Uncertainty Estimation based on Geometric Separation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04452v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:19:24 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Estimation based on Geometric Separation
• Authors: Gabriella Chouraqui and Liron Cohen and Gil Einziger and Liel Leman
• Abstract summary: In machine learning, accurately predicting the probability that a specific input is correct is crucial for risk management. We put forward a novel geometric-based approach for improving uncertainty estimations in machine learning models.
• Score: 13.588210692213568
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In machine learning, accurately predicting the probability that a specific input is correct is crucial for risk management. This process, known as uncertainty (or confidence) estimation, is particularly important in mission-critical applications such as autonomous driving. In this work, we put forward a novel geometric-based approach for improving uncertainty estimations in machine learning models. Our approach involves using the geometric distance of the current input from existing training inputs as a signal for estimating uncertainty, and then calibrating this signal using standard post-hoc techniques. We demonstrate that our method leads to more accurate uncertainty estimations than recently proposed approaches through extensive evaluation on a variety of datasets and models. Additionally, we optimize our approach so that it can be implemented on large datasets in near real-time applications, making it suitable for time-sensitive scenarios.

Related papers

• Probabilistic Parameter Estimators and Calibration Metrics for Pose Estimation from Image Features [30.85393323542915]
  This paper addresses the challenge of probabilistic parameter estimation given measurement uncertainty in real-time. We present three probabilistic parameter estimators: a least-squares sampling approach, a linear approximation method, and a probabilistic programming estimator. We demonstrate that the linear approximation estimator can produce sharp and well-calibrated pose predictions significantly faster than the other methods but may yield overconfident predictions in certain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T07:02:01Z)
• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation for Safety-critical Scene Segmentation via Fine-grained Reward Maximization [12.79542334840646]
  Uncertainty estimation plays an important role for future reliable deployment of deep segmentation models in safety-critical scenarios. We propose a novel fine-grained reward (FGRM) framework to address uncertainty estimation. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a clear margin on all the calibration metrics of uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T17:43:37Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• Distribution-free risk assessment of regression-based machine learning algorithms [6.507711025292814]
  We focus on regression algorithms and the risk-assessment task of computing the probability of the true label lying inside an interval defined around the model's prediction. We solve the risk-assessment problem using the conformal prediction approach, which provides prediction intervals that are guaranteed to contain the true label with a given probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T13:57:24Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Lightweight, Uncertainty-Aware Conformalized Visual Odometry [2.429910016019183]
  Data-driven visual odometry (VO) is a critical subroutine for autonomous edge robotics. Emerging edge robotics devices like insect-scale drones and surgical robots lack a computationally efficient framework to estimate VO's predictive uncertainties. This paper presents a novel, lightweight, and statistically robust framework that leverages conformal inference (CI) to extract VO's uncertainty bands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T20:37:55Z)
• A Geometric Method for Improved Uncertainty Estimation in Real-time [13.588210692213568]
  Post-hoc model calibrations can improve models' uncertainty estimations without the need for retraining. Our work puts forward a geometric-based approach for uncertainty estimation. We show that our method yields better uncertainty estimations than recently proposed approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T09:18:05Z)
• Learning Uncertainty For Safety-Oriented Semantic Segmentation In Autonomous Driving [77.39239190539871]
  We show how uncertainty estimation can be leveraged to enable safety critical image segmentation in autonomous driving. We introduce a new uncertainty measure based on disagreeing predictions as measured by a dissimilarity function. We show experimentally that our proposed approach is much less computationally intensive at inference time than competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T09:23:05Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecasting [67.77102283276409]
  We describe two types of forecasting problems: regular grid-based and graph-based. We analyze UQ methods from both the Bayesian and the frequentist point view, casting in a unified framework via statistical decision theory. Through extensive experiments on real-world road network traffic, epidemics, and air quality forecasting tasks, we reveal the statistical computational trade-offs for different UQ methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T14:35:46Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.