An Expert System to Diagnose Spinal Disorders
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03625v1
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 17:28:24 GMT
- Title: An Expert System to Diagnose Spinal Disorders
- Abstract summary: Traditional invasive approaches have been the only means being leveraged to diagnose spinal disorders.
We develop an expert system based on a hybrid inference algorithm and comprehensive integrated knowledge.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Objective: Until now, traditional invasive approaches have been the only
means being leveraged to diagnose spinal disorders. Traditional manual
diagnostics require a high workload, and diagnostic errors are likely to occur
due to the prolonged work of physicians. In this research, we develop an expert
system based on a hybrid inference algorithm and comprehensive integrated
knowledge for assisting the experts in the fast and high-quality diagnosis of
spinal disorders.
Methods: First, for each spinal anomaly, the accurate and integrated
knowledge was acquired from related experts and resources. Second, based on
probability distributions and dependencies between symptoms of each anomaly, a
unique numerical value known as certainty effect value was assigned to each
symptom. Third, a new hybrid inference algorithm was designed to obtain
excellent performance, which was an incorporation of the Backward Chaining
Inference and Theory of Uncertainty.
Results: The proposed expert system was evaluated in two different phases,
real-world samples, and medical records evaluation. Evaluations show that in
terms of real-world samples analysis, the system achieved excellent accuracy.
Application of the system on the sample with anomalies revealed the degree of
severity of disorders and the risk of development of abnormalities in unhealthy
and healthy patients. In the case of medical records analysis, our expert
system proved to have promising performance, which was very close to those of
experts.
Conclusion: Evaluations suggest that the proposed expert system provides
promising performance, helping specialists to validate the accuracy and
integrity of their diagnosis. It can also serve as an intelligent educational
software for medical students to gain familiarity with spinal disorder
diagnosis process, and related symptoms.
Related papers
- MedReaMM: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Expert-Level Clinical Diagnostic Synthesis [61.266743965495884]
We introduce MedReaMM, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to synthesize heterogeneous clinical evidence.<n>MedReaMM comprises 625 expert-validated cases with an average of 2.79 medical images per case and a total of 1,042 standardized diagnoses annotated with ICD-11 codes.<n>We evaluate 23 Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and find that most achieve diagnostic accuracy scores below 50%, underscoring a substantial gap in multimodal diagnostic synthesis capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T09:37:53Z) - RareDxR1: Autonomous Medical Reasoning for Rare Disease Diagnosis Beyond Human Annotation [18.759964003865278]
We introduce RareDxR1, an end-to-end reasoning-centric large language model for open-domain rare disease diagnosis.<n>We synergize knowledge internalization with autonomous evolutionary learning, thereby bypassing reliance on structured phenotypes and closed-set decision-making.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that RareDxR1 achieves state-of-the-art accuracy across different benchmarks, marking a significant breakthrough in open-domain rare disease diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-30T20:25:53Z) - A Versatile AI Agent for Rare Disease Diagnosis and Risk Gene Prioritization [41.13722391440127]
Hygieia is a multi-modal AI system designed to support precision disease diagnosis.<n>It integrates phenotypic features, genetic profiles, and clinical records.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple diagnostic benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T13:19:42Z) - MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning [66.94527468532843]
We propose MultiDx, a two-stage diagnostic reasoning framework.<n>It first generates suspected diagnoses and reasoning paths by leveraging knowledge from web search, SOAP-formatted case, and clinical case database.<n>Then it integrates multi-perspective evidence through matching, voting, and differential diagnosis to generate the final prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T08:46:29Z) - Human-AI Co-reasoning for Clinical Diagnosis with Evidence-Integrated Language Agent [23.12438916515353]
PULSE is a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval.<n>In experiments, we compared PULSE's performance against physicians with varying levels of expertise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T07:39:05Z) - Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Fetal Orofacial Clefts and Advancing Medical Education [50.132847182375514]
Orofacial clefts are among the most common congenital craniofacial abnormalities.<n>We show that an artificial intelligence system can diagnose fetal orofacial clefts with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 93% and 95% respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-06T18:06:20Z) - Thinking Like a Doctor: Conversational Diagnosis through the Exploration of Diagnostic Knowledge Graphs [12.612647781309098]
We propose a conversational diagnosis system that explores a diagnostic knowledge graph to reason in two steps.<n>We use a realistic patient simulator that responds to the system's questions.<n>Experiments show improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency over strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T11:56:36Z) - RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z) - Brittleness and Promise: Knowledge Graph Based Reward Modeling for Diagnostic Reasoning [8.35131510062609]
Large language models (LLMs) show promise for diagnostic reasoning but often lack reliable, knowledge grounded inference.<n>We treat the LLM as a reward model of KG reasoning paths, where the model learns to judge whether a candidate path leads to correct diagnosis for a given patient input.<n>Our finding provides the first systematic assessment of "reward model style" reasoning over clinical KGs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T18:39:09Z) - How to Evaluate Medical AI [4.23552814358972]
We introduce Relative Precision and Recall of Algorithmic Diagnostics (RPAD and RRAD)<n>RPAD and RRAD compare AI outputs against multiple expert opinions rather than a single reference.<n>Large-scale study shows that top-performing models, such as DeepSeek-V3, achieve consistency on par with or exceeding expert consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-15T14:01:22Z) - End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z) - Multimodal Attention-Aware Fusion for Diagnosing Distal Myopathy: Evaluating Model Interpretability and Clinician Trust [19.107204920543676]
Distal myopathy represents a heterogeneous group of skeletal muscle disorders with broad clinical manifestations.<n>We propose a novel multimodal attention-aware fusion architecture that combines features extracted from two distinct deep learning models.<n>Our approach integrates these features through an attention gate mechanism, enhancing both predictive performance and interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T11:08:55Z) - An Agentic System for Rare Disease Diagnosis with Traceable Reasoning [58.78045864541539]
We introduce DeepRare, the first rare disease diagnosis agentic system powered by a large language model (LLM)<n>DeepRare generates ranked diagnostic hypotheses for rare diseases, each accompanied by a transparent chain of reasoning.<n>The system demonstrates exceptional diagnostic performance among 2,919 diseases, achieving 100% accuracy for 1013 diseases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T13:42:26Z) - A Multi-Site Study on AI-Driven Pathology Detection and Osteoarthritis Grading from Knee X-Ray [0.0]
Bone health disorders like osteoarthritis and osteoporosis pose major global health challenges.
This study presents an AI-powered system that analyzes knee X-rays to detect key pathologies.
It also grades osteoarthritis severity, enabling timely, personalized treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T06:41:22Z) - Expertise Is What We Want [0.0]
We share an application architecture, the Large Language Expert (LLE), that combines the flexibility and power of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the interpretability, explainability, and reliability of Expert Systems.
To highlight the power of the Large Language Expert (LLE) system, we built an LLE to assist with the workup of patients newly diagnosed with cancer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T18:05:15Z) - Uncertainty-aware abstention in medical diagnosis based on medical texts [87.88110503208016]
This study addresses the critical issue of reliability for AI-assisted medical diagnosis.
We focus on the selection prediction approach that allows the diagnosis system to abstain from providing the decision if it is not confident in the diagnosis.
We introduce HUQ-2, a new state-of-the-art method for enhancing reliability in selective prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T10:15:21Z) - DWARF: Disease-weighted network for attention map refinement [6.658039889530641]
This study addresses the "human out of the loop" and "trustworthiness" issues in medical image analysis by integrating medical professionals into the interpretability process.
We propose a disease-weighted attention map refinement network (DWARF) that leverages expert feedback to enhance model relevance and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T18:00:11Z) - Medical Dialogue Generation via Intuitive-then-Analytical Differential
Diagnosis [14.17497921394565]
We propose a medical dialogue generation framework with the Intuitive-then-Analytic Differential Diagnosis (IADDx)
Our method starts with a differential diagnosis via retrieval-based intuitive association and subsequently refines it through a graph-enhanced analytic procedure.
Experimental results on two datasets validate the efficacy of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T12:35:19Z) - A Foundational Framework and Methodology for Personalized Early and
Timely Diagnosis [84.6348989654916]
We propose the first foundational framework for early and timely diagnosis.
It builds on decision-theoretic approaches to outline the diagnosis process.
It integrates machine learning and statistical methodology for estimating the optimal personalized diagnostic path.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-26T14:42:31Z) - Bias in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI [12.857583780524847]
Unsupervised anomaly detection methods offer a promising and flexible alternative to supervised approaches.
In the current landscape, it is commonly assumed that differences between a test case and the training distribution are attributed solely to pathological conditions.
The presence of other potential sources of distributional shift, including scanner, age, sex, or race, is frequently overlooked.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-26T12:39:25Z) - Evaluating AI systems under uncertain ground truth: a case study in dermatology [43.8328264420381]
We show that ignoring uncertainty leads to overly optimistic estimates of model performance.
In skin condition classification, we find that a large portion of the dataset exhibits significant ground truth uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T10:33:45Z) - Towards Trustworthy Automatic Diagnosis Systems by Emulating Doctors'
Reasoning with Deep Reinforcement Learning [2.314562406457073]
We propose to model the evidence acquisition and automatic diagnosis tasks using a deep reinforcement learning framework.
We show that our approach performs better than existing models while maintaining competitive pathology prediction accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T17:17:17Z) - NeuralSympCheck: A Symptom Checking and Disease Diagnostic Neural Model
with Logic Regularization [59.15047491202254]
symptom checking systems inquire users for their symptoms and perform a rapid and affordable medical assessment of their condition.
We propose a new approach based on the supervised learning of neural models with logic regularization.
Our experiments show that the proposed approach outperforms the best existing methods in the accuracy of diagnosis when the number of diagnoses and symptoms is large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-02T07:57:17Z) - SpineOne: A One-Stage Detection Framework for Degenerative Discs and
Vertebrae [54.751251046196494]
We propose a one-stage detection framework termed SpineOne to simultaneously localize and classify degenerative discs and vertebrae from MRI slices.
SpineOne is built upon the following three key techniques: 1) a new design of the keypoint heatmap to facilitate simultaneous keypoint localization and classification; 2) the use of attention modules to better differentiate the representations between discs and vertebrae; and 3) a novel gradient-guided objective association mechanism to associate multiple learning objectives at the later training stage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-28T12:59:06Z) - Detecting Spurious Correlations with Sanity Tests for Artificial
Intelligence Guided Radiology Systems [22.249702822013045]
A critical component to deploying AI in radiology is to gain confidence in a developed system's efficacy and safety.
The current gold standard approach is to conduct an analytical validation of performance on a generalization dataset.
We describe a series of sanity tests to identify when a system performs well on development data for the wrong reasons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-04T14:14:05Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic
Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making.
We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z) - Towards Causality-Aware Inferring: A Sequential Discriminative Approach
for Medical Diagnosis [142.90770786804507]
Medical diagnosis assistant (MDA) aims to build an interactive diagnostic agent to sequentially inquire about symptoms for discriminating diseases.
This work attempts to address these critical issues in MDA by taking advantage of the causal diagram.
We propose a propensity-based patient simulator to effectively answer unrecorded inquiry by drawing knowledge from the other records.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-14T02:05:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.