Multi-objective optimisation via the R2 utilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11774v3
• Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 15:48:52 GMT
• Title: Multi-objective optimisation via the R2 utilities
• Authors: Ben Tu, Nikolas Kantas, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei,
• Abstract summary: We show how to recast the multi-objective optimisation problem into a single-objective optimisation problem defined over sets. An appropriate class of objective functions for this new problem are the R2 utilities, which are utility functions that are defined as a weighted integral over the scalarised optimisation problems. We then analyse the performance of these greedy algorithms both theoretically and empirically.
• Score: 4.12484724941528
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The goal of multi-objective optimisation is to identify a collection of points which describe the best possible trade-offs between the multiple objectives. In order to solve this vector-valued optimisation problem, practitioners often appeal to the use of scalarisation functions in order to transform the multi-objective problem into a collection of single-objective problems. This set of scalarised problems can then be solved using traditional single-objective optimisation techniques. In this work, we formalise this convention into a general mathematical framework. We show how this strategy effectively recasts the original multi-objective optimisation problem into a single-objective optimisation problem defined over sets. An appropriate class of objective functions for this new problem are the R2 utilities, which are utility functions that are defined as a weighted integral over the scalarised optimisation problems. As part of our work, we show that these utilities are monotone and submodular set functions which can be optimised effectively using greedy optimisation algorithms. We then analyse the performance of these greedy algorithms both theoretically and empirically. Our analysis largely focusses on Bayesian optimisation, which is a popular probabilistic framework for black-box optimisation.

Related papers

• Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [56.04498536842065]
  Predict-Then-Then framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving. This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by joint predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T19:52:14Z)
• Iterative or Innovative? A Problem-Oriented Perspective for Code Optimization [81.88668100203913]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in solving a wide range of programming tasks. In this paper, we explore code optimization with a focus on performance enhancement, specifically aiming to optimize code for minimal execution time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:10:10Z)
• Few for Many: Tchebycheff Set Scalarization for Many-Objective Optimization [14.355588194787073]
  Multi-objective optimization can be found in many real-world applications where some conflicting objectives can not be optimized by a single solution. We propose a novel Tchebycheff set scalarization method to find a few representative solutions to cover a large number of objectives. In this way, each objective can be well addressed by at least one solution in the small solution set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T03:04:57Z)
• Analyzing and Enhancing the Backward-Pass Convergence of Unrolled Optimization [50.38518771642365]
  The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks. A central challenge in this setting is backpropagation through the solution of an optimization problem, which often lacks a closed form. This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, showing that it is equivalent to the solution of a linear system by a particular iterative method. A system called Folded Optimization is proposed to construct more efficient backpropagation rules from unrolled solver implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T23:15:18Z)
• Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
  The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks. One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver. This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z)
• A Study of Scalarisation Techniques for Multi-Objective QUBO Solving [0.0]
  Quantum and quantum-inspired optimisation algorithms have shown promising performance when applied to academic benchmarks as well as real-world problems. However, QUBO solvers are single objective solvers. To make them more efficient at solving problems with multiple objectives, a decision on how to convert such multi-objective problems to single-objective problems need to be made.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T14:54:37Z)
• Joint Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization [0.0]
  We propose a novel information-theoretic acquisition function for BO called Joint Entropy Search. We showcase the effectiveness of this new approach on a range of synthetic and real-world problems in terms of the hypervolume and its weighted variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T13:19:08Z)
• R-MBO: A Multi-surrogate Approach for Preference Incorporation in Multi-objective Bayesian Optimisation [0.0]
  We present an a-priori multi-surrogate approach to incorporate the desirable objective function values as the preferences of a decision-maker in multi-objective BO. The results and comparison with the existing mono-surrogate approach on benchmark and real-world optimisation problems show the potential of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T19:58:26Z)
• Optimizer Amalgamation [124.33523126363728]
  We are motivated to study a new problem named Amalgamation: how can we best combine a pool of "teacher" amalgamations into a single "student" that can have stronger problem-specific performance? First, we define three differentiable mechanisms to amalgamate a pool of analyticals by gradient descent. In order to reduce variance of the process, we also explore methods to stabilize the process by perturbing the target.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-12T16:07:57Z)
• Are we Forgetting about Compositional Optimisers in Bayesian Optimisation? [66.39551991177542]
  This paper presents a sample methodology for global optimisation. Within this, a crucial performance-determiningtrivial is maximising the acquisition function. We highlight the empirical advantages of the approach to optimise functionation across 3958 individual experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T12:18:38Z)
• A Framework to Handle Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization in Decomposition-based Evolutionary Algorithms [7.81768535871051]
  decomposition-based evolutionary algorithms have good performance for multi-objective optimization. They are likely to perform poorly for multi-modal multi-objective optimization due to the lack of mechanisms to maintain the solution space diversity. This paper proposes a framework to improve the performance of decomposition-based evolutionary algorithms for multi-modal multi-objective optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T14:32:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.