'Generative CI' through Collective Response Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00672v1
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:59:02 GMT
- Title: 'Generative CI' through Collective Response Systems
- Authors: Aviv Ovadya
- Abstract summary: "Collective response systems" are a type of generative collective intelligence (CI) facilitation process.
They enable a form of "generative voting", where both the votes, and the choices of what to vote on, are provided by the group.
This paper aims to develop a shared language by defining the structure, processes, properties, and principles of such systems.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: How can many people (who may disagree) come together to answer a question or
make a decision? "Collective response systems" are a type of generative
collective intelligence (CI) facilitation process meant to address this
challenge. They enable a form of "generative voting", where both the votes, and
the choices of what to vote on, are provided by the group. Such systems
overcome the traditional limitations of polling, town halls, standard voting,
referendums, etc. The generative CI outputs of collective response systems can
also be chained together into iterative "collective dialogues", analogously to
some kinds of generative AI.
Technical advances across domains including recommender systems, language
models, and human-computer interaction have led to the development of
innovative and scalable collective response systems. For example, Polis has
been used around the world to support policy-making at different levels of
government, and Remesh has been used by the UN to understand the challenges and
needs of ordinary people across war-torn countries. This paper aims to develop
a shared language by defining the structure, processes, properties, and
principles of such systems.
Collective response systems allow non-confrontational exploration of divisive
issues, help identify common ground, and elicit insights from those closest to
the issues. As a result, they can help overcome gridlock around conflict and
governance challenges, increase trust, and develop mandates. Continued progress
toward their development and adoption could help revitalize democracies,
reimagine corporate governance, transform conflict, and govern powerful AI
systems -- both as a complement to deeper deliberative democratic processes and
as an option where deeper processes are not applicable or possible.
Related papers
- From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation.
We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z) - Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Language Model Agents [0.0]
Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems.
I pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive.
I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Language Model Agents'
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T05:34:07Z) - SADAS: A Dialogue Assistant System Towards Remediating Norm Violations
in Bilingual Socio-Cultural Conversations [56.31816995795216]
Socially-Aware Dialogue Assistant System (SADAS) is designed to ensure that conversations unfold with respect and understanding.
Our system's novel architecture includes: (1) identifying the categories of norms present in the dialogue, (2) detecting potential norm violations, (3) evaluating the severity of these violations, and (4) implementing targeted remedies to rectify the breaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T08:54:21Z) - PICK: Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring for Knowledge-Grounded
Dialogue Systems [59.1250765143521]
Current knowledge-grounded dialogue systems often fail to align the generated responses with human-preferred qualities.
We propose Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring (PICK), a generation re-scoring framework.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of PICK in generating responses that are more faithful while keeping them relevant to the dialogue history.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-19T08:27:09Z) - Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey [58.30439850203101]
Information retrieval has evolved from term-based methods to its integration with advanced neural models.
Recent research has sought to leverage large language models (LLMs) to improve IR systems.
We delve into the confluence of LLMs and IR systems, including crucial aspects such as query rewriters, retrievers, rerankers, and readers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T12:47:22Z) - Generative AI trial for nonviolent communication mediation [0.0]
ChatGPT was used in place of the traditional certified trainer to test the possibility of mediating input sentences.
Results indicate that there is potential for the application of generative AI, although not yet at a practical level.
It is hoped that the widespread use of NVC mediation using generative AI will lead to the early realization of a mixbiotic society.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T06:19:29Z) - A Liquid Democracy System for Human-Computer Societies [0.0]
We present design and implementation of a reputation system supporting "liquid democracy" principle.
The system is based on "weighted liquid rank" algorithm employing different sorts of explicit and implicit ratings being exchanged by members of the society.
The system is evaluated against live social network data with help of simulation modelling for an online marketplace case.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-05T15:57:49Z) - Multi-AI Complex Systems in Humanitarian Response [0.0]
We describe how multi-AI systems can arise, even in relatively simple real-world humanitarian response scenarios, and lead to potentially emergent and erratic erroneous behavior.
This paper is designed to be a first exposition on this topic in the field of humanitarian response, raising awareness, exploring the possible landscape of this domain, and providing a starting point for future work within the wider community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-24T03:01:21Z) - Multiscale Governance [0.0]
Humandemics will propagate because of the pathways that connect the different systems.
The emerging fragility or robustness of the system will depend on how this complex network of systems is governed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-06T19:23:44Z) - Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research
Challenges [80.39805582015133]
We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI)
Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently.
We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.