An explanation of the Bell experiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05299v6
• Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 11:30:01 GMT
• Title: An explanation of the Bell experiment
• Authors: Inge S. Helland
• Abstract summary: Bell experiment is discussed in the light of a new approach to the foundation of quantum mechanics. It is concluded from the basic model that the mind of any observer must be limited in some way.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Bell experiment is discussed in the light of a new approach to the foundation of quantum mechanics. It is concluded from the basic model that the mind of any observer must be limited in some way: In certain contexts, he is simply not able to keep enough variables in his mind when making decisions. This has consequences for Bell's theorem, but it also seems to have wider consequences.

Related papers

• Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter [0.0]
  Bell inequalities represent a milestone for contemporary Physics. Strong debate is still ongoing on the actual meaning of Bell inequality tests. Recent work achieves for the first time an experimental estimation of the entire Bell-CHSH parameter from a single entangled pair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T08:11:40Z)
• The Evolution of the Bell Notion of Beable: from Bohr to Primitive Ontology [0.0]
  John S. Bell introduced the notion of beable, as opposed to the standard notion of observable, in order to emphasize the need for an unambiguous formulation of quantum mechanics. I show that Bell formulated in fact two different theories of beables. The first is somehow reminiscent of the Bohr views on quantum mechanics but, at the same time, is curiously adopted by Bell as a critical tool against the Copenhagen interpretation. I consider how the distinction between the two formulations of the Bell theory of beables fares vis-a-vis the complex relationship between the theory of beables and the details of the Primitive Ontology
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:55:15Z)
• The Bell experiment; an epistemological approach [0.0]
  The Nobel prize in physics for 2022 was given for performing Bell experiments with varying degree of sophistication. It is argued that any independent observer must have a limitation. A related new approach to the foundation of quantum mechanics is briefly sketched.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T10:31:33Z)
• Bell nonlocality in networks [62.997667081978825]
  Bell's theorem proves that quantum theory is inconsistent with local physical models. In the last decade, the investigation of nonlocality has moved beyond Bell's theorem to consider more sophisticated experiments. This review discusses the main concepts, methods, results and future challenges in the emerging topic of Bell nonlocality in networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T18:00:48Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
  Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic. "Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected. "Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
  An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false. The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z)
• Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
  A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it. We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.