Differentiating Student Feedbacks for Knowledge Tracing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14695v1
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:55:07 GMT
- Title: Differentiating Student Feedbacks for Knowledge Tracing
- Authors: Jiajun Cui, Wei Zhang
- Abstract summary: We propose DR4KT for Knowledge Tracing, which reweights the contribution of different responses according to their discrimination in training.
For retaining high prediction accuracy on low discriminative responses after reweighting, DR4KT also introduces a discrimination-aware score fusion technique.
- Score: 5.176190855174938
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In computer-aided education and intelligent tutoring systems, knowledge
tracing (KT) raises attention due to the development of data-driven learning
methods, which aims to predict students' future performance given their past
question response sequences to trace their knowledge states. However, current
deep learning approaches only focus on enhancing prediction accuracy, but
neglecting the discrimination imbalance of responses. That is, a considerable
proportion of question responses are weak to discriminate students' knowledge
states, but equally considered compared to other discriminative responses, thus
hurting the ability of tracing students' personalized knowledge states. To
tackle this issue, we propose DR4KT for Knowledge Tracing, which reweights the
contribution of different responses according to their discrimination in
training. For retaining high prediction accuracy on low discriminative
responses after reweighting, DR4KT also introduces a discrimination-aware score
fusion technique to make a proper combination between student knowledge mastery
and the questions themselves. Comprehensive experimental results show that our
DR4KT applied on four mainstream KT methods significantly improves their
performance on three widely-used datasets.
Related papers
- AdvKT: An Adversarial Multi-Step Training Framework for Knowledge Tracing [64.79967583649407]
Knowledge Tracing (KT) monitors students' knowledge states and simulates their responses to question sequences.
Existing KT models typically follow a single-step training paradigm, which leads to significant error accumulation.
We propose a novel Adversarial Multi-Step Training Framework for Knowledge Tracing (AdvKT) which focuses on the multi-step KT task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T03:31:57Z) - Improving Question Embeddings with Cognitiv Representation Optimization for Knowledge Tracing [77.14348157016518]
The Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to track changes in students' knowledge status and predict their future answers based on their historical answer records.
Current research on KT modeling focuses on predicting student' future performance based on existing, unupdated records of student learning interactions.
We propose a Cognitive Representation Optimization for Knowledge Tracing model, which utilizes a dynamic programming algorithm to optimize structure of cognitive representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-05T09:32:03Z) - Disentangled Knowledge Tracing for Alleviating Cognitive Bias [7.145106976584109]
We propose a Disentangled Knowledge Tracing model, which models students' familiar and unfamiliar abilities based on causal effects.
DisKT significantly alleviates cognitive bias and outperforms 16 baselines in evaluation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T12:04:13Z) - DASKT: A Dynamic Affect Simulation Method for Knowledge Tracing [51.665582274736785]
Knowledge Tracing (KT) predicts future performance by students' historical computation, and understanding students' affective states can enhance the effectiveness of KT.
We propose Affect Dynamic Knowledge Tracing (DASKT) to explore the impact of various student affective states on their knowledge states.
Our research highlights a promising avenue for future studies, focusing on achieving high interpretability and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-18T10:02:10Z) - Exploring Knowledge Boundaries in Large Language Models for Retrieval Judgment [56.87031484108484]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly recognized for their practical applications.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tackles this challenge and has shown a significant impact on LLMs.
By minimizing retrieval requests that yield neutral or harmful results, we can effectively reduce both time and computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-09T15:12:28Z) - Personalized Knowledge Tracing through Student Representation Reconstruction and Class Imbalance Mitigation [32.52262417461651]
Knowledge tracing is a technique that predicts students' future performance by analyzing their learning process.
Recent studies have achieved significant progress by leveraging powerful deep neural networks.
We propose PKT, a novel approach for personalized knowledge tracing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T07:02:46Z) - CURE4Rec: A Benchmark for Recommendation Unlearning with Deeper Influence [55.21518669075263]
CURE4Rec is the first comprehensive benchmark for recommendation unlearning evaluation.
We consider the deeper influence of unlearning on recommendation fairness and robustness towards data with varying impact levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-26T16:21:50Z) - Enhancing Knowledge Tracing with Concept Map and Response Disentanglement [5.201585012263761]
We propose the Concept map-driven Response disentanglement method for enhancing Knowledge Tracing (CRKT) model.
CRKT benefits KT by directly leveraging answer choices--beyond merely identifying correct or incorrect answers--to distinguish responses with different incorrect choices.
We further introduce the novel use of unchosen responses by employing disentangled representations to get insights from options not selected by students.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T11:25:56Z) - Explainable Few-shot Knowledge Tracing [48.877979333221326]
We propose a cognition-guided framework that can track the student knowledge from a few student records while providing natural language explanations.
Experimental results from three widely used datasets show that LLMs can perform comparable or superior to competitive deep knowledge tracing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T10:07:21Z) - Interpretable Knowledge Tracing via Response Influence-based Counterfactual Reasoning [10.80973695116047]
Knowledge tracing plays a crucial role in computer-aided education and intelligent tutoring systems.
Current approaches have explored psychological influences to achieve more explainable predictions.
We propose RCKT, a novel response influence-based counterfactual knowledge tracing framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T11:27:08Z) - Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep
Learning [61.94125052118442]
Uncertainty estimation is a key factor that makes deep learning reliable in practical applications.
We propose a novel method, Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learning ($mathcalI$-EDL)
In particular, we introduce Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) to measure the informativeness of evidence carried by each sample, according to which we can dynamically reweight the objective loss terms to make the network more focused on the representation learning of uncertain classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T16:12:59Z) - Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognition with Adaptive Teacher
Learning and Fine-grained Student Ensemble [56.705249154629264]
Self-training teacher-student frameworks are proposed to improve the robustness of NER models.
In this paper, we propose an adaptive teacher learning comprised of two teacher-student networks.
Fine-grained student ensemble updates each fragment of the teacher model with a temporal moving average of the corresponding fragment of the student, which enhances consistent predictions on each model fragment against noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T12:14:09Z) - A Unified End-to-End Retriever-Reader Framework for Knowledge-based VQA [67.75989848202343]
This paper presents a unified end-to-end retriever-reader framework towards knowledge-based VQA.
We shed light on the multi-modal implicit knowledge from vision-language pre-training models to mine its potential in knowledge reasoning.
Our scheme is able to not only provide guidance for knowledge retrieval, but also drop these instances potentially error-prone towards question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T02:35:04Z) - Interpretable Knowledge Tracing: Simple and Efficient Student Modeling
with Causal Relations [21.74631969428855]
Interpretable Knowledge Tracing (IKT) is a simple model that relies on three meaningful latent features.
IKT's prediction of future student performance is made using a Tree-Augmented Naive Bayes (TAN)
IKT has great potential for providing adaptive and personalized instructions with causal reasoning in real-world educational systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T19:05:48Z) - Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on
Active Learning for Visual Question Answering [71.15403434929915]
We show that across 5 models and 4 datasets on the task of visual question answering, a wide variety of active learning approaches fail to outperform random selection.
We identify the problem as collective outliers -- groups of examples that active learning methods prefer to acquire but models fail to learn.
We show that active learning sample efficiency increases significantly as the number of collective outliers in the active learning pool decreases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-06T00:52:11Z) - Option Tracing: Beyond Correctness Analysis in Knowledge Tracing [3.1798318618973362]
We extend existing knowledge tracing methods to predict the exact option students select in multiple choice questions.
We quantitatively evaluate the performance of our option tracing methods on two large-scale student response datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-19T04:28:34Z) - Fairness in Semi-supervised Learning: Unlabeled Data Help to Reduce
Discrimination [53.3082498402884]
A growing specter in the rise of machine learning is whether the decisions made by machine learning models are fair.
We present a framework of fair semi-supervised learning in the pre-processing phase, including pseudo labeling to predict labels for unlabeled data.
A theoretical decomposition analysis of bias, variance and noise highlights the different sources of discrimination and the impact they have on fairness in semi-supervised learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-25T05:48:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.