A system for Human-AI collaboration for Online Customer Support

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12158v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:07:23 GMT
• Title: A system for Human-AI collaboration for Online Customer Support
• Authors: Debayan Banerjee, Mathis Poser, Christina Wiethof, Varun Shankar Subramanian, Richard Paucar, Eva A. C. Bittner, Chris Biemann
• Abstract summary: We present a system where a human support agent collaborates in real-time with an AI agent to satisfactorily answer customer queries. We describe the user interaction elements of the solution, along with the machine learning techniques involved in the AI agent.
• Score: 16.22226476879187
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI enabled chat bots have recently been put to use to answer customer service queries, however it is a common feedback of users that bots lack a personal touch and are often unable to understand the real intent of the user's question. To this end, it is desirable to have human involvement in the customer servicing process. In this work, we present a system where a human support agent collaborates in real-time with an AI agent to satisfactorily answer customer queries. We describe the user interaction elements of the solution, along with the machine learning techniques involved in the AI agent.

Related papers

• Explaining Explaining [0.882727051273924]
  Explanation is key to people having confidence in high-stakes AI systems. Machine-learning-based systems can't explain because they are usually black boxes. We describe a hybrid approach to developing cognitive agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T16:55:44Z)
• "Ask Me Anything": How Comcast Uses LLMs to Assist Agents in Real Time [9.497432249460385]
  We introduce "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) as an add-on feature to an agent-facing customer service interface. AMA allows agents to ask questions to a large language model (LLM) on demand, as they are handling customer conversations. We find that agents using AMA versus a traditional search experience spend approximately 10% fewer seconds per conversation containing a search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T18:31:36Z)
• The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
  This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user. We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z)
• Beyond Static Evaluation: A Dynamic Approach to Assessing AI Assistants' API Invocation Capabilities [48.922660354417204]
  We propose Automated Dynamic Evaluation (AutoDE) to assess an assistant's API call capability without human involvement. In our framework, we endeavor to closely mirror genuine human conversation patterns in human-machine interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T07:34:12Z)
• Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback [42.19685958922537]
  We argue that human-AI collaboration should be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T05:37:59Z)
• Intent Recognition in Conversational Recommender Systems [0.0]
  We introduce a pipeline to contextualize the input utterances in conversations. We then take the next step towards leveraging reverse feature engineering to link the contextualized input and learning model to support intent recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T11:02:42Z)
• What Do End-Users Really Want? Investigation of Human-Centered XAI for Mobile Health Apps [69.53730499849023]
  We present a user-centered persona concept to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) Results show that users' demographics and personality, as well as the type of explanation, impact explanation preferences. Our insights bring an interactive, human-centered XAI closer to practical application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T12:51:27Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Evaluating Empathetic Chatbots in Customer Service Settings [6.523873187705393]
  We show that a blended skills chatbots model that responds to customer queries is more likely to resemble actual human agent response if it is trained to recognize emotion and exhibit appropriate empathy. For our analysis, we leverage a Twitter customer service dataset containing several million customer->agent dialog examples in customer service contexts from 20 well-known brands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-05T03:34:35Z)
• Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration [116.28433607265573]
  We introduce Watch-And-Help (WAH), a challenge for testing social intelligence in AI agents. In WAH, an AI agent needs to help a human-like agent perform a complex household task efficiently. We build VirtualHome-Social, a multi-agent household environment, and provide a benchmark including both planning and learning based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:48:31Z)
• Joint Mind Modeling for Explanation Generation in Complex Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks [83.37025218216888]
  We propose a novel explainable AI (XAI) framework for achieving human-like communication in human-robot collaborations. The robot builds a hierarchical mind model of the human user and generates explanations of its own mind as a form of communications. Results show that the generated explanations of our approach significantly improves the collaboration performance and user perception of the robot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T23:35:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.