Clarifying System 1 & 2 through the Common Model of Cognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10654v1
• Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 02:25:03 GMT
• Title: Clarifying System 1 & 2 through the Common Model of Cognition
• Authors: Brendan Conway-Smith and Robert L. West
• Abstract summary: We use the Common Model of Cognition to ground System-1 and System-2. We aim to clarify their underlying mechanisms, persisting misconceptions, and implications for metacognition.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There have been increasing challenges to dual-system descriptions of System-1 and System-2, critiquing them as imprecise and fostering misconceptions. We address these issues here by way of Dennett's appeal to use computational thinking as an analytical tool, specifically we employ the Common Model of Cognition. Results show that the characteristics thought to be distinctive of System-1 and System-2 instead form a spectrum of cognitive properties. By grounding System-1 and System-2 in the Common Model we aim to clarify their underlying mechanisms, persisting misconceptions, and implications for metacognition.

Related papers

• Identifiability Analysis of Linear ODE Systems with Hidden Confounders [45.14890063421295]
  This paper presents a systematic analysis of identifiability in linear ODE systems incorporating hidden confounders. In the first case, latent confounders exhibit no causal relationships, yet their evolution adheres to specific forms. Subsequently, we extend this analysis to encompass scenarios where hidden confounders exhibit causal dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T10:15:56Z)
• Unified Causality Analysis Based on the Degrees of Freedom [1.2289361708127877]
  This paper presents a unified method capable of identifying fundamental causal relationships between pairs of systems. By analyzing the degrees of freedom in the system, our approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of both causal influence and hidden confounders. This unified framework is validated through theoretical models and simulations, demonstrating its robustness and potential for broader application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T10:57:35Z)
• Quantifying and combining uncertainty for improving the behavior of Digital Twin Systems [1.7726648147818043]
  We focus on the Digital Twins of adaptive systems, which are particularly complex to design, verify, and optimize. We propose the explicit representation and treatment of the uncertainty of both twins, and show how this enables a more accurate comparison of their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T09:46:40Z)
• Representing Timed Automata and Timing Anomalies of Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Knowledge Graphs [51.98400002538092]
  This paper aims to improve model-based anomaly detection in CPPS by combining the learned timed automaton with a formal knowledge graph about the system. Both the model and the detected anomalies are described in the knowledge graph in order to allow operators an easier interpretation of the model and the detected anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T15:25:57Z)
• AAAI 2022 Fall Symposium: System-1 and System-2 realized within the Common Model of Cognition [0.0]
  We situating System-1 and System-2 within the Common Model of Cognition. Results show that what are thought to be distinctive characteristics of System-1 and 2 instead form a spectrum of cognitive properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T01:28:06Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Learning Physical Concepts in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Case Study [72.74318982275052]
  We provide an overview of the current state of research regarding methods for learning physical concepts in time series data. We also analyze the most important methods from the current state of the art using the example of a three-tank system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T14:24:52Z)
• Improving Coherence and Consistency in Neural Sequence Models with Dual-System, Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning [49.6928533575956]
  We use neural inference to mediate between the neural System 1 and the logical System 2. Results in robust story generation and grounded instruction-following show that this approach can increase the coherence and accuracy of neurally-based generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T17:59:49Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)
• End-to-End Models for the Analysis of System 1 and System 2 Interactions based on Eye-Tracking Data [99.00520068425759]
  We propose a computational method, within a modified visual version of the well-known Stroop test, for the identification of different tasks and potential conflicts events. A statistical analysis shows that the selected variables can characterize the variation of attentive load within different scenarios. We show that Machine Learning techniques allow to distinguish between different tasks with a good classification accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T17:46:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.