Model-Free RL Agents Demonstrate System 1-Like Intentionality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18299v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:21:50 GMT
• Title: Model-Free RL Agents Demonstrate System 1-Like Intentionality
• Authors: Hal Ashton, Matija Franklin,
• Abstract summary: We argue that model-free reinforcement learning agents exhibit behaviours that can be analogised to System 1 processes in human cognition. We propose a novel framework linking the dichotomy of System 1 and System 2 to the distinction between model-free and model-based RL.
• Score: 16.427085062620215
• License:
• Abstract: This paper argues that model-free reinforcement learning (RL) agents, while lacking explicit planning mechanisms, exhibit behaviours that can be analogised to System 1 ("thinking fast") processes in human cognition. Unlike model-based RL agents, which operate akin to System 2 ("thinking slow") reasoning by leveraging internal representations for planning, model-free agents react to environmental stimuli without anticipatory modelling. We propose a novel framework linking the dichotomy of System 1 and System 2 to the distinction between model-free and model-based RL. This framing challenges the prevailing assumption that intentionality and purposeful behaviour require planning, suggesting instead that intentionality can manifest in the structured, reactive behaviours of model-free agents. By drawing on interdisciplinary insights from cognitive psychology, legal theory, and experimental jurisprudence, we explore the implications of this perspective for attributing responsibility and ensuring AI safety. These insights advocate for a broader, contextually informed interpretation of intentionality in RL systems, with implications for their ethical deployment and regulation.

Related papers

• On the Reasoning Capacity of AI Models and How to Quantify It [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have intensified the debate surrounding the fundamental nature of their reasoning capabilities. While achieving high performance on benchmarks such as GPQA and MMLU, these models exhibit limitations in more complex reasoning tasks. We propose a novel phenomenological approach that goes beyond traditional accuracy metrics to probe the underlying mechanisms of model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T16:58:18Z)
• Causal Abstraction in Model Interpretability: A Compact Survey [5.963324728136442]
  causal abstraction provides a principled approach to understanding and explaining the causal mechanisms underlying model behavior. This survey paper delves into the realm of causal abstraction, examining its theoretical foundations, practical applications, and implications for the field of model interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T12:24:28Z)
• Unified Causality Analysis Based on the Degrees of Freedom [1.2289361708127877]
  This paper presents a unified method capable of identifying fundamental causal relationships between pairs of systems. By analyzing the degrees of freedom in the system, our approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of both causal influence and hidden confounders. This unified framework is validated through theoretical models and simulations, demonstrating its robustness and potential for broader application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T10:57:35Z)
• Co-designing heterogeneous models: a distributed systems approach [0.40964539027092917]
  This paper presents a modelling approach tailored for heterogeneous systems based on three elements. An inferentialist interpretation of what a model is, a distributed systems metaphor and a co-design cycle describe the practical design and construction of the model. We explore the suitability of this method in the context of three different security-oriented models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T13:35:38Z)
• A Unifying Framework for Action-Conditional Self-Predictive Reinforcement Learning [48.59516337905877]
  Learning a good representation is a crucial challenge for Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. Recent work has developed theoretical insights into these algorithms. We take a step towards bridging the gap between theory and practice by analyzing an action-conditional self-predictive objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T07:22:12Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• Interactive Autonomous Navigation with Internal State Inference and Interactivity Estimation [58.21683603243387]
  We propose three auxiliary tasks with relational-temporal reasoning and integrate them into the standard Deep Learning framework. These auxiliary tasks provide additional supervision signals to infer the behavior patterns other interactive agents. Our approach achieves robust and state-of-the-art performance in terms of standard evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T18:57:42Z)
• Interpretable Imitation Learning with Dynamic Causal Relations [65.18456572421702]
  We propose to expose captured knowledge in the form of a directed acyclic causal graph. We also design this causal discovery process to be state-dependent, enabling it to model the dynamics in latent causal graphs. The proposed framework is composed of three parts: a dynamic causal discovery module, a causality encoding module, and a prediction module, and is trained in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T20:59:42Z)
• Dual policy as self-model for planning [71.73710074424511]
  We refer to the model used to simulate one's decisions as the agent's self-model. Inspired by current reinforcement learning approaches and neuroscience, we explore the benefits and limitations of using a distilled policy network as the self-model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T13:58:45Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Feature-Based Interpretable Reinforcement Learning based on State-Transition Models [3.883460584034766]
  Growing concerns regarding the operational usage of AI models in the real-world has caused a surge of interest in explaining AI models' decisions to humans. We propose a method for offering local explanations on risk in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-14T23:43:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.