Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06868v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 00:08:08 GMT
• Title: Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation
• Authors: Giovana Morais, Matthew E. P. Davies, Marcelo Queiroz, and Magdalena Fuentes
• Abstract summary: Self-supervision methods learn representations by solving pretext tasks that do not require human-generated labels. We study the relationship between the input representation and data distribution for self-supervised tempo estimation.
• Score: 0.783970968131292
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-supervision methods learn representations by solving pretext tasks that do not require human-generated labels, alleviating the need for time-consuming annotations. These methods have been applied in computer vision, natural language processing, environmental sound analysis, and recently in music information retrieval, e.g. for pitch estimation. Particularly in the context of music, there are few insights about the fragility of these models regarding different distributions of data, and how they could be mitigated. In this paper, we explore these questions by dissecting a self-supervised model for pitch estimation adapted for tempo estimation via rigorous experimentation with synthetic data. Specifically, we study the relationship between the input representation and data distribution for self-supervised tempo estimation.

Related papers

• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a time series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context. We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters. Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• XForecast: Evaluating Natural Language Explanations for Time Series Forecasting [72.57427992446698]
  Time series forecasting aids decision-making, especially for stakeholders who rely on accurate predictions. Traditional explainable AI (XAI) methods, which underline feature or temporal importance, often require expert knowledge. evaluating forecast NLEs is difficult due to the complex causal relationships in time series data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:16:39Z)
• A Survey on Diffusion Models for Time Series and Spatio-Temporal Data [92.1255811066468]
  We review the use of diffusion models in time series and S-temporal data, categorizing them by model, task type, data modality, and practical application domain. We categorize diffusion models into unconditioned and conditioned types discuss time series and S-temporal data separately. Our survey covers their application extensively in various fields including healthcare, recommendation, climate, energy, audio, and transportation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T17:19:40Z)
• Tempo estimation as fully self-supervised binary classification [6.255143207183722]
  We propose a fully self-supervised approach that does not rely on any human labeled data. Our method builds on the fact that generic (music) audio embeddings already encode a variety of properties, including information about tempo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T00:15:16Z)
• Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language Models [52.15056231665816]
  We propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) We demonstrate self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge, toxicity, and long-range context dependence. We find strong correlations between self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T17:59:09Z)
• Interpretation of Time-Series Deep Models: A Survey [27.582644914283136]
  We present a wide range of post-hoc interpretation methods for time-series models based on backpropagation, perturbation, and approximation. We also want to bring focus onto inherently interpretable models, a novel category of interpretation where human-understandable information is designed within the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T23:43:26Z)
• TempSAL -- Uncovering Temporal Information for Deep Saliency Prediction [64.63645677568384]
  We introduce a novel saliency prediction model that learns to output saliency maps in sequential time intervals. Our approach locally modulates the saliency predictions by combining the learned temporal maps. Our code will be publicly available on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T22:10:16Z)
• TACTiS: Transformer-Attentional Copulas for Time Series [76.71406465526454]
  estimation of time-varying quantities is a fundamental component of decision making in fields such as healthcare and finance. We propose a versatile method that estimates joint distributions using an attention-based decoder. We show that our model produces state-of-the-art predictions on several real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T21:37:29Z)
• Evaluation of Local Explanation Methods for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting [0.21094707683348418]
  Local interpretability is important in determining why a model makes particular predictions. Despite the recent focus on AI interpretability, there has been a lack of research in local interpretability methods for time series forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T21:15:28Z)
• TSInsight: A local-global attribution framework for interpretability in time-series data [5.174367472975529]
  We propose an auto-encoder to the classifier with a sparsity-inducing norm on its output and fine-tune it based on the gradients from the classifier and a reconstruction penalty. TSInsight learns to preserve features that are important for prediction by the classifier and suppresses those that are irrelevant. In contrast to most other attribution frameworks, TSInsight is capable of generating both instance-based and model-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T19:34:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.