Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08266v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:45:44 GMT
• Title: Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS
• Authors: Mariam Guizani, Aileen Abril Castro-Guzman, Anita Sarma, Igor Steinmacher
• Abstract summary: We investigate what motivates companies to contribute and how they contribute to open source software (OSS) Data from semi-structured interviews reveal that company motivations can be categorized into four levels. We hope our findings nudge more companies to participate in the OSS ecosystem, helping make it robust, diverse, and sustainable.
• Score: 16.077274013150884
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Company engagement in open source (OSS) is now the new norm. From large technology companies to startups, companies are participating in the OSS ecosystem by open-sourcing their technology, sponsoring projects through funding or paid developer time. However, our understanding of the OSS ecosystem is rooted in the 'old world' model where individual contributors sustain OSS projects. In this work, we create a more comprehensive understanding of the hybrid OSS landscape by investigating what motivates companies to contribute and how they contribute to OSS. We conducted interviews with 20 participants who have different roles (e.g., CEO, OSPO Lead, Ecosystem Strategist) at 17 different companies of different sizes from large companies (e.g. Microsoft, RedHat, Google, Spotify) to startups. Data from semi-structured interviews reveal that company motivations can be categorized into four levels (Founders' Vision, Reputation, Business Advantage, and Reciprocity) and companies participate through different mechanisms (e.g., Developers' Time, Mentoring Time, Advocacy & Promotion Time), each of which tie to the different types of motivations. We hope our findings nudge more companies to participate in the OSS ecosystem, helping make it robust, diverse, and sustainable.

Related papers

• Characterising Open Source Co-opetition in Company-hosted Open Source Software Projects: The Cases of PyTorch, TensorFlow, and Transformers [5.2337753974570616]
  Companies, including market rivals, have long collaborated on the development of open source software (OSS) "Open source co-opetition" results in a tangle of co-operation and competition known as "open source co-opetition"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T19:35:41Z)
• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• Systematic Literature Review of Commercial Participation in Open Source Software [20.727062223873986]
  We collected 92 papers and organized them based on their research topics. We found the explored motivations of companies are mainly from economic, technological, and social aspects. Researchers also explored how commercial participation affects OSS development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T06:50:01Z)
• Unveiling Diversity: Empowering OSS Project Leaders with Community Diversity and Turnover Dashboards [51.67585198094836]
  CommunityTapestry is a dynamic real-time community dashboard. It presents key diversity and turnover signals that we identified from the literature. It helped project leaders identify areas of improvement and gave them actionable information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T22:12:57Z)
• An Exploratory Study on the Evidence of Hackathons' Role in Solving OSS Newcomers' Challenges [54.56931759953522]
  We aim to understand and discuss the challenges newcomers face when joining an OSS project. We collect evidence on how hackathons were used to address those challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T15:40:19Z)
• Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
• Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Models [64.02855828418608]
  We propose Ecosystem Graphs as a documentation framework to transparently centralize knowledge of this ecosystem. Ecosystem Graphs is composed of assets (datasets, models, applications) linked together by dependencies that indicate technical (e.g. how Bing relies on GPT-4) and social (e.g. how Microsoft relies on OpenAI) relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T07:18:29Z)
• Web3: The Next Internet Revolution [50.16560061003771]
  Next internet revolution: Web3 is going to open new opportunities for traditional social models. Decentralized finance will be global, and open with financial inclusiveness for unbanked people. Several worthwhile future research directions of Web3 are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T23:37:43Z)
• Construction and Applications of Billion-Scale Pre-Trained Multimodal Business Knowledge Graph [64.42060648398743]
  We introduce the process of building an open business knowledge graph (OpenBG) derived from a well-known enterprise, Alibaba Group. OpenBG is an open business KG of unprecedented scale: 2.6 billion triples with more than 88 million entities covering over 1 million core classes/concepts and 2,681 types of relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T04:03:26Z)
• Leaving My Fingerprints: Motivations and Challenges of Contributing to OSS for Social Good [17.145094780239564]
  We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with OSS for Social Good contributors. We find that the majority of contributors demonstrate a distinction between OSS4SG and OSS. OSS4SG contributors evaluate the owners of the project significantly more than OSS contributors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T21:50:11Z)
• Please Don't Go -- A Comprehensive Approach to Increase Women's Participation in Open Source Software [11.326760036768068]
  Women represent less than 24% of employees in the software development industry. Despite efforts to increase diversity and multi-gendered participation, women are even more underrepresented in Open Source Software (OSS) projects. I will identify different OSS career pathways and develop a holistic view of women's motivations to join or leave OSS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T23:23:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.