Data as voters: instance selection using approval-based multi-winner voting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09995v2
• Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:18:47 GMT
• Title: Data as voters: instance selection using approval-based multi-winner voting
• Authors: Luis Sánchez-Fernández, Jesús A. Fisteus, Rafael López-Zaragoza,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel approach to the instance selection problem in machine learning (or data mining) In our model, instances play a double role as voters and candidates. For SVMs, we have obtained slight increases in the average accuracy by using several voting rules that satisfy EJR or PJR.
• Score: 1.597617022056624
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a novel approach to the instance selection problem in machine learning (or data mining). Our approach is based on recent results on (proportional) representation in approval-based multi-winner elections. In our model, instances play a double role as voters and candidates. The approval set of each instance in the training set (acting as a voter) is defined from the concept of local set, which already exists in the literature. We then select the election winners by using a representative voting rule, and such winners are the data instances kept in the reduced training set. Our experiments show that, for KNN, the rule Simple 2-EJR (a variant of the Simple EJR voting rule that satisfies 2-EJR) outperforms all the state-of-the-art algorithms and all the baselines that we consider in this paper in terms of accuracy vs reduction. For SVMs, we have obtained slight increases in the average accuracy by using several voting rules that satisfy EJR or PJR compared to the results obtained with the original datasets.

Related papers

• Improving the Computational Efficiency of Adaptive Audits of IRV Elections [54.427049258408424]
  AWAIRE can audit IRV contests with any number of candidates, but the original implementation incurred memory and computation costs that grew superexponentially with the number of candidates. This paper improves the algorithmic implementation of AWAIRE in three ways that make it practical to audit IRV contests with 55 candidates, compared to the previous 6 candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T13:28:00Z)
• Efficient Weighting Schemes for Auditing Instant-Runoff Voting Elections [57.67176250198289]
  AWAIRE involves adaptively weighted averages of test statistics, essentially "learning" an effective set of hypotheses to test. We explore schemes and settings more extensively, to identify and recommend efficient choices for practice. A limitation of the current AWAIRE implementation is its restriction to a small number of candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T10:13:01Z)
• Adaptively Weighted Audits of Instant-Runoff Voting Elections: AWAIRE [61.872917066847855]
  Methods for auditing instant-runoff voting (IRV) elections are either not risk-limiting or require cast vote records (CVRs), the voting system's electronic record of the votes on each ballot. We develop an RLA method that uses adaptively weighted averages of test supermartingales to efficiently audit IRV elections when CVRs are not available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T15:55:34Z)
• Private Multi-Winner Voting for Machine Learning [48.0093793427039]
  We propose three new DP multi-winner mechanisms: Binary, $tau$, and Powerset voting. Binary voting operates independently per label through composition. $tau$ voting bounds votes optimally in their $ell$ norm for tight data-independent guarantees. Powerset voting operates over the entire binary vector by viewing the possible outcomes as a power set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T20:06:46Z)
• Ballot-Polling Audits of Instant-Runoff Voting Elections with a Dirichlet-Tree Model [23.14629947453497]
  Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is used in several countries around the world. It requires voters to rank candidates in order of preference, and uses a counting algorithm that is more complex than systems such as first-past-the-post or scoring rules. An even more complex system, the single transferable vote (STV), is used when multiple candidates need to be elected. There is currently no known risk-limiting audit (RLA) method for STV, other than a full manual count of the ballots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T15:35:50Z)
• Expected Frequency Matrices of Elections: Computation, Geometry, and Preference Learning [58.23459346724491]
  We use the "map of elections" approach of Szufa et al. (AAMAS 2020) to analyze several well-known vote distributions. We draw the "skeleton map" of distributions, evaluate its robustness, and analyze its properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T17:40:22Z)
• The Complexity of Learning Approval-Based Multiwinner Voting Rules [9.071560867542647]
  We study the learnability of multiwinner voting, focusing on the class of approval-based committee scoring (ABCS) rules. Our goal is to learn a target rule (i.e., to learn the corresponding scoring function) using information about the winning committees of a small number of profiles. We prove that deciding whether there exists some ABCS rule that makes a given committee winning in a given profile is a hard problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T08:25:05Z)
• FastCorrect 2: Fast Error Correction on Multiple Candidates for Automatic Speech Recognition [92.12910821300034]
  We propose FastCorrect 2, an error correction model that takes multiple ASR candidates as input for better correction accuracy. FastCorrect 2 achieves better performance than the cascaded re-scoring and correction pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T13:48:03Z)
• Learning to Elect [7.893831644671976]
  Voting systems have a wide range of applications including recommender systems, web search, product design and elections. We show that set-input neural network architectures such as Set Transformers, fully-connected graph networks and DeepSets are both theoretically and empirically well-suited for learning voting rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:55:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.