Backdoor Attacks Against Dataset Distillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01197v1
• Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 16:58:34 GMT
• Title: Backdoor Attacks Against Dataset Distillation
• Authors: Yugeng Liu, Zheng Li, Michael Backes, Yun Shen, Yang Zhang
• Abstract summary: This study performs the first backdoor attack against the models trained on the data distilled by dataset distillation models in the image domain. We propose two types of backdoor attacks, namely NAIVEATTACK and DOORPING. Empirical evaluation shows that NAIVEATTACK achieves decent attack success rate (ASR) scores in some cases, while DOORPING reaches higher ASR scores (close to 1.0) in all cases.
• Score: 24.39067295054253
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Dataset distillation has emerged as a prominent technique to improve data efficiency when training machine learning models. It encapsulates the knowledge from a large dataset into a smaller synthetic dataset. A model trained on this smaller distilled dataset can attain comparable performance to a model trained on the original training dataset. However, the existing dataset distillation techniques mainly aim at achieving the best trade-off between resource usage efficiency and model utility. The security risks stemming from them have not been explored. This study performs the first backdoor attack against the models trained on the data distilled by dataset distillation models in the image domain. Concretely, we inject triggers into the synthetic data during the distillation procedure rather than during the model training stage, where all previous attacks are performed. We propose two types of backdoor attacks, namely NAIVEATTACK and DOORPING. NAIVEATTACK simply adds triggers to the raw data at the initial distillation phase, while DOORPING iteratively updates the triggers during the entire distillation procedure. We conduct extensive evaluations on multiple datasets, architectures, and dataset distillation techniques. Empirical evaluation shows that NAIVEATTACK achieves decent attack success rate (ASR) scores in some cases, while DOORPING reaches higher ASR scores (close to 1.0) in all cases. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive ablation study to analyze the factors that may affect the attack performance. Finally, we evaluate multiple defense mechanisms against our backdoor attacks and show that our attacks can practically circumvent these defense mechanisms.

Related papers

• Long-Tailed Backdoor Attack Using Dynamic Data Augmentation Operations [50.1394620328318]
  Existing backdoor attacks mainly focus on balanced datasets. We propose an effective backdoor attack named Dynamic Data Augmentation Operation (D$2$AO) Our method can achieve the state-of-the-art attack performance while preserving the clean accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T18:44:22Z)
• PAD-FT: A Lightweight Defense for Backdoor Attacks via Data Purification and Fine-Tuning [4.337364406035291]
  Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to deep neural networks. We propose a novel mechanism, PAD-FT, that does not require an additional clean dataset and fine-tunes only a very small part of the model to disinfect the victim model. Our mechanism demonstrates superior effectiveness across multiple backdoor attack methods and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T15:47:23Z)
• Exploring the potential of prototype-based soft-labels data distillation for imbalanced data classification [0.0]
  Main goal is to push further the performance of prototype-based soft-labels distillation in terms of classification accuracy. Experimental studies trace the capability of the method to distill the data, but also the opportunity to act as an augmentation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:15:19Z)
• Retrosynthesis prediction enhanced by in-silico reaction data augmentation [66.5643280109899]
  We present RetroWISE, a framework that employs a base model inferred from real paired data to perform in-silico reaction generation and augmentation. On three benchmark datasets, RetroWISE achieves the best overall performance against state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T07:40:37Z)
• Importance-Aware Adaptive Dataset Distillation [53.79746115426363]
  Development of deep learning models is enabled by the availability of large-scale datasets. dataset distillation aims to synthesize a compact dataset that retains the essential information from the large original dataset. We propose an importance-aware adaptive dataset distillation (IADD) method that can improve distillation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T03:29:39Z)
• Rethinking Backdoor Attacks on Dataset Distillation: A Kernel Method Perspective [65.70799289211868]
  We introduce two new theory-driven trigger pattern generation methods specialized for dataset distillation. We show that our optimization-based trigger design framework informs effective backdoor attacks on dataset distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T09:53:05Z)
• Distill Gold from Massive Ores: Bi-level Data Pruning towards Efficient Dataset Distillation [96.92250565207017]
  We study the data efficiency and selection for the dataset distillation task. By re-formulating the dynamics of distillation, we provide insight into the inherent redundancy in the real dataset. We find the most contributing samples based on their causal effects on the distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T06:53:41Z)
• A Comprehensive Study on Dataset Distillation: Performance, Privacy, Robustness and Fairness [8.432686179800543]
  We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate current state-of-the-art dataset distillation methods. We successfully use membership inference attacks to show that privacy risks still remain. This work offers a large-scale benchmarking framework for dataset distillation evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T08:19:27Z)
• INK: Inheritable Natural Backdoor Attack Against Model Distillation [8.937026844871074]
  We introduce INK, an inheritable natural backdoor attack that targets model distillation. INK employs image variance as a backdoor trigger and enables both clean-image and clean-label attacks. For instance, INK maintains an attack success rate of over 98% post-distillation, compared to an average success rate of 1.4% for existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T14:35:47Z)
• Contrastive Model Inversion for Data-Free Knowledge Distillation [60.08025054715192]
  We propose Contrastive Model Inversion, where the data diversity is explicitly modeled as an optimizable objective. Our main observation is that, under the constraint of the same amount of data, higher data diversity usually indicates stronger instance discrimination. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet demonstrate that CMI achieves significantly superior performance when the generated data are used for knowledge distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T15:13:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.