Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09267v4
• Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:42:11 GMT
• Title: Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization
• Authors: Lijun Zhang, Peng Zhao, Zhen-Hua Zhuang, Tianbao Yang, Zhi-Hua Zhou
• Abstract summary: Group distributionally robust optimization (GDRO) Online learning techniques to reduce the number of samples required in each round from $m$ to $1$, keeping the same sample. A novel formulation of weighted GDRO, which allows us to derive distribution-dependent convergence rates.
• Score: 96.26317627118912
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates group distributionally robust optimization (GDRO), with the purpose to learn a model that performs well over $m$ different distributions. First, we formulate GDRO as a stochastic convex-concave saddle-point problem, and demonstrate that stochastic mirror descent (SMD), using $m$ samples in each iteration, achieves an $O(m (\log m)/\epsilon^2)$ sample complexity for finding an $\epsilon$-optimal solution, which matches the $\Omega(m/\epsilon^2)$ lower bound up to a logarithmic factor. Then, we make use of techniques from online learning to reduce the number of samples required in each round from $m$ to $1$, keeping the same sample complexity. Specifically, we cast GDRO as a two-players game where one player simply performs SMD and the other executes an online algorithm for non-oblivious multi-armed bandits. Next, we consider a more practical scenario where the number of samples that can be drawn from each distribution is different, and propose a novel formulation of weighted GDRO, which allows us to derive distribution-dependent convergence rates. Denote by $n_i$ the sample budget for the $i$-th distribution, and assume $n_1 \geq n_2 \geq \cdots \geq n_m$. In the first approach, we incorporate non-uniform sampling into SMD such that the sample budget is satisfied in expectation, and prove that the excess risk of the $i$-th distribution decreases at an $O(\sqrt{n_1 \log m}/n_i)$ rate. In the second approach, we use mini-batches to meet the budget exactly and also reduce the variance in stochastic gradients, and then leverage stochastic mirror-prox algorithm, which can exploit small variances, to optimize a carefully designed weighted GDRO problem. Under appropriate conditions, it attains an $O((\log m)/\sqrt{n_i})$ convergence rate, which almost matches the optimal $O(\sqrt{1/n_i})$ rate of only learning from the $i$-th distribution with $n_i$ samples.

Related papers

• Differentially Private Multi-Sampling from Distributions [4.292685318253575]
  We study the sample complexity of DP emphsingle-sampling i.e., the minimum number of samples needed to perform this task. We define two variants of emphmulti-sampling, where the goal is to privately approximate $m>1$ samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T19:14:05Z)
• Faster Diffusion Sampling with Randomized Midpoints: Sequential and Parallel [10.840582511203024]
  We show that our algorithm can be parallelized to run in only $widetilde O(log2 d)$ parallel rounds. We also show that our algorithm can be parallelized to run in only $widetilde O(log2 d)$ parallel rounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T01:34:34Z)
• Efficient Algorithms for Empirical Group Distributional Robust Optimization and Beyond [15.664414751701718]
  We formulate empirical GDRO as a $textittwo-level$ finite-sum convex-concave minimax optimization problem. We compute the snapshot and mirror snapshot point by a one-index-shifted weighted average, which distinguishes us from the naive ergodic average. Remarkably, our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method by a factor of $sqrtm$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T09:14:24Z)
• Perfect Sampling from Pairwise Comparisons [26.396901523831534]
  We study how to efficiently obtain perfect samples from a discrete distribution $mathcalD$ given access only to pairwise comparisons of elements of its support. We design a Markov chain whose stationary distribution coincides with $mathcalD$ and give an algorithm to obtain exact samples using the technique of Coupling from the Past.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T11:20:30Z)
• On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions [63.20009081099896]
  Social and real-world considerations have given rise to multi-distribution learning paradigms. We establish the optimal sample complexity of these learning paradigms and give algorithms that meet this sample complexity. Our algorithm design and analysis are enabled by our extensions of online learning techniques for solving zero-sum games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T19:07:26Z)
• Robust Learning of Optimal Auctions [84.13356290199603]
  We study the problem of learning revenue-optimal multi-bidder auctions from samples when the samples of bidders' valuations can be adversarially corrupted or drawn from distributions that are adversarially perturbed. We propose new algorithms that can learn a mechanism whose revenue is nearly optimal simultaneously for all true distributions'' that are $alpha$-close to the original distribution in Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T17:37:21Z)
• Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [67.02490430380415]
  We show that model-based MARL achieves a sample complexity of $tilde O(|S||B|(gamma)-3epsilon-2)$ for finding the Nash equilibrium (NE) value up to some $epsilon$ error. We also show that such a sample bound is minimax-optimal (up to logarithmic factors) if the algorithm is reward-agnostic, where the algorithm queries state transition samples without reward knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T03:25:24Z)
• A Provably Efficient Sample Collection Strategy for Reinforcement Learning [123.69175280309226]
  One of the challenges in online reinforcement learning (RL) is that the agent needs to trade off the exploration of the environment and the exploitation of the samples to optimize its behavior. We propose to tackle the exploration-exploitation problem following a decoupled approach composed of: 1) An "objective-specific" algorithm that prescribes how many samples to collect at which states, as if it has access to a generative model (i.e., sparse simulator of the environment); 2) An "objective-agnostic" sample collection responsible for generating the prescribed samples as fast as possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T15:17:35Z)
• Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [50.38446482252857]
  This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T17:53:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.