Echo Chambers in Collaborative Filtering Based Recommendation Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03890v1
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 02:35:47 GMT
- Title: Echo Chambers in Collaborative Filtering Based Recommendation Systems
- Authors: Emil Noordeh, Roman Levin, Ruochen Jiang, Harris Shadmany
- Abstract summary: We simulate the recommendations given by collaborative filtering algorithms on users in the MovieLens data set.
We find that prolonged exposure to system-generated recommendations substantially decreases content diversity.
Our work suggests that once these echo-chambers have been established, it is difficult for an individual user to break out by manipulating solely their own rating vector.
- Score: 1.5140493624413542
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recommendation systems underpin the serving of nearly all online content in
the modern age. From Youtube and Netflix recommendations, to Facebook feeds and
Google searches, these systems are designed to filter content to the predicted
preferences of users. Recently, these systems have faced growing criticism with
respect to their impact on content diversity, social polarization, and the
health of public discourse. In this work we simulate the recommendations given
by collaborative filtering algorithms on users in the MovieLens data set. We
find that prolonged exposure to system-generated recommendations substantially
decreases content diversity, moving individual users into "echo-chambers"
characterized by a narrow range of content. Furthermore, our work suggests that
once these echo-chambers have been established, it is difficult for an
individual user to break out by manipulating solely their own rating vector.
Related papers
- Uncovering the Deep Filter Bubble: Narrow Exposure in Short-Video
Recommendation [30.395376392259497]
Filter bubbles have been studied extensively within the context of online content platforms.
With the rise of short-video platforms, the filter bubble has been given extra attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T14:14:40Z) - The Impact of Recommendation Systems on Opinion Dynamics: Microscopic
versus Macroscopic Effects [1.4180331276028664]
We study the impact of recommendation systems on users, both from a microscopic (i.e., at the level of individual users) and a macroscopic perspective.
Our analysis reveals that shifts in the opinions of individual users do not always align with shifts in the opinion distribution of the population.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-16T11:44:51Z) - Improving Recommendation System Serendipity Through Lexicase Selection [53.57498970940369]
We propose a new serendipity metric to measure the presence of echo chambers and homophily in recommendation systems.
We then attempt to improve the diversity-preservation qualities of well known recommendation techniques by adopting a parent selection algorithm known as lexicase selection.
Our results show that lexicase selection, or a mixture of lexicase selection and ranking, outperforms its purely ranked counterparts in terms of personalization, coverage and our specifically designed serendipity benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T15:37:38Z) - The Amplification Paradox in Recommender Systems [12.723777984461693]
We show through simulations that the collaborative-filtering nature of recommender systems and the nicheness of extreme content can resolve the apparent paradox.
Our results call for a nuanced interpretation of algorithmic amplification'' and highlight the importance of modeling the utility of content to users when auditing recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T09:12:48Z) - Mitigating Filter Bubbles within Deep Recommender Systems [2.3590112541068575]
recommender systems have been known to intellectually isolate users from a variety of perspectives, or cause filter bubbles.
We characterize and mitigate this filter bubble effect by classifying various datapoints based on their user-item interaction history.
We mitigate this filter bubble effect without compromising accuracy by carefully retraining our recommender system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-16T22:00:10Z) - Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior.
We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference.
We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z) - Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation [76.75990595228666]
This paper formalizes a family of exposure fairness metrics that model the problem jointly from the perspective of both the consumers and producers.
Specifically, we consider group attributes for both types of stakeholders to identify and mitigate fairness concerns that go beyond individual users and items towards more systemic biases in recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-29T19:13:23Z) - PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User
Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process.
Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z) - Modurec: Recommender Systems with Feature and Time Modulation [50.51144496609274]
We propose Modurec: an autoencoder-based method that combines all available information using the feature-wise modulation mechanism.
We show on Movielens datasets that these modifications produce state-of-the-art results in most evaluated settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T09:18:33Z) - Survey of Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Filtering [3.670848852348134]
Collaborative filtering recommendation systems provide recommendations to users based on their own past preferences, as well as those of other users who share similar interests.
Users are often concerned about their privacy when using such systems, and many users are reluctant to provide accurate information to most online services.
Privacy-preserving collaborative filtering recommendation systems aim to provide users with accurate recommendations while maintaining certain guarantees about the privacy of their data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T17:14:50Z) - Sequential Recommender Systems: Challenges, Progress and Prospects [50.12218578518894]
sequential recommender systems (SRSs) try to understand and model the sequential user behaviors, the interactions between users and items, and the evolution of users preferences and item popularity over time.
We first present the characteristics of SRSs, then summarize and categorize the key challenges in this research area, followed by the corresponding research progress consisting of the most recent and representative developments on this topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-28T05:12:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.