The Amplification Paradox in Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11225v2
• Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 07:43:52 GMT
• Title: The Amplification Paradox in Recommender Systems
• Authors: Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Veniamin Veselovsky, Robert West
• Abstract summary: We show through simulations that the collaborative-filtering nature of recommender systems and the nicheness of extreme content can resolve the apparent paradox. Our results call for a nuanced interpretation of algorithmic amplification'' and highlight the importance of modeling the utility of content to users when auditing recommender systems.
• Score: 12.723777984461693
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated audits of recommender systems found that blindly following recommendations leads users to increasingly partisan, conspiratorial, or false content. At the same time, studies using real user traces suggest that recommender systems are not the primary driver of attention toward extreme content; on the contrary, such content is mostly reached through other means, e.g., other websites. In this paper, we explain the following apparent paradox: if the recommendation algorithm favors extreme content, why is it not driving its consumption? With a simple agent-based model where users attribute different utilities to items in the recommender system, we show through simulations that the collaborative-filtering nature of recommender systems and the nicheness of extreme content can resolve the apparent paradox: although blindly following recommendations would indeed lead users to niche content, users rarely consume niche content when given the option because it is of low utility to them, which can lead the recommender system to deamplify such content. Our results call for a nuanced interpretation of ``algorithmic amplification'' and highlight the importance of modeling the utility of content to users when auditing recommender systems. Code available: https://github.com/epfl-dlab/amplification_paradox.

Related papers

• The Nah Bandit: Modeling User Non-compliance in Recommendation Systems [2.421459418045937]
  Expert with Clustering (EWC) is a hierarchical approach that incorporates feedback from both recommended and non-recommended options to accelerate user preference learning. EWC outperforms both supervised learning and traditional contextual bandit approaches. This work lays the foundation for future research in Nah Bandit, providing a robust framework for more effective recommendation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T03:01:02Z)
• Measuring Strategization in Recommendation: Users Adapt Their Behavior to Shape Future Content [66.71102704873185]
  We test for user strategization by conducting a lab experiment and survey. We find strong evidence of strategization across outcome metrics, including participants' dwell time and use of "likes" Our findings suggest that platforms cannot ignore the effect of their algorithms on user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:36:08Z)
• The Fault in Our Recommendations: On the Perils of Optimizing the Measurable [2.6217304977339473]
  We show that optimizing for engagement can lead to significant utility losses. We propose a utility-aware policy that initially recommends a mix of popular and niche content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T02:12:17Z)
• User-Controllable Recommendation via Counterfactual Retrospective and Prospective Explanations [96.45414741693119]
  We present a user-controllable recommender system that seamlessly integrates explainability and controllability. By providing both retrospective and prospective explanations through counterfactual reasoning, users can customize their control over the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T01:13:36Z)
• Recommending to Strategic Users [10.079698681921673]
  We show that users strategically choose content to influence the types of content they get recommended in the future. We propose three interventions that may improve recommendation quality when taking into account strategic consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T17:57:30Z)
• Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
  Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior. We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference. We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z)
• PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
  We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z)
• Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilities [34.288256311920904]
  We build a REINFORCE recommender agent, coined EcoAgent, to optimize a joint objective of user utility and the counterfactual utility lift of the provider associated with the recommended content. We offer a number of simulated experiments that shed light on both the benefits and the limitations of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T00:02:58Z)
• Echo Chambers in Collaborative Filtering Based Recommendation Systems [1.5140493624413542]
  We simulate the recommendations given by collaborative filtering algorithms on users in the MovieLens data set. We find that prolonged exposure to system-generated recommendations substantially decreases content diversity. Our work suggests that once these echo-chambers have been established, it is difficult for an individual user to break out by manipulating solely their own rating vector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T02:35:47Z)
• Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
  We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users. We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z)
• Survey for Trust-aware Recommender Systems: A Deep Learning Perspective [48.2733163413522]
  It becomes critical to embrace a trustworthy recommender system. This survey provides a systemic summary of three categories of trust-aware recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T02:11:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.