ROSARL: Reward-Only Safe Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00035v1
• Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 08:33:23 GMT
• Title: ROSARL: Reward-Only Safe Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Geraud Nangue Tasse, Tamlin Love, Mark Nemecek, Steven James, Benjamin Rosman
• Abstract summary: An important problem in reinforcement learning is designing agents that learn to solve tasks safely in an environment. A common solution is for a human expert to define either a penalty in the reward function or a cost to be minimised when reaching unsafe states. This is non-trivial, since too small a penalty may lead to agents that reach unsafe states, while too large a penalty increases the time to convergence.
• Score: 11.998722332188
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: An important problem in reinforcement learning is designing agents that learn to solve tasks safely in an environment. A common solution is for a human expert to define either a penalty in the reward function or a cost to be minimised when reaching unsafe states. However, this is non-trivial, since too small a penalty may lead to agents that reach unsafe states, while too large a penalty increases the time to convergence. Additionally, the difficulty in designing reward or cost functions can increase with the complexity of the problem. Hence, for a given environment with a given set of unsafe states, we are interested in finding the upper bound of rewards at unsafe states whose optimal policies minimise the probability of reaching those unsafe states, irrespective of task rewards. We refer to this exact upper bound as the "Minmax penalty", and show that it can be obtained by taking into account both the controllability and diameter of an environment. We provide a simple practical model-free algorithm for an agent to learn this Minmax penalty while learning the task policy, and demonstrate that using it leads to agents that learn safe policies in high-dimensional continuous control environments.

Related papers

• Uniformly Safe RL with Objective Suppression for Multi-Constraint Safety-Critical Applications [73.58451824894568]
  The widely adopted CMDP model constrains the risks in expectation, which makes room for dangerous behaviors in long-tail states. In safety-critical domains, such behaviors could lead to disastrous outcomes. We propose Objective Suppression, a novel method that adaptively suppresses the task reward maximizing objectives according to a safety critic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T23:22:06Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• A Multiplicative Value Function for Safe and Efficient Reinforcement Learning [131.96501469927733]
  We propose a safe model-free RL algorithm with a novel multiplicative value function consisting of a safety critic and a reward critic. The safety critic predicts the probability of constraint violation and discounts the reward critic that only estimates constraint-free returns. We evaluate our method in four safety-focused environments, including classical RL benchmarks augmented with safety constraints and robot navigation tasks with images and raw Lidar scans as observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:29:15Z)
• Handling Long and Richly Constrained Tasks through Constrained Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [20.280636126917614]
  Safety in goal directed Reinforcement Learning (RL) settings has typically been handled through constraints over trajectories. We propose a (safety) Constrained Search with Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (CoSHRL) mechanism that combines an upper level constrained search agent with a low-level goal conditioned RL agent. A major advantage of CoSHRL is that it can handle constraints on the cost value distribution and can adjust to flexible constraint thresholds without retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T12:57:12Z)
• Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning by Verifying Task-Level Properties [84.64203221849648]
  Cost functions are commonly employed in Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) The cost is typically encoded as an indicator function due to the difficulty of quantifying the risk of policy decisions in the state space. In this paper, we investigate an alternative approach that uses domain knowledge to quantify the risk in the proximity of such states by defining a violation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T15:24:06Z)
• Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environments [84.3830478851369]
  We propose a safe reinforcement learning approach that can jointly learn the environment and optimize the control policy. Our approach can effectively enforce hard safety constraints and significantly outperform CMDP-based baseline methods in system safe rate measured via simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T20:49:25Z)
• Enhancing Safe Exploration Using Safety State Augmentation [71.00929878212382]
  We tackle the problem of safe exploration in model-free reinforcement learning. We derive policies for scheduling the safety budget during training. We show that Simmer can stabilize training and improve the performance of safe RL with average constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T15:23:07Z)
• Safe Exploration for Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Provable Guarantees [2.379828460137829]
  We propose a model-based safe RL algorithm that we call the Optimistic-Pessimistic Safe Reinforcement Learning (OPSRL) algorithm. We show that it achieves an $tildemathcalO(S2sqrtA H7K/ (barC - barC_b)$ cumulative regret without violating the safety constraints during learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T23:21:48Z)
• Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value Functions [43.649330976089004]
  We model the problem of learning with constraints as a Constrained Markov Decision Process. A key contribution of our approach is to translate cumulative cost constraints into state-based constraints. We provide theoretical guarantees under which the agent converges while ensuring safety over the course of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T20:56:16Z)
• Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning [34.40385583372232]
  Inverse reinforcement learning can enable generalization to new states by learning a parameterized reward function. Existing safe imitation learning approaches based on IRL deal with this uncertainty using a maxmin framework. BROIL provides a natural way to interpolate between return-maximizing and risk-minimizing behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T01:52:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.