Related papers: Emergent Causality and the Foundation of Consciousness

Emergent Causality and the Foundation of Consciousness

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03189v4
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:51:47 GMT
Title: Emergent Causality and the Foundation of Consciousness
Authors: Michael Timothy Bennett,
Abstract summary: We argue that in the absence of a $do$ operator, an intervention can be represented by a variable. In a narrow sense this describes what it is to be aware, and is a mechanistic explanation of aspects of consciousness.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abstract: To make accurate inferences in an interactive setting, an agent must not confuse passive observation of events with having intervened to cause them. The $do$ operator formalises interventions so that we may reason about their effect. Yet there exist pareto optimal mathematical formalisms of general intelligence in an interactive setting which, presupposing no explicit representation of intervention, make maximally accurate inferences. We examine one such formalism. We show that in the absence of a $do$ operator, an intervention can be represented by a variable. We then argue that variables are abstractions, and that need to explicitly represent interventions in advance arises only because we presuppose these sorts of abstractions. The aforementioned formalism avoids this and so, initial conditions permitting, representations of relevant causal interventions will emerge through induction. These emergent abstractions function as representations of one`s self and of any other object, inasmuch as the interventions of those objects impact the satisfaction of goals. We argue that this explains how one might reason about one`s own identity and intent, those of others, of one`s own as perceived by others and so on. In a narrow sense this describes what it is to be aware, and is a mechanistic explanation of aspects of consciousness.

Related papers

Counterfactual Generation from Language Models [64.55296662926919]
We show that counterfactual reasoning is conceptually distinct from interventions. We propose a framework for generating true string counterfactuals. Our experiments demonstrate that the approach produces meaningful counterfactuals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T17:57:30Z)
Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patching [47.05588106164043]
Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand model behaviors in terms of specific, interpretable features. Recent studies have explored subspace interventions as a way to manipulate model behavior and attribute the features behind it to given subspaces. We demonstrate that these two aims diverge, potentially leading to an illusory sense of interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T18:32:19Z)
A general mechanism of humor: reformulating the semantic overlap [0.0]
This article proposes a cognitive mechanism of humour of general applicability, not restricted to verbal communication. By substituting "stimuli" of any kind for "utterances" in this model, we obtain a mechanism as easily applicable to non-verbal communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T18:36:13Z)
Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
Phenomenological Causality [14.817342045377842]
We propose a notion of 'phenomenological causality' whose basic concept is a set of elementary actions. We argue that it is consistent with the causal Markov condition when the system under consideration interacts with other variables that control the elementary actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T13:05:45Z)
Towards a Grounded Theory of Causation for Embodied AI [12.259552039796027]
Existing frameworks give no indication as to which behaviour policies or physical transformations of state space shall count as interventions. The framework sketched in this paper describes actions as transformations of state space, for instance induced by an agent running a policy. This makes it possible to describe in a uniform way both transformations of the micro-state space and abstract models thereof.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-28T12:56:43Z)
Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities [80.37857025201036]
Key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-27T22:15:56Z)
Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate Experiments [95.48089725859298]
We study the identification of nested counterfactuals from an arbitrary combination of observations and experiments. Specifically, we prove the counterfactual unnesting theorem (CUT), which allows one to map arbitrary nested counterfactuals to unnested ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T12:51:04Z)
Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Execution [97.50813120600026]
Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.