust CATE estimator.
• Score: 19.053826145863113
• License:
• Abstract: The growing demand for personalized decision-making has led to a surge of interest in estimating the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE). Various types of CATE estimators have been developed with advancements in machine learning and causal inference. However, selecting the desirable CATE estimator through a conventional model validation procedure remains impractical due to the absence of counterfactual outcomes in observational data. Existing approaches for CATE estimator selection, such as plug-in and pseudo-outcome metrics, face two challenges. First, they must determine the metric form and the underlying machine learning models for fitting nuisance parameters (e.g., outcome function, propensity function, and plug-in learner). Second, they lack a specific focus on selecting a robust CATE estimator. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a Distributionally Robust Metric (DRM) for CATE estimator selection. The proposed DRM is nuisance-free, eliminating the need to fit models for nuisance parameters, and it effectively prioritizes the selection of a distributionally robust CATE estimator. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the DRM method in selecting CATE estimators that are robust to the distribution shift incurred by covariate shift and hidden confounders.

Related papers

• Causal Q-Aggregation for CATE Model Selection [24.094860486378167]
  We propose a new CATE ensembling approach based on Qaggregation using the doubly robust loss. Our main result shows that causal Q-aggregation achieves statistically optimal model selection regret rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T19:27:05Z)
• Cal-SFDA: Source-Free Domain-adaptive Semantic Segmentation with Differentiable Expected Calibration Error [50.86671887712424]
  The prevalence of domain adaptive semantic segmentation has prompted concerns regarding source domain data leakage. To circumvent the requirement for source data, source-free domain adaptation has emerged as a viable solution. We propose a novel calibration-guided source-free domain adaptive semantic segmentation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T03:28:34Z)
• Hyperparameter Tuning and Model Evaluation in Causal Effect Estimation [2.7823528791601686]
  This paper investigates the interplay between the four different aspects of model evaluation for causal effect estimation. We find that most causal estimators are roughly equivalent in performance if tuned thoroughly enough. We call for more research into causal model evaluation to unlock the optimum performance not currently being delivered even by state-of-the-art procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:03:02Z)
• Out-of-sample scoring and automatic selection of causal estimators [0.0]
  We propose novel scoring approaches for both the CATE case and an important subset of instrumental variable problems. We implement that in an open source package that relies on DoWhy and EconML libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T08:29:18Z)
• Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
  In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle. While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples. This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimation [24.65301562548798]
  We study the problem of model selection in causal inference, specifically for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. We conduct an empirical analysis to benchmark the surrogate model selection metrics introduced in the literature, as well as the novel ones introduced in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T16:26:06Z)
• Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
  We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework. AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z)
• Error-based Knockoffs Inference for Controlled Feature Selection [49.99321384855201]
  We propose an error-based knockoff inference method by integrating the knockoff features, the error-based feature importance statistics, and the stepdown procedure together. The proposed inference procedure does not require specifying a regression model and can handle feature selection with theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T01:55:59Z)
• On the estimation of discrete choice models to capture irrational customer behaviors [4.683806391173103]
  We show how to use partially-ranked preferences to efficiently model rational and irrational customer types from transaction data. An extensive set of experiments assesses the predictive accuracy of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-08T19:19:51Z)
• Selecting Treatment Effects Models for Domain Adaptation Using Causal Knowledge [82.5462771088607]
  We propose a novel model selection metric specifically designed for ITE methods under the unsupervised domain adaptation setting. In particular, we propose selecting models whose predictions of interventions' effects satisfy known causal structures in the target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T21:03:14Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.