Logistic-Normal Likelihoods for Heteroscedastic Label Noise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02849v2
• Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 07:38:32 GMT
• Title: Logistic-Normal Likelihoods for Heteroscedastic Label Noise
• Authors: Erik Englesson, Amir Mehrpanah, Hossein Azizpour
• Abstract summary: A natural way of estimating heteroscedastic label noise in regression is to model the observed (potentially noisy) target as a sample from a normal distribution. We propose an extension of this simple and probabilistic approach to classification that has the same desirable loss attenuation properties.
• Score: 6.947162493996924
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A natural way of estimating heteroscedastic label noise in regression is to model the observed (potentially noisy) target as a sample from a normal distribution, whose parameters can be learned by minimizing the negative log-likelihood. This formulation has desirable loss attenuation properties, as it reduces the contribution of high-error examples. Intuitively, this behavior can improve robustness against label noise by reducing overfitting. We propose an extension of this simple and probabilistic approach to classification that has the same desirable loss attenuation properties. Furthermore, we discuss and address some practical challenges of this extension. We evaluate the effectiveness of the method by measuring its robustness against label noise in classification. We perform enlightening experiments exploring the inner workings of the method, including sensitivity to hyperparameters, ablation studies, and other insightful analyses.

Related papers

• Extracting Clean and Balanced Subset for Noisy Long-tailed Classification [66.47809135771698]
  We develop a novel pseudo labeling method using class prototypes from the perspective of distribution matching. By setting a manually-specific probability measure, we can reduce the side-effects of noisy and long-tailed data simultaneously. Our method can extract this class-balanced subset with clean labels, which brings effective performance gains for long-tailed classification with label noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:34:37Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• Hypothesis Testing for Class-Conditional Noise Using Local Maximum Likelihood [1.8798171797988192]
  In supervised learning, automatically assessing the quality of the labels before any learning takes place remains an open research question. In this paper we show how similar procedures can be followed when the underlying model is a product of Local Maximum Likelihood Estimation. This different view allows for wider applicability of the tests by offering users access to a richer model class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:14:58Z)
• Robust Estimation of Causal Heteroscedastic Noise Models [7.568978862189266]
  Student's $t$-distribution is known for its robustness in accounting for sampling variability with smaller sample sizes and extreme values without significantly altering the overall distribution shape. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that our estimators are more robust and achieve better overall performance across synthetic and real benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T02:26:35Z)
• May the Noise be with you: Adversarial Training without Adversarial Examples [3.4673556247932225]
  We investigate the question: Can we obtain adversarially-trained models without training on adversarial? Our proposed approach incorporates inherentity by embedding Gaussian noise within the layers of the NN model at training time. Our work contributes adversarially trained networks using a completely different approach, with empirically similar robustness to adversarial training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T08:22:28Z)
• Label Noise: Correcting the Forward-Correction [0.0]
  Training neural network classifiers on datasets with label noise poses a risk of overfitting them to the noisy labels. We propose an approach to tackling overfitting caused by label noise. Motivated by this observation, we propose imposing a lower bound on the training loss to mitigate overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T19:41:19Z)
• Doubly Stochastic Models: Learning with Unbiased Label Noises and Inference Stability [85.1044381834036]
  We investigate the implicit regularization effects of label noises under mini-batch sampling settings of gradient descent. We find such implicit regularizer would favor some convergence points that could stabilize model outputs against perturbation of parameters. Our work doesn't assume SGD as an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck like process and achieve a more general result with convergence of approximation proved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T14:09:07Z)
• Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
  Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data. We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z)
• Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization Approach [94.10051154390237]
  Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates. We show that this robust optimization approach can extend a wide range of causal adjustment methods to perform partial identification. Across synthetic and real datasets, we find that this approach provides ATE bounds with a higher coverage probability than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T04:24:26Z)
• Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noise [27.885927200376386]
  We show that open-set noisy labels can be non-toxic and even benefit the robustness against inherent noisy labels. We propose a simple yet effective regularization by introducing Open-set samples with Dynamic Noisy Labels (ODNL) into training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T07:15:50Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.