Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04630v3
• Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 21:58:45 GMT
• Title: Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury
• Authors: Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Pier Francesco Caruso, Cecilia {\AA}kerlund, Lindsay Wilson, Robert D Stevens, David K Menon, Ewout W Steyerberg, David W Nelson, Ari Ercole, the CENTER-TBI investigators/participants
• Abstract summary: We integrate all heterogenous data stored in medical records (1,166 pre-ICU and ICU variables) We train recurrent neural network models to map a token-embedded time series representation of all variables. Highest-contributing variables include physician-based prognoses, CT features, and markers of neurological function.
• Score: 1.4887102120051716
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Existing methods to characterise the evolving condition of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) do not capture the context necessary for individualising treatment. Here, we integrate all heterogenous data stored in medical records (1,166 pre-ICU and ICU variables) to model the individualised contribution of clinical course to six-month functional outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOSE). On a prospective cohort (n=1,550, 65 centres) of TBI patients, we train recurrent neural network models to map a token-embedded time series representation of all variables (including missing values) to an ordinal GOSE prognosis every two hours. The full range of variables explains up to 52% (95% CI: 50%-54%) of the ordinal variance in functional outcome. Up to 91% (95% CI: 90%-91%) of this explanation is derived from pre-ICU and admission information (i.e., static variables). Information collected in the ICU (i.e., dynamic variables) increases explanation (by up to 5% [95% CI: 4%-6%]), though not enough to counter poorer overall performance in longer-stay (>5.75 days) patients. Highest-contributing variables include physician-based prognoses, CT features, and markers of neurological function. Whilst static information currently accounts for the majority of functional outcome explanation after TBI, data-driven analysis highlights investigative avenues to improve dynamic characterisation of longer-stay patients. Moreover, our modelling strategy proves useful for converting large patient records into interpretable time series with missing data integration and minimal processing.

Related papers

• Towards Personalised Patient Risk Prediction Using Temporal Hospital Data Trajectories [0.9545101073027095]
  We propose a pipeline that groups intensive care unit patients by the trajectories of observations data throughout their stay. Applying the pipeline to data from just the first four hours of each ICU stay assigns the majority of patients to the same cluster as when the entire stay duration is considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T15:53:26Z)
• Robust Meta-Model for Predicting the Need for Blood Transfusion in Non-traumatic ICU Patients [10.169599503547134]
  Blood transfusions, crucial in managing anemia and coagulopathy in ICU settings, require accurate prediction for effective resource allocation and patient risk assessment. This study aims to develop an advanced machine learning-based model to predict the probability of transfusion necessity over the next 24 hours for a diverse range of non-traumatic ICU patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T23:25:48Z)
• Multimodal Pretraining of Medical Time Series and Notes [45.89025874396911]
  Deep learning models show promise in extracting meaningful patterns, but they require extensive labeled data. We propose a novel approach employing self-supervised pretraining, focusing on the alignment of clinical measurements and notes. In downstream tasks, including in-hospital mortality prediction and phenotyping, our model outperforms baselines in settings where only a fraction of the data is labeled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T21:53:40Z)
• A Deep Learning Approach for Overall Survival Prediction in Lung Cancer with Missing Values [0.9349653765341301]
  We present a novel approach to survival analysis with missing values in the context of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This model exploits the strengths of the transformer architecture to account only for available features without requiring any imputation strategy. It is able to account for both censored and uncensored patients, as well as changes in risks over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T10:01:55Z)
• Unsupervised Pre-Training on Patient Population Graphs for Patient-Level Predictions [48.02011627390706]
  Pre-training has shown success in different areas of machine learning, such as Computer Vision (CV), Natural Language Processing (NLP) and medical imaging. In this paper, we apply unsupervised pre-training to heterogeneous, multi-modal EHR data for patient outcome prediction. We find that our proposed graph based pre-training method helps in modeling the data at a population level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-23T17:59:45Z)
• The leap to ordinal: functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury using artificial intelligence [1.4887102120051716]
  TBI outcomes are categorised by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) into 8, ordered levels of functional recovery at 6 months after injury. Existing ICU prognostic models predict binary outcomes at a certain threshold of GOSE. We developed ordinal prediction models that concurrently predict probabilities of each GOSE score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T02:29:19Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Cross-patient Model Development [3.109478324371548]
  We study differences in model performance and explainability when trained for all patients and one patient at a time. The results show that patients' demographics has a large impact on the performance and explainability and thus trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T10:51:04Z)
• On the explainability of hospitalization prediction on a large COVID-19 patient dataset [45.82374977939355]
  We develop various AI models to predict hospitalization on a large (over 110$k$) cohort of COVID-19 positive-tested US patients. Despite high data unbalance, the models reach average precision 0.96-0.98 (0.75-0.85), recall 0.96-0.98 (0.74-0.85), and $F_score 0.97-0.98 (0.79-0.83) on the non-hospitalized (or hospitalized) class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T10:23:38Z)
• SANSformers: Self-Supervised Forecasting in Electronic Health Records with Attention-Free Models [48.07469930813923]
  This work aims to forecast the demand for healthcare services, by predicting the number of patient visits to healthcare facilities. We introduce SANSformer, an attention-free sequential model designed with specific inductive biases to cater for the unique characteristics of EHR data. Our results illuminate the promising potential of tailored attention-free models and self-supervised pretraining in refining healthcare utilization predictions across various patient demographics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T08:23:56Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• Joint Prediction and Time Estimation of COVID-19 Developing Severe Symptoms using Chest CT Scan [49.209225484926634]
  We propose a joint classification and regression method to determine whether the patient would develop severe symptoms in the later time. To do this, the proposed method takes into account 1) the weight for each sample to reduce the outliers' influence and explore the problem of imbalance classification. Our proposed method yields 76.97% of accuracy for predicting the severe cases, 0.524 of the correlation coefficient, and 0.55 days difference for the converted time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T12:16:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.