No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06396v1
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:15:19 GMT
- Title: No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocation
- Abstract summary: We consider a fair resource allocation problem in the no-regret setting against an unrestricted adversary.
The problem is challenging due to the non-additive nature of the $alpha$-fairness function.
We propose an efficient online resource allocation policy, called Online Proportional Fair (OPF)
- Score: 18.955298050888736
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: We consider a fair resource allocation problem in the no-regret setting
against an unrestricted adversary. The objective is to allocate resources
equitably among several agents in an online fashion so that the difference of
the aggregate $\alpha$-fair utilities of the agents between an optimal static
clairvoyant allocation and that of the online policy grows sub-linearly with
time. The problem is challenging due to the non-additive nature of the
$\alpha$-fairness function. Previously, it was shown that no online policy can
exist for this problem with a sublinear standard regret. In this paper, we
propose an efficient online resource allocation policy, called Online
Proportional Fair (OPF), that achieves $c_\alpha$-approximate sublinear regret
with the approximation factor $c_\alpha=(1-\alpha)^{-(1-\alpha)}\leq 1.445,$
for $0\leq \alpha < 1$. The upper bound to the $c_\alpha$-regret for this
problem exhibits a surprising phase transition phenomenon. The regret bound
changes from a power-law to a constant at the critical exponent
$\alpha=\frac{1}{2}.$ As a corollary, our result also resolves an open problem
raised by Even-Dar et al. [2009] on designing an efficient no-regret policy for
the online job scheduling problem in certain parameter regimes. The proof of
our results introduces new algorithmic and analytical techniques, including
greedy estimation of the future gradients for non-additive global reward
functions and bootstrapping adaptive regret bounds, which may be of independent
interest.
Related papers
- A First-Order Learning Algorithm for Online Resource Allocation with Constant Regret [6.929167893040819]
We study a finite-horizon online resource allocation problem with initial resource capacities proportional to the horizon.<n>We present a primal first-order learning policy that, in each period, performs one gradient ascent update of the action coordinates associated with the current request type.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-05T05:30:29Z) - Quantile-Optimal Policy Learning under Unmeasured Confounding [55.72891849926314]
We study quantile-optimal policy learning where the goal is to find a policy whose reward distribution has the largest $alpha$-quantile for some $alpha in (0, 1)$.<n>Such a problem suffers from three main challenges: (i) nonlinearity of the quantile objective as a functional of the reward distribution, (ii) unobserved confounding issue, and (iii) insufficient coverage of the offline dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T13:37:38Z) - Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocation [14.956072215503797]
We present a novel Exponential Pricing algorithm for online resource allocation.<n>It is robust to corruptions in the outliers model and the value augmentation model.<n>It operates from conventional approaches that use an online learning algorithm for item pricing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-05T18:48:11Z) - Learning While Repositioning in On-Demand Vehicle Sharing Networks [4.724825031148413]
We consider a network inventory problem motivated by one-way, on-demand vehicle sharing services.
We show that a natural Lipschitz-bandit approach achieves a regret guarantee of $widetildeO(Tfracnn+1)$, which suffers from the exponential dependence on $n$.
Motivated by these challenges, we propose an Online Gradient Repositioning algorithm that relies solely on censored demand.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T15:16:02Z) - Online Resource Allocation in Episodic Markov Decision Processes [1.8416014644193066]
We formulate the problem as an online allocation problem in an episodic finite-horizon constrained Markov decision process.
We propose the observe-then-decide regime and improve the existing decide-then-observe regime.
We show that the regret against the static optimal policy that has access to the mean reward and mean resource consumption functions is bounded by $tilde O(rho-1H3/2SsqrtAT)$ with high probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T06:28:34Z) - Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Linear Bandits and Reinforcement
Learning: Adaptivity and Computational Efficiency [90.40062452292091]
We present the first computationally efficient algorithm for linear bandits with heteroscedastic noise.
Our algorithm is adaptive to the unknown variance of noise and achieves an $tildeO(d sqrtsum_k = 1K sigma_k2 + d)$ regret.
We also propose a variance-adaptive algorithm for linear mixture Markov decision processes (MDPs) in reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-21T00:17:24Z) - Autoregressive Bandits [58.46584210388307]
We propose a novel online learning setting, Autoregressive Bandits, in which the observed reward is governed by an autoregressive process of order $k$.
We show that, under mild assumptions on the reward process, the optimal policy can be conveniently computed.
We then devise a new optimistic regret minimization algorithm, namely, AutoRegressive Upper Confidence Bound (AR-UCB), that suffers sublinear regret of order $widetildemathcalO left( frac(k+1)3/2sqrtnT (1-G
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T21:37:36Z) - Corruption-Robust Algorithms with Uncertainty Weighting for Nonlinear
Contextual Bandits and Markov Decision Processes [59.61248760134937]
We propose an efficient algorithm to achieve a regret of $tildeO(sqrtT+zeta)$.
The proposed algorithm relies on the recently developed uncertainty-weighted least-squares regression from linear contextual bandit.
We generalize our algorithm to the episodic MDP setting and first achieve an additive dependence on the corruption level $zeta$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T15:04:56Z) - Near-Optimal Deployment Efficiency in Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning
with Linear Function Approximation [16.871660060209674]
We study the problem of deployment efficient reinforcement learning (RL) with linear function approximation under the emphreward-free exploration setting.
We propose a new algorithm that collects at most $widetildeO(fracd2H5epsilon2)$ trajectories within $H$ deployments to identify $epsilon$-optimal policy for any (possibly data-dependent) choice of reward functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T03:48:26Z) - Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimization [70.4342220499858]
We introduce novel online algorithms that can exploit smoothness and replace the dependence on $T$ in dynamic regret with problem-dependent quantities.
Our results are adaptive to the intrinsic difficulty of the problem, since the bounds are tighter than existing results for easy problems and safeguard the same rate in the worst case.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-29T02:42:59Z) - Online Allocation with Two-sided Resource Constraints [44.5635910908944]
We consider an online allocation problem subject to lower and upper resource constraints, where the requests arrive sequentially.
We propose a new algorithm that obtains $1-O(fracepsilonalpha-epsilon)$ -competitive ratio for the offline problems that know the entire requests ahead of time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-28T02:21:06Z) - Fairer LP-based Online Allocation [13.478067250930101]
We consider a Linear Program (LP)-based online resource allocation problem where a decision maker accepts or rejects incoming customer requests irrevocably.
We propose a fair algorithm that uses an interior-point LP solver and dynamically detects unfair resource spending.
Our approach do not formulate the fairness requirement as a constrain in the optimization instance, and instead we address the problem from the perspective of algorithm design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T17:45:20Z) - Online Sub-Sampling for Reinforcement Learning with General Function
Approximation [111.01990889581243]
In this paper, we establish an efficient online sub-sampling framework that measures the information gain of data points collected by an RL algorithm.
For a value-based method with complexity-bounded function class, we show that the policy only needs to be updated for $proptooperatornamepolylog(K)$ times.
In contrast to existing approaches that update the policy for at least $Omega(K)$ times, our approach drastically reduces the number of optimization calls in solving for a policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T07:36:25Z) - Joint Optimization of Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Policy Gradient Based Algorithm [50.50545326342971]
We formulate the problem of maximizing a non-linear concave function of multiple long-term objectives.<n>A policy-gradient based model-free algorithm is proposed for the problem.<n>The proposed algorithm is shown to achieve convergence to within an $epsilon$ of the global optima.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-28T22:20:54Z) - Policy Gradient for Continuing Tasks in Non-stationary Markov Decision
Processes [112.38662246621969]
Reinforcement learning considers the problem of finding policies that maximize an expected cumulative reward in a Markov decision process with unknown transition probabilities.
We compute unbiased navigation gradients of the value function which we use as ascent directions to update the policy.
A major drawback of policy gradient-type algorithms is that they are limited to episodic tasks unless stationarity assumptions are imposed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-16T15:15:42Z) - Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyond [7.433931244705934]
We introduce the emphregularized online allocation problem, a variant that includes a non-linear regularizer acting on the total resource consumption.
In this problem, requests repeatedly arrive over time and, for each request, a decision maker needs to take an action that generates a reward and consumes resources.
The objective is to simultaneously maximize additively separable rewards and the value of a non-separable regularizer subject to the resource constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T14:24:58Z) - Upper Confidence Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for CMDP with
Adversarial Loss [145.54544979467872]
We consider online learning for episodically constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs)
We propose a new emphupper confidence primal-dual algorithm, which only requires the trajectories sampled from the transition model.
Our analysis incorporates a new high-probability drift analysis of Lagrange multiplier processes into the celebrated regret analysis of upper confidence reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T05:02:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.