GPTAraEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Arabic NLP
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14976v2
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:16:24 GMT
- Title: GPTAraEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Arabic NLP
- Authors: Md Tawkat Islam Khondaker, Abdul Waheed, El Moatez Billah Nagoudi,
Muhammad Abdul-Mageed
- Abstract summary: This study conducts a large-scale automated and human evaluation of ChatGPT, encompassing 44 distinct language understanding and generation tasks.
Our findings indicate that, despite its remarkable performance in English, ChatGPT is consistently surpassed by smaller models that have undergone finetuning on Arabic.
- Score: 21.6253870440136
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: ChatGPT's emergence heralds a transformative phase in NLP, particularly
demonstrated through its excellent performance on many English benchmarks.
However, the model's efficacy across diverse linguistic contexts remains
largely uncharted territory. This work aims to bridge this knowledge gap, with
a primary focus on assessing ChatGPT's capabilities on Arabic languages and
dialectal varieties. Our comprehensive study conducts a large-scale automated
and human evaluation of ChatGPT, encompassing 44 distinct language
understanding and generation tasks on over 60 different datasets. To our
knowledge, this marks the first extensive performance analysis of ChatGPT's
deployment in Arabic NLP. Our findings indicate that, despite its remarkable
performance in English, ChatGPT is consistently surpassed by smaller models
that have undergone finetuning on Arabic. We further undertake a meticulous
comparison of ChatGPT and GPT-4's Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Dialectal
Arabic (DA), unveiling the relative shortcomings of both models in handling
Arabic dialects compared to MSA. Although we further explore and confirm the
utility of employing GPT-4 as a potential alternative for human evaluation, our
work adds to a growing body of research underscoring the limitations of
ChatGPT.
Related papers
- The Qiyas Benchmark: Measuring ChatGPT Mathematical and Language Understanding in Arabic [0.0]
We introduce two novel benchmarks designed to evaluate models' mathematical reasoning and language understanding abilities in Arabic.
These benchmarks are derived from a General Aptitude Test (GAT) called Qiyas exam, a standardized test widely used for university admissions in Saudi Arabia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T16:34:31Z) - Taqyim: Evaluating Arabic NLP Tasks Using ChatGPT Models [6.145834902689888]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on various downstream tasks without requiring fine-tuning.
Despite having a lower training proportion compared to English, these models also exhibit remarkable capabilities in other languages.
In this study, we assess the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models on seven distinct Arabic NLP tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T15:54:29Z) - ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Time [54.18651663847874]
ChatGPT has achieved great success and can be considered to have acquired an infrastructural status.
Existing benchmarks encounter two challenges: (1) Disregard for periodical evaluation and (2) Lack of fine-grained features.
We construct ChatLog, an ever-updating dataset with large-scale records of diverse long-form ChatGPT responses for 21 NLP benchmarks from March, 2023 to now.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-27T11:33:48Z) - ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large
Language Models in Multilingual Learning [70.57126720079971]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as the most important breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP)
This paper evaluates ChatGPT on 7 different tasks, covering 37 diverse languages with high, medium, low, and extremely low resources.
Compared to the performance of previous models, our extensive experimental results demonstrate a worse performance of ChatGPT for different NLP tasks and languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-12T05:08:52Z) - ChatGPT-Crawler: Find out if ChatGPT really knows what it's talking
about [15.19126287569545]
This research examines the responses generated by ChatGPT from different Conversational QA corpora.
The study employed BERT similarity scores to compare these responses with correct answers and obtain Natural Language Inference(NLI) labels.
The study identified instances where ChatGPT provided incorrect answers to questions, providing insights into areas where the model may be prone to error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T18:42:47Z) - Comparative Analysis of CHATGPT and the evolution of language models [0.0]
This paper highlights the prevailing ideas in NLP, including machine translation, machine summarization, question-answering, and language generation.
A strategy for validating the arguments and results of ChatGPT is presented summarily as an example of safe, large-scale adoption of Large Language Models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:11:28Z) - Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study [121.77986688862302]
We provide a preliminary meta-evaluation on ChatGPT to show its reliability as an NLG metric.
Experimental results show that compared with previous automatic metrics, ChatGPT achieves state-of-the-art or competitive correlation with human judgments.
We hope our preliminary study could prompt the emergence of a general-purposed reliable NLG metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T16:57:20Z) - Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and
Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries.
We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models.
We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z) - Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot.
Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community.
It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z) - Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine [97.8609714773255]
We evaluate ChatGPT for machine translation, including translation prompt, multilingual translation, and translation robustness.
ChatGPT performs competitively with commercial translation products but lags behind significantly on low-resource or distant languages.
With the launch of the GPT-4 engine, the translation performance of ChatGPT is significantly boosted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-20T08:51:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.