Reducing Blackwell and Average Optimality to Discounted MDPs via the Blackwell Discount Factor

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00036v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 19:11:17 GMT
• Title: Reducing Blackwell and Average Optimality to Discounted MDPs via the Blackwell Discount Factor
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Blackwell discount factor for Decision Processes (MDPs) We show that when the discount factor is larger than the Blackwell discount factor $gamma_mathrmbw$, all discounted optimal policies become Blackwell- and average-optimal.
• Score: 13.544364903649196
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce the Blackwell discount factor for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Classical objectives for MDPs include discounted, average, and Blackwell optimality. Many existing approaches to computing average-optimal policies solve for discounted optimal policies with a discount factor close to $1$, but they only work under strong or hard-to-verify assumptions such as ergodicity or weakly communicating MDPs. In this paper, we show that when the discount factor is larger than the Blackwell discount factor $\gamma_{\mathrm{bw}}$, all discounted optimal policies become Blackwell- and average-optimal, and we derive a general upper bound on $\gamma_{\mathrm{bw}}$. The upper bound on $\gamma_{\mathrm{bw}}$ provides the first reduction from average and Blackwell optimality to discounted optimality, without any assumptions, and new polynomial-time algorithms for average- and Blackwell-optimal policies. Our work brings new ideas from the study of polynomials and algebraic numbers to the analysis of MDPs. Our results also apply to robust MDPs, enabling the first algorithms to compute robust Blackwell-optimal policies.

Related papers

• Provably Efficient Algorithms for S- and Non-Rectangular Robust MDPs with General Parameterization [85.91302339486673]
  We study robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs) with general policy parameterization under s-rectangular and non-rectangular uncertainty sets.<n>We prove novel Lipschitz and Lipschitz-smoothness properties for general policy parameterizations that extends to infinite state spaces.<n>We design a projected gradient descent algorithm for s-rectangular uncertainty and a Frank-Wolfe algorithm for non-rectangular uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T21:44:20Z)
• Efficient Computation of Blackwell Optimal Policies using Rational Functions [3.0529230554642752]
  Decision Problems (MDPs) provide a foundational framework for modelling sequential decision-making across diverse domains.<n> discounted optimality may overly prioritise short-term rewards, while average optimality relies on strong structural assumptions.<n>Blackwell optimality addresses these challenges, offering a robust and comprehensive criterion that ensures optimality under both discounted and average reward frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T17:41:30Z)
• Quantile-Optimal Policy Learning under Unmeasured Confounding [55.72891849926314]
  We study quantile-optimal policy learning where the goal is to find a policy whose reward distribution has the largest $alpha$-quantile for some $alpha in (0, 1)$.<n>Such a problem suffers from three main challenges: (i) nonlinearity of the quantile objective as a functional of the reward distribution, (ii) unobserved confounding issue, and (iii) insufficient coverage of the offline dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T13:37:38Z)
• Optimal Strong Regret and Violation in Constrained MDPs via Policy Optimization [37.24692425018]
  We study online learning in emphconstrained MDPs (CMDPs) Our algorithm implements a primal-dual scheme that employs a state-of-the-art policy optimization approach for adversarial MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T07:54:04Z)
• On the Global Convergence of Policy Gradient in Average Reward Markov Decision Processes [50.68789924454235]
  We present the first finite time global convergence analysis of policy gradient in the context of average reward Markov decision processes (MDPs) Our analysis shows that the policy gradient iterates converge to the optimal policy at a sublinear rate of $Oleft(frac1Tright),$ which translates to $Oleft(log(T)right)$ regret, where $T$ represents the number of iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T15:25:03Z)
• Span-Based Optimal Sample Complexity for Average Reward MDPs [6.996002801232415]
  We study the sample complexity of learning an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in an average-reward Markov decision process (MDP) under a generative model. We establish the complexity bound $widetildeOleft(SAfracH (1-gamma)2varepsilon2 right)$, where $H$ is the span of the bias function of the optimal policy and $SA$ is the cardinality of the state-action space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T15:34:44Z)
• Model-Free, Regret-Optimal Best Policy Identification in Online CMDPs [17.62509045102346]
  This paper considers the best policy identification problem in online Constrained Markov Decision Processes (CMDPs) We are interested in algorithms that are model-free, have low regret, and identify an approximately optimal policy with a high probability. Existing model-free algorithms for online CMDPs with sublinear regret and constraint violation do not provide any convergence guarantee to an optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T04:33:09Z)
• Robust Average-Reward Markov Decision Processes [25.125481838479256]
  We focus on robust average-reward MDPs, where the goal is to find a policy that optimize the worst-case average reward over an uncertainty set. We take an approach that approximates average-reward MDPs using discounted MDPs. We derive the robust Bellman equation for robust average-reward MDPs, prove that the optimal policy can be derived from its solution, and further design a robust relative value algorithm that provably finds its solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T19:51:55Z)
• Nearly Optimal Latent State Decoding in Block MDPs [74.51224067640717]
  In episodic Block MDPs, the decision maker has access to rich observations or contexts generated from a small number of latent states. We are first interested in estimating the latent state decoding function based on data generated under a fixed behavior policy. We then study the problem of learning near-optimal policies in the reward-free framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T18:49:53Z)
• Efficient Policy Iteration for Robust Markov Decision Processes via Regularization [49.05403412954533]
  Robust decision processes (MDPs) provide a framework to model decision problems where the system dynamics are changing or only partially known. Recent work established the equivalence between texttts rectangular $L_p$ robust MDPs and regularized MDPs, and derived a regularized policy iteration scheme that enjoys the same level of efficiency as standard MDPs. In this work, we focus on the policy improvement step and derive concrete forms for the greedy policy and the optimal robust Bellman operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T04:05:20Z)
• Understanding the Effect of Stochasticity in Policy Optimization [86.7574122154668]
  We show that the preferability of optimization methods depends critically on whether exact gradients are used. Second, to explain these findings we introduce the concept of committal rate for policy optimization. Third, we show that in the absence of external oracle information, there is an inherent trade-off between exploiting geometry to accelerate convergence versus achieving optimality almost surely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T06:35:44Z)
• Optimistic Policy Optimization is Provably Efficient in Non-stationary MDPs [113.8752163061151]
  We study episodic reinforcement learning (RL) in non-stationary linear kernel Markov decision processes (MDPs) We propose the underlineperiodically underlinerestarted underlineoptimistic underlinepolicy underlineoptimization algorithm (PROPO) PROPO features two mechanisms: sliding-window-based policy evaluation and periodic-restart-based policy improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T02:33:20Z)
• Joint Optimization of Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Policy Gradient Based Algorithm [50.50545326342971]
  We formulate the problem of maximizing a non-linear concave function of multiple long-term objectives.<n>A policy-gradient based model-free algorithm is proposed for the problem.<n>The proposed algorithm is shown to achieve convergence to within an $epsilon$ of the global optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T22:20:54Z)
• Softmax Policy Gradient Methods Can Take Exponential Time to Converge [60.98700344526674]
  The softmax policy gradient (PG) method is arguably one of the de facto implementations of policy optimization in modern reinforcement learning. We demonstrate that softmax PG methods can take exponential time -- in terms of $mathcalS|$ and $frac11-gamma$ -- to converge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T18:56:26Z)
• RL for Latent MDPs: Regret Guarantees and a Lower Bound [74.41782017817808]
  We consider the regret problem for reinforcement learning in latent Markov Decision Processes (LMDP) In an LMDP, an MDP is randomly drawn from a set of $M$ possible MDPs at the beginning of the interaction, but the identity of the chosen MDP is not revealed to the agent. We show that the key link is a notion of separation between the MDP system dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T16:49:58Z)
• Blackwell Online Learning for Markov Decision Processes [28.79413432611949]
  This work provides a novel interpretation of Markov Decision Processes (MDP) from the online optimization viewpoint. We construct a Blackwell game induced by MDP, which bridges the gap among regret minimization, Blackwell approachability theory, and learning theory for MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T00:40:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.