The Future of ChatGPT-enabled Labor Market: A Preliminary Study in China

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09823v4
• Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 05:59:47 GMT
• Title: The Future of ChatGPT-enabled Labor Market: A Preliminary Study in China
• Authors: Lan Chen, Xi Chen, Shiyu Wu, Yaqi Yang, Meng Chang, Hengshu Zhu
• Abstract summary: We study the future of ChatGPT-enabled labor market from the view of Human-AI Symbiosis instead of Human-AI Confrontation. Results indicate that about 28% of occupations in the current labor market require ChatGPT-related skills. Additional 45% occupations in the future will require ChatGPT-related skills.
• Score: 22.120632047061235
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As a phenomenal large language model, ChatGPT has achieved unparalleled success in various real-world tasks and increasingly plays an important role in our daily lives and work. However, extensive concerns are also raised about the potential ethical issues, especially about whether ChatGPT-like artificial general intelligence (AGI) will replace human jobs. To this end, in this paper, we introduce a preliminary data-driven study on the future of ChatGPT-enabled labor market from the view of Human-AI Symbiosis instead of Human-AI Confrontation. To be specific, we first conduct an in-depth analysis of large-scale job posting data in BOSS Zhipin, the largest online recruitment platform in China. The results indicate that about 28% of occupations in the current labor market require ChatGPT-related skills. Furthermore, based on a large-scale occupation-centered knowledge graph, we develop a semantic information enhanced collaborative filtering algorithm to predict the future occupation-skill relations in the labor market. As a result, we find that additional 45% occupations in the future will require ChatGPT-related skills. In particular, industries related to technology, products, and operations are expected to have higher proficiency requirements for ChatGPT-related skills, while the manufacturing, services, education, and health science related industries will have lower requirements for ChatGPT-related skills.

Related papers

• Exploring ChatGPT and its Impact on Society [7.652195319352287]
  ChatGPT is a large language model that can generate human-like responses in a conversational context. It has the potential to revolutionize various industries and transform the way we interact with technology. However, the use of ChatGPT has also raised several concerns, including ethical, social, and employment challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:44:35Z)
• Characteristics of ChatGPT users from Germany: implications for the digital divide from web tracking data [2.638878351659023]
  We examine user characteristics that predict usage of the AI-powered conversational agent ChatGPT. We find full-time employment and more children to be barriers to ChatGPT activity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T11:31:54Z)
• "Generate" the Future of Work through AI: Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets [4.955822723273599]
  Large Language Model (LLM) based generative AI, such as ChatGPT, is considered the first generation of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Our paper offers crucial insights into AI's influence on labor markets and individuals' reactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T19:45:00Z)
• Decoding ChatGPT: A Taxonomy of Existing Research, Current Challenges, and Possible Future Directions [2.5427838419316946]
  Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has gained significant interest and attention since its launch in November 2022. We present a comprehensive review of over 100 Scopus-indexed publications on ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T11:10:04Z)
• ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning [70.57126720079971]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as the most important breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) This paper evaluates ChatGPT on 7 different tasks, covering 37 diverse languages with high, medium, low, and extremely low resources. Compared to the performance of previous models, our extensive experimental results demonstrate a worse performance of ChatGPT for different NLP tasks and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T05:08:52Z)
• ChatGPT-Crawler: Find out if ChatGPT really knows what it's talking about [15.19126287569545]
  This research examines the responses generated by ChatGPT from different Conversational QA corpora. The study employed BERT similarity scores to compare these responses with correct answers and obtain Natural Language Inference(NLI) labels. The study identified instances where ChatGPT provided incorrect answers to questions, providing insights into areas where the model may be prone to error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T18:42:47Z)
• A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need? [112.12974778019304]
  generative AI (AIGC, a.k.a AI-generated content) has made headlines everywhere because of its ability to analyze and create text, images, and beyond. In the era of AI transitioning from pure analysis to creation, it is worth noting that ChatGPT, with its most recent language model GPT-4, is just a tool out of numerous AIGC tasks. This work focuses on the technological development of various AIGC tasks based on their output type, including text, images, videos, 3D content, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T10:09:47Z)
• Does Synthetic Data Generation of LLMs Help Clinical Text Mining? [51.205078179427645]
  We investigate the potential of OpenAI's ChatGPT to aid in clinical text mining. We propose a new training paradigm that involves generating a vast quantity of high-quality synthetic data. Our method has resulted in significant improvements in the performance of downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T03:56:31Z)
• Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
  ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.