A general mechanism of humor: reformulating the semantic overlap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07803v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:36:13 GMT
• Title: A general mechanism of humor: reformulating the semantic overlap
• Abstract summary: This article proposes a cognitive mechanism of humour of general applicability, not restricted to verbal communication. By substituting "stimuli" of any kind for "utterances" in this model, we obtain a mechanism as easily applicable to non-verbal communication.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This article proposes a cognitive mechanism of humour of general applicability, not restricted to verbal communication. It is indebted to Raskin's concept of script overlap, and conforms to the incongruity-resolution theoretical framework, but it is built on the notion of constraint, an abstract correspondence between sets of data. Under this view, script overlap is an outcome of a more abstractly described phenomenon, constraint overlap. The important concept of the overlooked argument is introduced to characterise the two overlapping constraints -- overt and covert. Their inputs and outputs are not directly encoded in utterances, but implicated by them, and their overlap results in another overlap at the level of the communicated utterances, that the incongruity reveals. Our hypothesis assumes as a given that the evocation of such constraints is a cognitive effect of the inferential process by which a hearer interprets utterances. We base this assumption on Hofstadter's theory of analogy-making as the essence of human thought. By substituting "stimuli" of any kind for "utterances" in this model, we obtain a mechanism as easily applicable to non-verbal communication -- slapstick, cartoons -- and we propose it describes the necessary and sufficient conditions for a communicative act in any modality to carry humour.

Related papers

• A Formal Limitation on Learning Human Language From Textual Corpora [54.22186267212778]
  We derive upper bounds on the probability that a decoder recovers a speaker's intended meaning from a representation of the utterance.<n>Experiments on artificial languages, Mandarin zero-pronoun resolution, and color reference provide empirical evidence in support of the theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T17:38:24Z)
• Asymmetric Communication: Large Language Models and Language Games [0.0]
  Human-LLM interaction constitutes a language game in which one side bears all normative activity.<n>This paper argues that these are instances of a single category mistake--properties constituted within human communicative practice are projected onto the machine side--and explains its structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T12:45:50Z)
• Interpretation, Learning, and Empathy as One Constraint: A Residual-Adequacy Architecture with Accountable Abstention [0.0]
  We develop a small cognitive architecture in which limits arise from a single quantity.<n>An Interpretation-Decision Unit (IDU) interprets a content vector through a family of regimes and decides which actions it licenses.<n>We prove the unit is total and deterministic: for any content and fixed configuration it halts in finitely many bounded-cost steps with a unique terminal witness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T10:57:28Z)
• When Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Following [51.2195840589474]
  We introduce Build What I Mean, an interactive benchmark for contextual meaning construction.<n>In BWIM, models must resolve ambiguity by either performing a contextual inference or requesting clarification at a small communication cost.<n>We observe suboptimal strategies, such as partner-blind over-clarification and question-averse guessing under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T14:46:59Z)
• The Silent Thought: Modeling Internal Cognition in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models via Latent Reasoning [76.96796481909581]
  Internal cognitive processing is instrumental in formulating high-quality responses.<n>We propose a novel method named FLAIR that conducts latent thinking simultaneously with speech perception.<n>Our approach aligns seamlessly with spoken dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T15:30:29Z)
• Pragmatics beyond humans: meaning, communication, and LLMs [0.0]
  The paper reconceptualizes pragmatics as a dynamic interface through which language operates as a tool for action.<n>The paper argues that this understanding needs to be further refined and methodologically reconsidered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T09:34:41Z)
• Regularized Conventions: Equilibrium Computation as a Model of Pragmatic Reasoning [72.21876989058858]
  We present a model of pragmatic language understanding, where utterances are produced and understood by searching for regularized equilibria of signaling games. In this model speakers and listeners search for contextually appropriate utterance--meaning mappings that are both close to game-theoretically optimal conventions and close to a shared, ''default'' semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T09:42:36Z)
• Emergent Causality and the Foundation of Consciousness [0.0]
  We argue that in the absence of a $do$ operator, an intervention can be represented by a variable. In a narrow sense this describes what it is to be aware, and is a mechanistic explanation of aspects of consciousness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T01:41:23Z)
• A contextually objective approach to the extended Wigner's friend thought experiment [0.0]
  We show that no contradiction arises if one admits that agents must agree on what is considered as a system and what is not. In such a contextually objective approach of quantum mechanics, the apparent contradiction is automatically removed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T10:58:02Z)
• Unifying different notions of quantum incompatibility into a strict hierarchy of resource theories of communication [60.18814584837969]
  We introduce the notion of q-compatibility, which unifies different notions of POVMs, channels, and instruments incompatibility. We are able to pinpoint exactly what each notion of incompatibility consists of, in terms of information-theoretic resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T21:33:31Z)
• Differential Geometry of Contextuality [0.0]
  Contextuality has long been associated with topological properties. We employ the usual identification of states, effects, and transformations as vectors in a vector space and encode them into a tangent space. We discuss how the two views for encoding contextuality relate to interpretations of quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T15:49:38Z)
• NOPE: A Corpus of Naturally-Occurring Presuppositions in English [33.69537711677911]
  We introduce the Naturally-Occurring Presuppositions in English (NOPE) Corpus. We investigate the context-sensitivity of 10 different types of presupposition triggers. We evaluate machine learning models' ability to predict human inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T22:03:23Z)
• A recipe for annotating grounded clarifications [0.0]
  We argue that dialogue clarification mechanisms make explicit the process of interpreting the communicative intents of the speaker's utterances. This paper frames dialogue clarification mechanisms as an understudied research problem and a key missing piece in the giant jigsaw puzzle of natural language understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T21:47:48Z)
• Did they answer? Subjective acts and intents in conversational discourse [48.63528550837949]
  We present the first discourse dataset with multiple and subjective interpretations of English conversation. We show disagreements are nuanced and require a deeper understanding of the different contextual factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T16:34:19Z)
• Lexically-constrained Text Generation through Commonsense Knowledge Extraction and Injection [62.071938098215085]
  We focus on the Commongen benchmark, wherein the aim is to generate a plausible sentence for a given set of input concepts. We propose strategies for enhancing the semantic correctness of the generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T23:23:40Z)
• Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attribution [58.13152510843004]
  We find that the requirement of model interpretations to be faithful is vague and incomplete. We identify that the problem is a misalignment between the causal chain of decisions (causal attribution) and the attribution of human behavior to the interpretation (social attribution)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T16:45:38Z)
• Emergence of Pragmatics from Referential Game between Theory of Mind Agents [64.25696237463397]
  We propose an algorithm, using which agents can spontaneously learn the ability to "read between lines" without any explicit hand-designed rules. We integrate the theory of mind (ToM) in a cooperative multi-agent pedagogical situation and propose an adaptive reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to develop a communication protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T19:37:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.