Towards Trustable Skin Cancer Diagnosis via Rewriting Model's Decision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.00885v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 01:02:18 GMT
• Title: Towards Trustable Skin Cancer Diagnosis via Rewriting Model's Decision
• Authors: Siyuan Yan, Zhen Yu, Xuelin Zhang, Dwarikanath Mahapatra, Shekhar S. Chandra, Monika Janda, Peter Soyer, Zongyuan Ge
• Abstract summary: We introduce a human-in-the-loop framework in the model training process. Our method can automatically discover confounding factors. It is capable of learning confounding concepts using easily obtained concept exemplars.
• Score: 12.306688233127312
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks have demonstrated promising performance on image recognition tasks. However, they may heavily rely on confounding factors, using irrelevant artifacts or bias within the dataset as the cue to improve performance. When a model performs decision-making based on these spurious correlations, it can become untrustable and lead to catastrophic outcomes when deployed in the real-world scene. In this paper, we explore and try to solve this problem in the context of skin cancer diagnosis. We introduce a human-in-the-loop framework in the model training process such that users can observe and correct the model's decision logic when confounding behaviors happen. Specifically, our method can automatically discover confounding factors by analyzing the co-occurrence behavior of the samples. It is capable of learning confounding concepts using easily obtained concept exemplars. By mapping the black-box model's feature representation onto an explainable concept space, human users can interpret the concept and intervene via first order-logic instruction. We systematically evaluate our method on our newly crafted, well-controlled skin lesion dataset and several public skin lesion datasets. Experiments show that our method can effectively detect and remove confounding factors from datasets without any prior knowledge about the category distribution and does not require fully annotated concept labels. We also show that our method enables the model to focus on clinical-related concepts, improving the model's performance and trustworthiness during model inference.

Related papers

• Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
  This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance. Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z)
• Decoding Decision Reasoning: A Counterfactual-Powered Model for Knowledge Discovery [6.1521675665532545]
  In medical imaging, discerning the rationale behind an AI model's predictions is crucial for evaluating its reliability. We propose an explainable model that is equipped with both decision reasoning and feature identification capabilities. By implementing our method, we can efficiently identify and visualise class-specific features leveraged by the data-driven model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T19:00:38Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Robust and Interpretable Medical Image Classifiers via Concept Bottleneck Models [49.95603725998561]
  We propose a new paradigm to build robust and interpretable medical image classifiers with natural language concepts. Specifically, we first query clinical concepts from GPT-4, then transform latent image features into explicit concepts with a vision-language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T21:57:09Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Feature visualization for convolutional neural network models trained on neuroimaging data [0.0]
  We show for the first time results using feature visualization of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) We have trained CNNs for different tasks including sex classification and artificial lesion classification based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The resulting images reveal the learned concepts of the artificial lesions, including their shapes, but remain hard to interpret for abstract features in the sex classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T15:24:38Z)
• What Do You See in this Patient? Behavioral Testing of Clinical NLP Models [69.09570726777817]
  We introduce an extendable testing framework that evaluates the behavior of clinical outcome models regarding changes of the input. We show that model behavior varies drastically even when fine-tuned on the same data and that allegedly best-performing models have not always learned the most medically plausible patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T15:52:04Z)
• Deep Co-Attention Network for Multi-View Subspace Learning [73.3450258002607]
  We propose a deep co-attention network for multi-view subspace learning. It aims to extract both the common information and the complementary information in an adversarial setting. In particular, it uses a novel cross reconstruction loss and leverages the label information to guide the construction of the latent representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T18:46:44Z)
• (Un)fairness in Post-operative Complication Prediction Models [20.16366948502659]
  We consider a real-life example of risk estimation before surgery and investigate the potential for bias or unfairness of a variety of algorithms. Our approach creates transparent documentation of potential bias so that the users can apply the model carefully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T22:11:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.