What and How does In-Context Learning Learn? Bayesian Model Averaging,
Parameterization, and Generalization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19420v2
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 04:47:47 GMT
- Title: What and How does In-Context Learning Learn? Bayesian Model Averaging,
Parameterization, and Generalization
- Authors: Yufeng Zhang, Fengzhuo Zhang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang
- Abstract summary: We study In-Context Learning (ICL) by addressing several open questions.
We show that, without updating the neural network parameters, ICL implicitly implements the Bayesian model averaging algorithm.
We prove that the error of pretrained model is bounded by a sum of an approximation error and a generalization error.
- Score: 111.55277952086155
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study of In-Context Learning (ICL)
by addressing several open questions: (a) What type of ICL estimator is learned
by large language models? (b) What is a proper performance metric for ICL and
what is the error rate? (c) How does the transformer architecture enable ICL?
To answer these questions, we adopt a Bayesian view and formulate ICL as a
problem of predicting the response corresponding to the current covariate,
given a number of examples drawn from a latent variable model. To answer (a),
we show that, without updating the neural network parameters, ICL implicitly
implements the Bayesian model averaging algorithm, which is proven to be
approximately parameterized by the attention mechanism. For (b), we analyze the
ICL performance from an online learning perspective and establish a
$\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ regret bound for perfectly pretrained ICL, where $T$ is the
number of examples in the prompt. To answer (c), we show that, in addition to
encoding Bayesian model averaging via attention, the transformer architecture
also enables a fine-grained statistical analysis of pretraining under realistic
assumptions. In particular, we prove that the error of pretrained model is
bounded by a sum of an approximation error and a generalization error, where
the former decays to zero exponentially as the depth grows, and the latter
decays to zero sublinearly with the number of tokens in the pretraining
dataset. Our results provide a unified understanding of the transformer and its
ICL ability with bounds on ICL regret, approximation, and generalization, which
deepens our knowledge of these essential aspects of modern language models.
Related papers
- Characterizing out-of-distribution generalization of neural networks: application to the disordered Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model [38.79241114146971]
We show how interpretability methods can increase trust in predictions of a neural network trained to classify quantum phases.
In particular, we show that we can ensure better out-of-distribution generalization in the complex classification problem.
This work is an example of how the systematic use of interpretability methods can improve the performance of NNs in scientific problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-14T13:24:32Z) - Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI [44.854771627716225]
A conditional generative model (CGM) is prompted with a dataset and asked to make a prediction based on that dataset.
We develop a new method that takes an ICL problem -- that is, a CGM, a dataset, and a prediction question -- and estimates the probability that a CGM will generate a hallucination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T17:01:52Z) - Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression [72.59731158970894]
This paper presents a succinct derivation of the training and generalization performance of a variety of high-dimensional ridge regression models.
We provide an introduction and review of recent results on these topics, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T15:59:00Z) - In-Context Language Learning: Architectures and Algorithms [73.93205821154605]
We study ICL through the lens of a new family of model problems we term in context language learning (ICLL)
We evaluate a diverse set of neural sequence models on regular ICLL tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T18:59:21Z) - How Do Transformers Learn In-Context Beyond Simple Functions? A Case
Study on Learning with Representations [98.7450564309923]
This paper takes initial steps on understanding in-context learning (ICL) in more complex scenarios, by studying learning with representations.
We construct synthetic in-context learning problems with a compositional structure, where the label depends on the input through a possibly complex but fixed representation function.
We show theoretically the existence of transformers that approximately implement such algorithms with mild depth and size.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T17:40:49Z) - Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with
In-Context Algorithm Selection [88.23337313766353]
This work first provides a comprehensive statistical theory for transformers to perform ICL.
We show that transformers can implement a broad class of standard machine learning algorithms in context.
A emphsingle transformer can adaptively select different base ICL algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T17:59:31Z) - A Mechanism for Sample-Efficient In-Context Learning for Sparse
Retrieval Tasks [29.764014766305174]
We show how a transformer model is able to perform ICL under reasonable assumptions on the pre-training process and the downstream tasks.
We establish that this entire procedure is implementable using the transformer mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T15:49:43Z) - Explaining Emergent In-Context Learning as Kernel Regression [61.57151500616111]
Large language models (LLMs) have initiated a paradigm shift in transfer learning.
In this paper, we investigate the reason why a transformer-based language model can accomplish in-context learning after pre-training.
We find that during ICL, the attention and hidden features in LLMs match the behaviors of a kernel regression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T06:45:02Z) - Learning Invariant Representations using Inverse Contrastive Loss [34.93395633215398]
We introduce a class of losses for learning representations that are invariant to some extraneous variable of interest.
We show that if the extraneous variable is binary, then optimizing ICL is equivalent to optimizing a regularized MMD divergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-16T18:29:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.